Links
Breakfast links: Veterans
Thank you, veterans: Today, on Veterans' Day, Americans honor those who have served our country in the armed forces. To our readers who are veterans, thank you very much for your service. Please post in the comments so we can thank you personally.
Post not local enough: The Washington Post ombudsman says the paper doesn't have enough local coverage. There are a lot of jurisdictions in the region with different issues and needs, but they all deserve detailed coverage, he says.
Fairfax court goes light on speeding, DUI: At one recent session of Fairfax City court, the Town Attorney recommended very light punishments for egregious speeders and even for drunk drivers. (FABB)
Efficient transit = expensive housing?: A new Brookings report finds that most parts of the DC region are well-served by transit, but the places with the best transit access also have the highest housing costs. (DCist)
Restonians want less Silver Line TOD: A Reston group says the development planned around the Silver Line will bring too much traffic. County plans called for mixed-use development, but a task force suggests curtailing commercial growth. (Examiner)
3 townhouses won't be parking: The Mayor's Agent for Historic Preservation won't allow a Mount Vernon Square church to demolish 3 rowhouses for surface parking. The church argued they're too expensive to fix; others said it could sell them. (DCmud)
And...: 80% of transit-related ballot initiatives passed this year. (Streetsblog) ... Watch a video of one day of Vancouver's transit network. (Human Transit) ... Philadelphia's center city housing market has been more resilient than the suburbs. (Streetsblog)
Have a tip for the links? Submit it here.
Comments
Cyclists are special and do have their own rules
- Cyclists are special and do have their own rules
- M Street cycle track keeps improving, draws church anger
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools
- O'Malley announces first projects using new gas tax money
- ICC losing bus service in classic bait and switch
- Can Loudoun grow while protecting its rural areas?
- Silver Spring mall could get massive facelift, new name
Tue May 21
Sun May 26
11:00 am Roosevelt Ride in Greenbelt
Sat Jun 1
10:00 am CSG walking tour of Wheaton





According to the Beakfast Links 160% of transit issues passed.
by Jasper on Nov 12, 2012 9:35 am • link • report
Bikes, as usual, were fantastic.
by SJE on Nov 12, 2012 9:49 am • link • report
by John Muller on Nov 12, 2012 9:58 am • link • report
by selxic on Nov 12, 2012 10:01 am • link • report
Today that is true, traffic is less in Springfield but it is because the business and retail community is dying from complete disconnection and isolation from the rest of the area. Lack of investment and growth means that new projects and the public improvements they bring have all but died and the area has remained a stagnant over paved abandoned parking lot.
I hope Reston recognizes that in planning it is about balance and doesn't go down the path of Springfield
by Tysons Engineer on Nov 12, 2012 10:05 am • link • report
by drumz on Nov 12, 2012 10:06 am • link • report
by Jeremy on Nov 12, 2012 10:20 am • link • report
That really stood out when browsing the cases, Jeremy.
by selxic on Nov 12, 2012 10:31 am • link • report
Go look at an aerial picture of the Springfield region between 1995 and today. Hardly any changes other than the mixing bowl. That is sad considering Springfields central location and business history.
by Tysons Engineer on Nov 12, 2012 10:33 am • link • report
by charlie on Nov 12, 2012 10:35 am • link • report
It must be nice problem to have .... other areas will gladly take your commercial development
by jcp on Nov 12, 2012 10:36 am • link • report
by Tysons Engineer on Nov 12, 2012 10:39 am • link • report
This underscores the whole fallacy of the Silver Line. Reston is at least a decade away from being a good place for TOD (with Herndon and Ashburn even further). There is plenty of supply coming on board in Tysons. Overdeveloping the western part of the line will lead to oversupply and no one will be happy.
by movement on Nov 12, 2012 10:59 am • link • report
Yesterday, took Dad to Applebee's for lunch. Today, breakfast over at Denny's.
by Drake Perth on Nov 12, 2012 11:01 am • link • report
1) That which is external to Fairfax (DC and Arlington, which btw the number of residents in Fairfax which work in DC and Arlington is less than the number of residents that work inside of Fairfax which is why Fairfax does not follow traditional suburban concepts)
2) That which is in eastern and southern Fairfax (Tysons centric which is very much the consultant industry in support of government functions in DC as well as accounting, banking, retail, health care industries)
3) That which is fairly isolated from DC and more closely related to companies central to Dulles (shipping support, transportation, developers/construction, biotech, telecomm, and software/hardware engineering)
You cant just say, Reston is further west than Tysons and therefore less of a spillover from DC, that simply is not what is happening in Fairfax regardless of how many DC residents on WaPo's comment board want to believe it is
by Tysons Engineer on Nov 12, 2012 11:04 am • link • report
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20121112/us-super-bowl-streetcar/
by Tom Coumaris on Nov 12, 2012 11:53 am • link • report
Fair enough but there is no way to create transit infrastructure around Reston or points west in the Dulles Corridor. The suburbs are too decentralized and it will take decades to reverse that trend. With DC you have a nexus that can support a hub and spoke system. There is no nexus in Northern Fairfax. Tysons could be one eventually but it will take more than a decade.
by movement on Nov 12, 2012 1:36 pm • link • report
This is old news, but the problem keeps getting worse and worse. Just a couple of weeks ago the WaPo killed the Maryland Politics Blog (along with DC and VA) and replaced it with a "MD Politics Page" which is a joke, and has far fewer articles. Radio stations like WTOP, local papers like the MoCo/Frederick Co./PGC Gazette, the Baltimore Sun, and even the right-wing Examiner provide far better local coverage.
