Greater Greater Washington

Development


As new homes shrink, buyers seek community instead

While the real estate bust wracked much of the nation in recent years, the DC area escaped largely unscathed. However, one thing has changed: buyers want smaller homes, and builders are listening.

Stormy Skies Over Maple Lawn
New homes at Maple Lawn today.

Down Midtown Road
New homes at Maple Lawn in 2006.

The homes in each photo were built at Maple Lawn, a New Urbanist planned community north of Burtonsville in Howard County, by local builder Miller & Smith. The bottom photo is of the Foxhall model, which they sold between 2005 and 2007. (Miller & Smith tends to name their homes after urban neighborhoods or themes.) It measured about 3,400 square feet, not counting the basement, and it sold for upwards of $800,000.

Here's how Miller & Smith described it on their website:

The Foxhall Collection features 10' high ceilings, a gracious two-story entry foyer, formal living room and dining room with butler's pantry, spacious great room, 21st century kitchen and sunny breakfast room. Tucked away, the hobby/tech room makes an excellent study or children's homework area. Outside, enjoy your own private courtyard - perfect for entertaining! Upstairs, there is a sumptuous master suite with sitting room and luxury bath: plus 3 more bedrooms. Expansion options include finished lower level and bonus room. Over 3,400 sq ft of living space for today's active families!
The top photo is of the Fells Point and Gramercy Park models, which are for sale now. These homes have about 2,300 and 2,800 square feet, respectively, not including the basement. And they're much cheaper, each selling for less than $600,000.

From the descriptions, you can see how the interiors of each house have changed:

Fells Point: An open floorplan connects the great room and dining room to a fabulous kitchen with Infinity Island. Upstairs there's a dreamy master suite with luxury features including two walk-in closets.

Gramercy Park: A dramatic, open design with a stylish kitchen including an Infinity Island and the opportunity for a plenty of natural light. A separate dining room and study complete the main level.

Six years ago, Miller & Smith emphasized the Foxhall's two-story foyer and formal living and dining rooms, spaces that look good but are rarely used and require extra maintenance. Today, they stress the "openness" of the Fells Point and Gramercy Park.

Visiting the models of both houses last weekend, I was surprised to find almost no walls on the ground floor. The Gramercy Park has a formal dining room but no living room, while the Fells Point has neither. The master bathroom, which architectural critic Witold Rybczynski once called "America's latest status symbol," is reduced to a sink, toilet and shower.

These houses are 1/3 smaller and 1/4 cheaper than what was built before, but the hardwood floors and granite countertops are still there. Buyers can save money and reduce their energy use, but without sacrificing comfort or luxury.

Gramercy Park + Fells Point Models
The Gramercy Park (left) and Fells Point (right) models are 1/3 smaller than homes built in 2006.

However, smaller homes aren't just a Maple Lawn or even a DC-area phenomenon. New homes are shrinking across the country.

Part of the trend may be coming from younger buyers, who just don't want or care about all that extra space. Nancy, the sales agent I met at the model house, pointed out that her visitors include a lot of older couples seeking to downsize from a larger home, but the ones who actually buy are young families. The current buzz is about young singles wanting in-town apartments, but when they outgrow the studio, the interest in smaller homes may persist.

That said, buyers are willing to give up space within their home for amenities outside of it. A study from real estate consultants RCLCO found that buyers will sacrifice a larger house to have a shorter commute. Maple Lawn puts residents within close reach of schools, shops and even jobs. You don't need a movie theatre in your house when there's stuff to do outside. And when your house faces a common green, you can make do with a smaller yard, which in turn makes the house more affordable.

Outdoor Room, Rhapsody In Blue
Backyard of a similar Miller & Smith house in Clarksburg.

Maple Lawn's not perfect. These are still large houses; my parents live in an 1,800-square-foot house that comfortably fits a family of 4. The neighborhood's layout isn't totally ideal for walking, and it displaced working farmland in an area with no transit where residents will have to drive to leave the community. And it's 3 miles from an existing town where 70% of the stores are empty.

However, it shows that buyers will sacrifice space to live in even a semi-walkable neighborhood with amenities close at hand. That's a good sign for places that are already walkable or are trying to become so.

