Development
As new homes shrink, buyers seek community instead
While the real estate bust wracked much of the nation in recent years, the DC area escaped largely unscathed. However, one thing has changed: buyers want smaller homes, and builders are listening.
The homes in each photo were built at Maple Lawn, a New Urbanist planned community north of Burtonsville in Howard County, by local builder Miller & Smith. The bottom photo is of the Foxhall model, which they sold between 2005 and 2007. (Miller & Smith tends to name their homes after urban neighborhoods or themes.) It measured about 3,400 square feet, not counting the basement, and it sold for upwards of $800,000.
Here's how Miller & Smith described it on their website:
The Foxhall Collection features 10' high ceilings, a gracious two-story entry foyer, formal living room and dining room with butler's pantry, spacious great room, 21st century kitchen and sunny breakfast room. Tucked away, the hobby/tech room makes an excellent study or children's homework area. Outside, enjoy your own private courtyard - perfect for entertaining! Upstairs, there is a sumptuous master suite with sitting room and luxury bath: plus 3 more bedrooms. Expansion options include finished lower level and bonus room. Over 3,400 sq ft of living space for today's active families!The top photo is of the Fells Point and Gramercy Park models, which are for sale now. These homes have about 2,300 and 2,800 square feet, respectively, not including the basement. And they're much cheaper, each selling for less than $600,000.
From the descriptions, you can see how the interiors of each house have changed:
Fells Point: An open floorplan connects the great room and dining room to a fabulous kitchen with Infinity Island. Upstairs there's a dreamy master suite with luxury features including two walk-in closets.Six years ago, Miller & Smith emphasized the Foxhall's two-story foyer and formal living and dining rooms, spaces that look good but are rarely used and require extra maintenance. Today, they stress the "openness" of the Fells Point and Gramercy Park.Gramercy Park: A dramatic, open design with a stylish kitchen including an Infinity Island and the opportunity for a plenty of natural light. A separate dining room and study complete the main level.
Visiting the models of both houses last weekend, I was surprised to find almost no walls on the ground floor. The Gramercy Park has a formal dining room but no living room, while the Fells Point has neither. The master bathroom, which architectural critic Witold Rybczynski once called "America's latest status symbol," is reduced to a sink, toilet and shower.
These houses are 1/3 smaller and 1/4 cheaper than what was built before, but the hardwood floors and granite countertops are still there. Buyers can save money and reduce their energy use, but without sacrificing comfort or luxury.
However, smaller homes aren't just a Maple Lawn or even a DC-area phenomenon. New homes are shrinking across the country.
Part of the trend may be coming from younger buyers, who just don't want or care about all that extra space. Nancy, the sales agent I met at the model house, pointed out that her visitors include a lot of older couples seeking to downsize from a larger home, but the ones who actually buy are young families. The current buzz is about young singles wanting in-town apartments, but when they outgrow the studio, the interest in smaller homes may persist.
That said, buyers are willing to give up space within their home for amenities outside of it. A study from real estate consultants RCLCO found that buyers will sacrifice a larger house to have a shorter commute. Maple Lawn puts residents within close reach of schools, shops and even jobs. You don't need a movie theatre in your house when there's stuff to do outside. And when your house faces a common green, you can make do with a smaller yard, which in turn makes the house more affordable.
Maple Lawn's not perfect. These are still large houses; my parents live in an 1,800-square-foot house that comfortably fits a family of 4. The neighborhood's layout isn't totally ideal for walking, and it displaced working farmland in an area with no transit where residents will have to drive to leave the community. And it's 3 miles from an existing town where 70% of the stores are empty.
However, it shows that buyers will sacrifice space to live in even a semi-walkable neighborhood with amenities close at hand. That's a good sign for places that are already walkable or are trying to become so.
Comments
- Bikeshare is a gateway to private biking, not competition
- Short-term Washingtonians deserve a voice, too
- Latest Metro map drafts add Anacostia parks and other tweaks
- DC Council makes major policy changes overnight
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools
- Public land deals have both benefits and pitfalls
- Long-term closures: A solution to single-tracking?











by SM on Oct 10, 2012 10:47 am • link • report
by Thayer-D on Oct 10, 2012 10:52 am • link • report
by Miriam on Oct 10, 2012 10:57 am • link • report
by selxic on Oct 10, 2012 10:57 am • link • report
Legalize alleys.
by drumz on Oct 10, 2012 11:26 am • link • report
by thump on Oct 10, 2012 12:52 pm • link • report
http://www.homes.com/Real_Estate/VA/City/SOUTH%20RIDING/
by Jasper on Oct 10, 2012 1:01 pm • link • report
by Kevin on Oct 10, 2012 2:45 pm • link • report
It's a shame that with the new uptick in the economy and growing development around the DC region, we're still looking at a potential 5-10 year turnaround for West Hyattsville metro being developed. Had PG Plaza not been mishandled, I wonder if things today would be different at the Hyattsville Metro? Sorry to go off on a tangent here.
Back to the topic, the few times I've visited ML, the community has simply seemed much more tight-knit and friendly than I see in this area of PG County (not to mention less crime, traffic and better maintained everything).
by SM on Oct 10, 2012 6:30 pm • link • report
by ccort on Oct 11, 2012 11:01 am • link • report
That would have made too much sense. Much better to build it out in the middle of a corn field.
by mikem on Oct 11, 2012 3:04 pm • link • report
by Frank IBC on Oct 11, 2012 4:03 pm • link • report
while its not exacty urban infill, ML is located almost adjacent to JHU Applied Physics Lab, and close to several existing subdivisions - suburban infill if you like.
by AWalkerInTheCity on Oct 11, 2012 4:10 pm • link • report
Maple Lawn is built on a farm - in fact, part of it is still active until a later phase. The surrounding area west of Route 29 (and much of the area to the east) is basically rural and as far as I know will remain so for the foreseeable future.
That said, it is pretty compact and designed (to an extent) to be walkable, so maybe we could call Maple Lawn a "more benevolent form of sprawl," as Alex Marshall called Kentlands almost 20 years go.
by dan reed! on Oct 11, 2012 4:20 pm • link • report
"What the couple is doing, intentionally or not, is providing the country with a rationale for another round of suburban sprawl, only this time labeled 'New Urban' or 'neotraditional.'"
The implication is that absent DPZ the country would lack such a rationale, and have less sprawl. thats bilgewater. We have loads of sprawl that is NOT TND, and no county gov needs DPZ or CONU to justify it. Thats the same mindset that the neg commentors here have - that neourbanist stuff should only be built in cities, and somehow that will end sprawl. It won't. Theres a market for it, and it will happen -and DPZ style developments can make it genuinely better - by making it more ped oriented, and making smaller houses more desirable. And just by changing mindsets - beginner urbanism, again.
by AWalkerInTheCity on Oct 11, 2012 5:40 pm • link • report
by drumz on Oct 11, 2012 6:06 pm • link • report
by D. M. on Oct 15, 2012 2:02 pm • link • report
Add a Comment