RE: Efficient transit = expensive housing?
Really? In other news, it was discovered that fish swim in water.
by King Terrapin on Nov 12, 2012 2:11 pm • link • report
The Post is a national newspaper similar to the NY Times (which is why I never get people who live in DC and subscribe to the NY Times). There are plenty of other outletsfor local news like this blog. There's no reason the WaPo has to cover a lot of local news. We should be proud to live in an area with one of only a handful of nationally recognized newspapers of record.
by Falls Church on Nov 12, 2012 2:36 pm • link • report
The Times does a hell of a lot more to cover local news in New York than the Post does in DC and environs.
Being a national paper of record is one thing. I don't see how that should prevent better local reporting. Likewise, the Post's record on national reporting isn't as strong as it could be. Hell, they basically had the idea for Politico handed to them, yet they turned it down.
http://www.vanityfair.com/business/2012/04/washington-post-watergate
by Alex B. on Nov 12, 2012 2:45 pm • link • report
Resources are limited and newspapers are a dying industry. Every dollar spent on local reporting is a dollar not spent on national reporting. That's how an emphasis on national reporting prevents better local reporting.
The Times has more revenue and a bigger budget than the WaPo. So, they can afford to have more reporters/bureaus, covering a wider array of news, like local happenings and fashion.
Likewise, the Post's record on national reporting isn't as strong as it could be.
Of course, there's always room for improvement. But, its reputation is better than the NY Times when it comes to unbiased, balanced, and truthful reporting. It's also widely regarded to have the best political coverage.
Look, I like local news as much as the next person (actually, moreso) but I think it's pretty cool that we live in an area with one of only four remaining national newspapers (WaPo, NYT, USA Today, and WSJ). I'd hate to see the WaPo become just another town-based paper like the Houston Chronicle, which no one cares about outside of Houston. Especially, when DC already has such a plethora of great local news coverage from DCist, WTOP, Patch, Washington Examiner, GGW, etc.
While Warren Buffet is right -- the future of the newspaper industry is in local coverage -- I certainly hope there will be national newspapers like the WaPo for some time to come.
by Falls Church on Nov 12, 2012 4:08 pm • link • report
Did you read that VF piece I linked?
Resources are limited and newspapers are a dying industry. Every dollar spent on local reporting is a dollar not spent on national reporting. That's how an emphasis on national reporting prevents better local reporting.
You say this like it's a given - part of the reason the resources are dwindling is that the Post's revenue that forms that pool of resources is from print circulation - which, unlike the Times, is almost entirely local. And one key thing local subscribers are complaining about is the shrinking local coverage! Pexton quotes a reader noting that the Post need not be delivered to his stoop, the paper is almost thin enough now to slide under his door.
The Times has more revenue and a bigger budget than the WaPo. So, they can afford to have more reporters/bureaus, covering a wider array of news, like local happenings and fashion.
Yes, the Times has a bigger budget, but I think you're confusing the correlation and causation here.
Of course, there's always room for improvement. But, its reputation is better than the NY Times when it comes to unbiased, balanced, and truthful reporting. It's also widely regarded to have the best political coverage.
What reputation is better than the Times? Are we talking newsroom, or ed board?
And, as noted in the VF piece, the Post's political coverage is a shell of what it could be. The Politico founders pitched the idea to management, and they rejected it. Now they're playing catch-up to a great degree.
I'd hate to see the WaPo become just another town-based paper like the Houston Chronicle, which no one cares about outside of Houston.
Those papers become parochial because they run nothing but AP national stories. The Post is in danger with the locals because they are running AP local stories.
Nobody is saying they should give up their national niche. That said, I think you're painting the Post into a false choice if you think they can do national or local, but not both.
by Alex B. on Nov 12, 2012 4:23 pm • link • report
by Jasper on Nov 12, 2012 4:33 pm • link • report
by Phil on Nov 12, 2012 4:34 pm • link • report
They also did a study a few years ago of people under 30 and I think the conclusion was people would pay NOT to have paper delivered. They are also the founders of one of the biggest recyclers in the area.
The NYTIMES for the first time is making more on subscriptions than ads. I suspect that is the future. However, I strongly suspect the Post will wither away unless there is a change in control.
by charlie on Nov 12, 2012 5:03 pm • link • report
by Dave Murphy on Nov 12, 2012 6:52 pm • link • report
by David Alpert on Nov 12, 2012 6:54 pm • link • report
by Greenbelt Gal on Nov 12, 2012 7:26 pm • link • report
by selxic on Nov 13, 2012 7:47 am • link • report
Add a Comment