A planner and architect by training, Dan Reed is interested in suburban retrofits. Dan works for the Friends of White Flint, writes his own blog, Just Up the Pike, and serves as the Land Use Chair for the Action Committee for Transit. Dan lives in Silver Spring. 

Comments

Add a comment »

I'm considering selling my small (~1,000 sqft) colonial brick home in Hyattsville and moving to one of the townhomes in Maple Lawn. While the transit accessibility of West Hyattsville is much greater than ML, the sense of community up there seems to be more tight knit. Of course, as soon as I sell this home, I'm sure developers will finally make a move on West Hyattsville Metro and I'll miss out on the uptick in pricing...

by SM on Oct 10, 2012 10:47 am • linkreport

It's funny how things come around. People used to live in their living room and dine in their dining room. With McMansionization, these rooms where relegated to the "public" realm while the family lived in the family room and ate in their breakfast alcove. Now it seems they've finally gotten rid of these superfluous rooms. I will say that those two houses in the photo seem like shrink wrapped larger homes. I guess people are still holding on to the placard facade of size on the exterior.

by Thayer-D on Oct 10, 2012 10:52 am • linkreport

I am tickled by the idea, however factually correct, of "smaller" houses that are 2,300-2,800 square feet, not including the basement.

by Miriam on Oct 10, 2012 10:57 am • linkreport

I'm not sure comparing one section of a planned neighborhood to another is worth the type. The appeal of Maple Lawn is living in Maple Lawn. All of the homes are relatively large whether a traditional single family home , detached "townhome," or townhome or townhome condo. Many have detached or attached garages in the rear so the home doesn't take up the same footprint of more traditional suburban layouts. The front width of the home may not look as large from the exterior as many homes in the region, but the interior is just as large if not larger. Also, open layouts don't remove rooms. They simply give the owner more flexibility and are becoming more common in all sized homes. Likewise, shouldn't a smaller home made by one builder be less than a larger home by the same builder in the same neighborhood?

by selxic on Oct 10, 2012 10:57 am • linkreport

Putting the garages in the rear or facing an alley is also an important aesthetic consideration. While a forward facing garage might be slightly easier to pull into it can also take up a lot of the facade and there are plenty of neighborhoods all over of smaller homes that are pretty much a front door and then a garage door. If it's townhomes with ground level garages that face forward its also hard to have more than 1 or 2 visitors without running out of places to be able to park on the street.

Legalize alleys.

by drumz on Oct 10, 2012 11:26 am • linkreport

@SM-If you can, I'd try and hold out for another 5-10 years. W. Hyattsville Metro is ripe for development. Obviously, if you're family is growing, you may not be able to, but if nothing has changed (job location, family size), I don't see how moving out that far is a plus. Have you looked at Mt. Rainier, or Riverdale, or University Park or Woodridge even? Seems like you could get the same sense of community you really want in the same price range w/o the burden of a terrible commute..not that I know where you work, but Maple Lawn is WAY out there and driving will be your only option.

by thump on Oct 10, 2012 12:52 pm • linkreport

Meanwhile in South Riding:
http://www.homes.com/Real_Estate/VA/City/SOUTH%20RIDING/

by Jasper on Oct 10, 2012 1:01 pm • linkreport

2,300 to 2,800 square feet is still really large. In my area, neighborhoods are from about the 1970s and I'd say most homes average 1,500-1,800 sf. Gosh, how ridiculously large have our homes gotten in this country? We're so shamefully wasteful.

by Kevin on Oct 10, 2012 2:45 pm • linkreport

@Thump - It's tough to justify staying in the area (including Mt. Rainier and University Park) when the county + city taxes are so high, compared with neighboring counties/the District. Montgomery Co has similar taxes, but the taxes on a $360k townhome in ML are comparable to a $140k SFH in Hyattsville. Sure you get more transportation choices for your taxes in H'ville, but the quality of life is on a different scale. My current job is located in Beltsville near Rt 1 (about a 15 min drive from ML, and 30 min drive from Hyattsville) so the new commute would be shorter. When you factor in HOA fees on top of county taxes, sure it's more expensive to live in ML, but there you get a walkable community, with a short drive to MARC trains (limited to weekdays), or a ~20 min drive to SS Metro.

