Greater Greater Washington

Education


DC may tighten school graduation requirements

The DC State Board of Education this summer released a proposal to update graduation requirements for DC public school students. Many of the proposed changes have merit. Others seem overly prescriptive and raise some questions which the board does not explain in its report.


Photo by Sarah Ross photography on Flickr.

The proposal is the culmination of a year of intense behind-the-scenes work and public meetings by the Board and staff at the Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE). Students will have to take some advanced mathematics, more visual or performing arts, and physical education.

Students will also need to take some college preparatory courses and complete a thesis or culminating project. These proposals have merit, though there are ways they can serve students' future even better, and they raise some questions about how DC schools will staff programs and prepare students for the requirements at many middle schools.

2 units of required world languages stays the same under the proposal, and the number of required english, math, and science units holds steady at 4 units each. A half unit is a semester, so 4 units is 4 full years of each subject. 4 years of each, according to the Board's discussion document, is a national best practice and a requirement for most colleges.

Other requirements decline, including social studies and opportunities for electives, which pose some cause for worry that I will discuss in part 2.

Include financial literacy in mathematics

Students can receive credit for advanced mathematics courses they previously took in middle school. The high school math requirements will include one unit "above Algebra II or its equivalent," basically a calculus, trigonometry, or other challenging mathematics course.

While this higher math requirement will promote critical thinking and analysis for students, it could be more useful to offer many students a personal financial literacy course that can count as a mathematics unit.

Students leaving high school without a "real world" math class to ensure financial literacy does a disservice to all students, whether they go on to college or not. Most students entering college leave high school with little understanding of how student loans work, how expensive college and living expenses are, and how easy it is to get mired in an endless cycle of credit card debt.

Students directly entering the workforce following high school need to know how to put a household budget together, how to save for major purchases, and, again, how easy it is to obtain credit and how difficult high-interest credit is to pay off. For many DCPS students, high school is the last opportunity they have to learn personal finance best practices.

Arts gets a boost, but depends on more teachers and programs at more schools

The board has proposed increasing requirements in several areas, including combining art and music into a single category and increasing requirements from a half unit of eachfor a one unit totalto a combined 2 units of "Visual/Performing Arts."

The only rationale the report gives for this increase is that it "promotes well-rounded students." There is no analysis about whether DCPS will be able to hire enough qualified high school music and art teachers by next year to augment the roughly 100 art and 100 music teachers currently teaching at DCPS high schools.

As a student of music and arts myself, I agree that increasing music and arts knowledge and appreciation makes for a more well-rounded graduate. However, some DCPS middle schools do not offer their students music courses, such as the 110 students at Shaw Middle School at Garnet Patterson, or the 50 or so middle school students at CHOICE Academy.

DCPS needs to establish effective, permanent art and music programs at all DC middle schools before mandating 2 full units of art and music courses for high school graduation. Recent DC Council legislation introduced by Councilmember Jack Evans is a good start to correcting this problem.

It might also be more effective and demonstrate to students the interplay between divergent subject areas if some course offerings fulfilled multiple graduation requirement units. There is a direct link between music and mathematics, for instance. A robust music theory course, heavy on mathematics, could conceivably fulfill both music and math requirements, assisting the student in understanding the importance of each aspect of the course to the other subject area.

By tying more subjects to each other through "joint" or "dual" courses and demonstrating to students the importance of their interplay and interdependence, DCPS will produce better students that more fully comprehend the real world interaction of divergent subjects and issues.

More physical education promotes health

The board has also proposed increasing "Physical and Health Education" requirements from 1.5 units to 2 units, to support the Healthy Schools Act and promote physical health. Of the 2 units proposed, a half unit would need to be in health education, and the other 1.5 units would be in physical education, which can include PE classes, team sport participation, or Junior ROTC. Students must also engage in 50 hours of physical activity annually to graduate.

Obesity and preventable diseases continue to plague Washingtonians. Our children have the highest obesity rate in the country at 23%, and a 2010 study found 14,465 DC residents infected with HIV, a full 2.7% of our population and among the highest of any US city. With these stats, it's difficult to dispute this proposed increase.

Students will take college preparatory courses and complete a major project

The proposal will require each student earn at least 2 of the 24 required units through courses that appear on the approved DCPS 'College Level or Career Prep' list. The board hopes this will promote college and career readiness.

For the first time, DCPS students will receive credit for courses taken at regional colleges and universities, a vital step to fully preparing students for college. Guilford County, NC, has produced a successful model for early/middle college preparation that has paid dividends in increasing graduation rates and student achievement.

Allowing our students to earn credit for college courses taken in high school provides students better preparation for college, offers them more elective courses, and continues to challenge those exceptional students who are ready earlier than their peers to participate in a college/university experience.

