Government
Nadler transit amendment passes on voice vote
The House just approved Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY)'s amendment to add $3 billion in transit capital funding to the stimulus. They approved it on a voice vote instead of a roll call.
According to Nadler's floor speech, 1.5 billion will go to the transit capital formula program, which goes to all states, and 1.5 billion to the new starts program. The AFL-CIO and environmental organizations will "score" this amendment, he said, meaning they'll factor members' votes on this issue into their scorecard ratings for each Representative. Since it was a voice vote, though, we don't know who opposed the amendment, making that impossible.
John Mica (R-FL), ranking member of the Tranportation Committee and the House's leading pro-transit Republican, called this "an amendment we have to support." The Appropriations committee, he said, "took one of the most important parts out: that's the rail and transit." Transit infrastructure creates jobs, he said. "Support the Nadler amendment!"
Transportation Chairman James Oberstar (D-MN) added, "we heard very clearly from the major transit agencies in this country. They have options for buses. They have options for railcars that could be exercised within days." Manufacturers can ramp up production and create jobs all across the nation.
Rep. David Dreier Jerry Lewis (R-CA), the ranking Republican on the Appropriations Committee, "reluctantly" opposed since the amendment didn't cut spending somewhere else. Rep. David Obey (D-WI), the Appropriations Chair, gave the shortest speech: "I urge support to the amendment."
Oregon's Peter DeFazio: "Americans are loving their transit systems to death. There's $160 billion of deferred maintenance on these systems... there are 10,000 options for new buses, buses made in America. They can't be executed because our transit systems don't have the money." Rep. Gene Green (D-TX), mentioned light rail in Houston. "This bill must be a jobs bill. The [Chicago Transit Authority] head ... said she could spend $500 million tomorrow" putting people to work, added Dan Lipinski of Illinois. "Nothing will create more jobs than funding transportation infrastructure," said Staten Island's new Congressman, Democrat Michael McMahon.
Keith Ellison of Minnesota talked about the record transit ridership last year. Dan Maffei (D-NY) relayed recent news that the transit system of his hometown of Syracuse is facing deep cuts.
Nobody other than Dreier Lewis spoke against the amendment.
Update: The House also rejected an amendment by Rep. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) to remove all funding for Amtrak. "In 40 years, Amtrak has not turned a profit, and the federal government has continued to subsidize it." Flake, of course, didn't talk about all the federal subsidy to roads and airports, which he isn't trying to eliminate. Corinne Brown (D-FL), however, made that very point. "There is no form of transportation that pays for itself. None whatsoever. Whether we're talking about rail, airlines, cars, none of that. We subsidize all of that."
Comments
- Community stories show the shift to a walkable lifestyle
- Young kids try to assault me while biking
- Focus transportation on downtown or neighborhoods?
- Some are pushing to limit sidewalk cycling
- Metro bag searches aren't always optional
- Where is downtown Prince George's County?
- Endless zoning update delay hurts homeowners






by PJ on Jan 28, 2009 2:50 pm • link • report
by Michael on Jan 28, 2009 2:57 pm • link • report
by Donald Kosin on Jan 28, 2009 3:23 pm • link • report
by Cavan on Jan 28, 2009 3:24 pm • link • report
by Thayer-D on Jan 28, 2009 3:32 pm • link • report
by Douglas Willinger on Jan 28, 2009 3:54 pm • link • report
by jedediah Redman on Jan 28, 2009 4:51 pm • link • report
by Dave Reid on Jan 28, 2009 4:55 pm • link • report
by Douglas Willinger on Jan 28, 2009 4:59 pm • link • report
by Crank on Jan 28, 2009 5:04 pm • link • report
by Robert Paehlke on Jan 28, 2009 5:11 pm • link • report
The whole transit OR highways dogma serves as a useful distraction from the reality that we spend way too much upon wars.
by Douglas Willinger on Jan 28, 2009 5:15 pm • link • report
by Robert Bennett on Jan 28, 2009 6:31 pm • link • report
by Beth! on Jan 28, 2009 7:12 pm • link • report
I was happy to turn on C-SPAN to watch this. :)
Both Mica and Corrine Brown have been my Rep. -- nice to see them doing something good.
by Gavin Baker on Jan 28, 2009 7:30 pm • link • report
by Beth! on Jan 28, 2009 8:01 pm • link • report
====
This is great news.. Maybe all the emails and phone calls actually worked.
by Dave Reid on Jan 28, 2009 4:55 pm
It would be interesting to find out what did it. Where the push and pressure came from. TPM says there were zero GOP votes. Yikes.
by Jazzy on Jan 28, 2009 8:21 pm • link • report
by Ryan on Jan 28, 2009 8:36 pm • link • report
by Douglas Willinger on Jan 28, 2009 8:38 pm • link • report
by Steve on Jan 29, 2009 12:00 am • link • report
Lots of other countries who understand terror on a far more intimate level than the United States - Israel, Britain, the Philippines - didn't stop investing in their rail networks. In fact, they expanded them - with a minimum of the kind of security theater we've been inured to experience, I might add.
Furthermore, it's a bit galling listening to someone from Phoenix lecture Washingtonians (or New Yorkers, for that matter) about terrorism, security, and transportation needs.
by Daniel M. Laenker on Jan 29, 2009 2:05 am • link • report
Absolutely.
I mistyped when I left out the comma after the word "why".
by Douglas Willinger on Jan 29, 2009 2:43 am • link • report
by NikolasM on Jan 29, 2009 10:49 am • link • report
by CP on Jan 29, 2009 1:13 pm • link • report
by R Mott, SF on Jan 29, 2009 7:40 pm • link • report
Add a Comment