It's a shame that with the new uptick in the economy and growing development around the DC region, we're still looking at a potential 5-10 year turnaround for West Hyattsville metro being developed. Had PG Plaza not been mishandled, I wonder if things today would be different at the Hyattsville Metro? Sorry to go off on a tangent here.

Back to the topic, the few times I've visited ML, the community has simply seemed much more tight-knit and friendly than I see in this area of PG County (not to mention less crime, traffic and better maintained everything).

by SM on Oct 10, 2012 6:30 pm • linkreport

Too bad this greenfield development wasnt built as an infill project by a transit station or as an extension of an existing town.

by ccort on Oct 11, 2012 11:01 am • linkreport

@ ccort,

That would have made too much sense. Much better to build it out in the middle of a corn field.

by mikem on Oct 11, 2012 3:04 pm • linkreport

Whenever I've watched Hoarders, I've noticed that many of the subjects are people living alone in a house that seems far bigger than what they need. I wonder if sometimes the hoarding is not just an attempt to erase all this emptiness.

by Frank IBC on Oct 11, 2012 4:03 pm • linkreport

"Too bad this greenfield development wasnt built as an infill project by a transit station or as an extension of an existing town:"

while its not exacty urban infill, ML is located almost adjacent to JHU Applied Physics Lab, and close to several existing subdivisions - suburban infill if you like.

by AWalkerInTheCity on Oct 11, 2012 4:10 pm • linkreport

@ccort, mikem, walker

Maple Lawn is built on a farm - in fact, part of it is still active until a later phase. The surrounding area west of Route 29 (and much of the area to the east) is basically rural and as far as I know will remain so for the foreseeable future.

That said, it is pretty compact and designed (to an extent) to be walkable, so maybe we could call Maple Lawn a "more benevolent form of sprawl," as Alex Marshall called Kentlands almost 20 years go.

by dan reed! on Oct 11, 2012 4:20 pm • linkreport

I disagree with this

"What the couple is doing, intentionally or not, is providing the country with a rationale for another round of suburban sprawl, only this time labeled 'New Urban' or 'neotraditional.'"

The implication is that absent DPZ the country would lack such a rationale, and have less sprawl. thats bilgewater. We have loads of sprawl that is NOT TND, and no county gov needs DPZ or CONU to justify it. Thats the same mindset that the neg commentors here have - that neourbanist stuff should only be built in cities, and somehow that will end sprawl. It won't. Theres a market for it, and it will happen -and DPZ style developments can make it genuinely better - by making it more ped oriented, and making smaller houses more desirable. And just by changing mindsets - beginner urbanism, again.

by AWalkerInTheCity on Oct 11, 2012 5:40 pm • linkreport

There are two aspects to sprawl. The location factor and the form factor. We all know what sprawl looks like and thats what DPZ and the smart code try to amend. Maple Lawn is halfway between Columbia and DC and considering plenty of people come in from Columbia to work in DC its worth considering that the cat is out of the bag on the location factor. And the form factor for this is miles ahead of what's usually expected.

by drumz on Oct 11, 2012 6:06 pm • linkreport

I honestly don't think that it makes sense to compare the foxhall in the Midtown district to the Fells point or Gramercy park in the Hillside district. If anything the Gramercy park model should be compared to the Old town model. The style and sizes are more similar. It is true though. The houses in Maple Lawn have definately changed. The havn't just changed in size but in quality as well in my opinion. Homes in the Midtown district had more attention to architectural detail. In Hillside, not only do the facades look more plain,it also seems that the use cheaper windows on the houses now and Miller and smith has stopped using moldings around the windows on the interiors. When I first visited Maple Lawn in 2006, I thought that the community was amazing. They lost me with the hillside district. I find it to be congested, confusing and poorly planned out. The worst thing I think they did was to allow Nv homes to build there. Their townhomes look terrible and don't fit in with the community. They just remind me of your typical bulky suburban townhome. There is nothing neo-traditional about them. Now they Have Nv building single family homes in Midtown West. Im hoping that they don't look as bad as their townhomes do. One thing I am looking forward to in Maple Lawn are the Michael Harris homes. Their homes look good everywhere else. Nv Homes on the other hand should have stuck to their suburban McMansions elsewhere. I cant help but wonder if they have ever considered having EYA build there. That would be a nice addition to the neighborhood in my opinion.

by D. M. on Oct 15, 2012 2:02 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or