Greater Greater Washington

Government


Hey Silicon Valley: Tech will not solve every problem

Technology is great. It has made our lives better in countless ways. It has the potential to solve a lot of problems. However, it will not cure every social ill or remedy every injustice.

That doesn't stop some folks in the Bay Area from letting their tech evangelism go just a little over the top, making it sound like they think technology will indeed solve every problem. This video advocating for a San Francisco tax law change, released today and featuring a number of well-known entrepreneurs, edges over that line:

Uptown Almanac poked fun at the video, translating its text:

0:02 - "San Francisco is dope and all..."
0:05 - "...but people get parking tickets and bikers look like assholes in my rear-view mirror."
0:10 - Disenchanted high school vice principal reveals himself: "It'd be awesome if we used technology to cure aggro cyclists. Let's give it a shot."
When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail, said some guys named Abraham, and Silicon Valley attracts hordes of people who have a lot of computer, smartphone, and social network hammers. When I go back to visit friends there, there's always a bit of culture shock hearing some people talk so effusively about how their piece of technology is going to singlehandedly solve problems of illiteracy, poverty, war or whatever.

Of course, Washington can sometimes fall into the opposite trap, thinking that government can solve every problem. Neither is true. We need innovative startups, large companies, and boring government agencies all working together. It doesn't help when government officials are totally ignorant of startups, but also a little ridiculous for startup people to ignore the value of institutions besides those with 2-100 software engineers in a suburban garage or San Francisco loft.

This particular video happens to be an ad for a ballot initiative, Proposition E, that would change the tax code in a way that would work better for startups. Uptown Almanac notes:

Now, this isn't all to say that Prop E is bad (it isn't, and it's supported by pretty much every politician, NGO, and newspaper in town), nor that free public wifi would be bad for SF (it would plug up all those cellphone dead zones, reduce utility bills for businesses and residents, provide ever-necessary connectivity to low-income students and families).

However, this ad does more than exaggerate Prop E's benefits or make small fibsit is straight up deceitful in claiming voting in favor of Prop E will do anything to improve ordinary San Franciscan's problems. Prop E won't give you wifi or fix Muni; all it will do is improve the San Francisco business tax code, largely for the benefit of tech start-ups.

Twitter co-founder Biz Stone talks in the video about how great it would be to place a real-time information screen on every bus stop. That would, indeed, be great. The obstacle to doing that is very little about tech startups and very much about the fact that someone, probably the government, has to pay to buy, install, and maintain that equipment. It would be great if San Francisco, DC, or other cities did just that, but they're not going to do it with tax policy.

(Disclosure: I worked with Biz for a little while, after Google bought his innovative startup Blogger and gradually smothered it under a mountain of amazingly scalable yet complex infrastructure and brilliant executives who all wanted to make every decision, and before he left to start some more innovative startups.)

At a recent conference, Google Ventures' Joe Kraus said, "In 5 to 10 years, your smartphone will replace your car." Smartphones can perform the function of watches, flashlights, even bubble levels, but unless they get a lot bigger and grow wheels, they won't replace the car, bus, train, or bike.

Kraus obviously knows this, and really meant, "your smartphone will be your first go-to resource for a trip instead of just hopping in your car." And it will. It'll let you plan a trip by driving, bicycling, or transit. It can let you compare the travel times, costs, and greenhouse gas impacts of each mode. It can get you a taxi or a shared ride (if regulators don't shut many of those down). It can show you traffic and transit delays.

Kraus wouldn't have gotten the same level of press if he had just said, "Your smartphone is going to be really useful for transportation." But while his statement might have been a lot of puffery, there's a fine line between saying that and a lot of people actually believing that the only thing you have to do to solve social problems is devise the perfect app.

Sometimes, an app or just cheaper technology can make a lot of people's lives better, but sometimes you also need other tools as well.

David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington and Greater Greater Education. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater. 

Comments

Add a comment »

Reminds me of this brilliant takedown of the technology-solves-everything mindset by Jarrett Walker:

http://www.humantransit.org/2011/07/los-angeles-gensler-architects-attack-citys-transit-future.html

by Alex B. on Oct 10, 2012 4:09 pm • linkreport

This is similar to people who are convinced all we need is a comprehensive PRT (or monorail, or self driving cars)system to really leave all other modes of travel in the dust.

by drumz on Oct 10, 2012 4:28 pm • linkreport

edit: which Alex B. (a la Jarrett Walker) seems to have also pointed out.

by drumz on Oct 10, 2012 4:29 pm • linkreport

Bravest thing d Alpert has written?

(next to the gray endorsement)

I don't think much of technological anarchists, but it can really change the balance of power.

by Charlie on Oct 10, 2012 5:15 pm • linkreport

This reminds me architects who say that archtecture must reflect the latest technology, no matter how fragile, energy consuming, or ugly. There seems to be a backlash developing against this constant sales job to upgrade one's technology or style, when it's just another incarnation of built-in obsolescence.

Looks cool for a while, but it isn't designed to age becasue they'll want to sell you another one soon enough.

by Thayer-D on Oct 10, 2012 8:47 pm • linkreport

This goes hand in hand with the TED crowd too.

by Fitz on Oct 11, 2012 11:01 am • linkreport

Stop hating. These are good ideas.

by Logan Guy on Oct 12, 2012 11:21 am • linkreport

Could we please see some text about what Prop E actually adds to the SF tax code or changes or repeals? What is it, another "High Tech" subsidy like DC's QHTC subsidy which gives away $4.8 million a year in tax revenues to tech outfits which don't need tax breaks?

by Green Eyeshade on Oct 17, 2012 12:11 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or