Greater Greater Washington

Government


Oh, right, the environment

Because this is an important issue, I'm splitting the stimulus section out of the lunch links. See the comments there for previous comments on the stimulus.


Photo by booleansplit on Flickr.

Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) chairs the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. She's a strong advocate for climate change legislation and for raising CAFE standards for automobiles. After substantial public blowback to her planned amendment adding $50 billion for roads to the stimulus, Boxer is reportedly reworking the amendment.

It will now allow states to spend the money on transit and some "fix it first" language to prioritize fixing crumbling roads over building new ones. However, the language remains "soft," relying on the administration to enforce and leaving states lots of potentially damaging wiggle room. Boxer is still working on the language, so it could get better or worse in the next day.

Talking Points Memo analyzes the lack of push for "fix it first" in the Senate. The article wonders if Boxer, who may have to defend her seat against Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2010, might be focusing on bringing money to California, environmental consequences be damned. However, Schwarzenegger opposes Bond's amendment to cut high-speed rail. Tell your Senators (if you have Senators) to oppose the Bond, Inhofe, and Boxer amendments.

Update: Senators Susan Collins (R-ME), Ben Nelson (D-NE), and some other centrist Senators have a list of cuts, including Amtrak and the somewhat mysterious transportation grants Bond wants to move to highways. According to TPM, the Senate may move forward today on the entire stimulus.

David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington and Greater Greater Education. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater. 

Comments

Don't necessarily agree with the Amtrak cuts (especially if it's capital/maintenance funding). But agree with Collins and Nelson that the stimulus bill is too big and needs to be pared down. And IMO, the bill is still way too infrastructure-light.

by Froggie on Feb 5, 2009 4:42 pm • linkreport

The stimulus has evolved into an omnibus spending bill. Infrastructure should have been at least 3/4 of that bill. Imagine $300 billion going to mass transit. In 20 years, we would have a different america.

by staypuftman on Feb 5, 2009 5:30 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or