The same justificationcollege and career readinessunderlies a new recommendation that students complete a "Thesis/Culminating Project" in the junior or senior year. This would compel students to think critically, broadly, and intensely on a major project. It also provides students an opportunity to experience first-hand what is required in terms of comprehensive research, analysis, and writing in today's global workforce.

It's not clear if DC schools will prepare all students during their freshman and sophomore years to complete a research- and writing-intense thesis project their junior or senior year. If the courses offered to freshmen and sophomores do not offer enough direction, instruction, and preparation, a student may not be able to complete the culminating project. It's also still unclear as to what would qualify as a culminating project and how they would be graded.

That's not all that's still unclear from the report. In part 2, I'll discuss some of the changes which cause concern, and the problems with the information the board has provided parents and the public.

Jack Jacobson is an Advisory Neighborhood Commissioner and community activist in Dupont Circle and a candidate for the Ward 2 seat on the DC State Board of Education this November. He chaired the 17th Street Moratorium Committee in 2009 and serves as Secretary of the Urban Neighborhood Alliance

Comments

Add a comment »

So the only improvement in STEM is a bit of financial math? Wow.

by Jasper on Oct 3, 2012 10:31 am • linkreport

@Jasper

Actually, that's the suggestion given here, not the new policy.

And why shouldn't we have financial math? One of the big problems with our education system currently is that everything is focused on college prep, which not everyone needs. We need to stratify more and teach kids who aren't going to and don't need to go to college real-world skills that can be applied in daily life.

Also, those clamoring for more STEM education need to take a hard look at how those fields are taught in college and figure out how to make them more accessible to more people. Plenty of people who are really good at math take a pass on those majors in college because they leave little room for taking classes outside your major.

by MLD on Oct 3, 2012 11:01 am • linkreport

@ MLD:And why shouldn't we have financial math?

Didn't say we shouldn't. Finance is a good subject to teach.

Also, those clamoring for more STEM education need to take a hard look at how those fields are taught in college and figure out how to make them more accessible to more people. Plenty of people who are really good at math take a pass on those majors in college because they leave little room for taking classes outside your major.

The only way I can read "more accessible" here is as "costing less time". Euhm, sorry. Hard stuff takes time to learn. It is true that STEM classes are more demanding than other classes. I find it odd though that many people want the STEM classes to be less demanding in stead of the other classes to be more demanding. Demand some value for your education money!

Furthermore, there is a considerable effort to make things better in college. The field of Physics Education Research is booming, and Chemistry Education is catching up quickly. The results are slowly trickling to the classroom, with or without NSF funding.

However, teaching methods for all subjects need to be improved, not just in STEM.

None of that however, helps America stay STEM savy. America is loosing its natural advantage in STEM to the rest of the world. For decades, America has relied on immigrant students to do its STEM research. However, more and more of those students are now returning to or staying home, because they have opportunities there as well.

China is building new universities in all Chinese cities with more than a million people. That means that they're building 100 brand-spanking new universities. Those universities need to be staffed and attract students. Do you think that in a decade or so, Chinese students will still be clamoring to get educated in the US and make up roughly a quarter of all STEM students? Of course not. They will have opportunities back home. Indian students see more opportunities at home as well. The King of Saudi-Arabia founded KAUST, which he gave an endowment the size of Harvard's and the assignment to get the world's brightest scientists. You think that's not going to have an influence on the arrival of good Middle-Eastern students in the US? Even the EU is rapidly improving the research institutions in former East-Block countries.

Google, Intel, YouTube, Yahoo and eBay were all (co-)founded by people who immigrated into the US as kids because the situation at home was pretty bad. In all those places opportunities are improving.

http://coe.berkeley.edu/news-center/publications/engineering-news/archive/engineering-news-vol-78-no-8F/immigrants-a-201cdriving-force201d-in-u-s-companies.html

It is already the case, and Washingtonians should know that, that the US government is having a hard time attracting enough talent to run its own research programs. Just check the list with positions at APL, NIST and NRL. Plenty of open positions there. And they stay open because they can not find (enough) qualified Americans. Or they resort to tricks to bypass the rules and get aliens anyway.

[sorry, that went slightly off-topic. It is important to point out that America needs to work very hard at STEM-savy people.]

by Jasper on Oct 3, 2012 11:51 am • linkreport

> 2 [years] of required world languages

But what the children need is thoughtful, in-depth training with firearms. Settling their disagreements by force wouldn't pose such peril to the public if they had the skill to take accurate aim.

by Turnip on Oct 3, 2012 8:14 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or

Support Us