Roads
DDOT may include bikes and pedestrians on Broad Branch
The badly deteriorated Broad Branch Road in northwest Washington could become a more complete street that will accommodate pedestrians and cyclists as well as drivers, as part of a much-needed restoration.
Winding west from Rock Creek to Chevy Chase, the 2-mile-long route does double duty for recreation and commuting. It's necessary link between upper northwest's neighborhoods, Rock Creek Park, and downtown.
Originally a market road for local farmers, most of its current infrastructure dates to the early 20th century. Patchwork fixes have only staved off a century of deterioration. Flooding has undermined the road's substructure, most dramatically in 2011, when the bridge over Soapstone Creek collapsed. Since it needs to replace the roadbed anyway, DDOT has taken the opportunity to update the design for modern uses.
Three constituencies use the road regularly: motorists, cyclists, and joggers. The first has no real difficulty using the road, but the road and its bridges were built for smaller cars going slower. The road, after all, was originally a market path for local farmers.
Cyclists can use the road, but they have to keep to a quick pace. It's not suitable for children, deterring families from using their neighborhood parkland. Finally, there are no real facilities for joggers, let alone walkers, but they have to skirt the roadway to access Soapstone Valley, which feeds Broad Branch.
That means that currently, the Broad Branch only optimally serves motorists, mostly during rush hour. Early community outreach has produced 4 options for an Environmental Assessment. Beyond the no-action alternative, one proposal is to simply rebuild the road, altering it to improve safety and reduce the footprint.
A third alternative would add a sidewalk, while the most substantial would include a full-length bike lane in the uphill direction as well as the sidewalk. All rebuilding options would all include stormwater retention gardens and contextually-appropriate safety walls.
Of the alternatives, only the fourth takes advantage of the route's potential. A quiet, wooded route with a low grade is ideal for use by cyclists and pedestrians. For commuters, Alternative 4 is ideal. It includes a 4' bike lane in the uphill direction of traffic, but not one downhill.
Given the narrow right-of-way, this option is the best use of space, because cyclists on Broad Branch can often move with traffic going downhill, but only the most athletic can sustain 25mph uphill for two miles.
Making Broad Branch more convenient for cyclists will open up large swaths of upper northwest to sustainable forms of commuting. Residents won't have to huff and puff up the hills and ridges that make Upper Northwest so exhaustingly "upper." Cycling neighbors could practically coast all the way in via the bike path along Rock Creek and comfortably ride home.
The bike lane and sidewalk will also benefit locals looking for recreation in their own neighborhood. Most of Rock Creek is surrounded by steep escarpments that make access to it difficult and dangerous for residents on either end of the age spectrum. A paved sidewalk on the easy slope of Broad Branch will increase accessibility dramatically for a wide range of abilities. The valley itself would also be more usable to residents, making it more of an amenity than it currently is.
A criticism of alternative 4 is that it encroaches on the streambed and increases the amount of paving along the road. These issues should be addressed with design elements that reduce runoff. Signage at the rain gardens, as well as other sites of interest would provide an opportunity for interpretation of the park, history, and the impact of urbanization. More importantly, by making alternative modes of commuting more convenient, a complete Broad Branch road would reduce automobile pollution.
To make the most impact this project needs to be part of a larger network. The sidewalk bill is one part of this. Any plans should take into consideration the opportunity to calm traffic and improve safety by adding bike lanes on the unnecessarily wide Nevada Avenue, which is the extension of Broad Branch up a former stream valley. The potential of a Broad Branch that serves all uses should not be passed over.
Because the road needs to be so radically rebuilt, the opportunity to make these changes will not come again for many years. It is important that the road meet the ecologically sensitive needs of the population 50 years from now. Rebuilding it as a car-only route would be a serious mistake.
DDOT is interested in hearing from the public. To make that easy, any comments you post here will automatically also go to the project email address.
Comments
- Long-term closures: A solution to single-tracking?
- Metro policy for refunds after delays falls short, riders say
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools
- M Street cycle track keeps improving, draws church anger
- Bikeshare is a gateway to private biking, not competition
- Cyclists are special and do have their own rules
- O'Malley announces first projects using new gas tax money



















by Dan Miller on Nov 29, 2012 1:46 pm • link • report
I strongly encourage them to include bicycile and foot paths in the plan for a rebuilt Broad Branch.
Does the National Park Service need to buy-in as well, since they manage the park itself?
by Adam on Nov 29, 2012 1:54 pm • link • report
There is a nice piece on this issue here:
http://www.foresthillsconnection.com/news/broad-branch-road-rehab-what-do-you-think/
And there is a survey embedded in the 2nd paragraph which I hope folks will go and take - I voted for Alternative 4.
by TomQ on Nov 29, 2012 2:17 pm • link • report
I hope, however, that DDoT is prepared for the wrathful opposition that I'm sure some loud voices in my neighborhood will rain down on this.
by LM on Nov 29, 2012 2:22 pm • link • report
by SJE on Nov 29, 2012 2:54 pm • link • report
yes on a bike going downhill you can get a good speed up, but going downhill is also among the highest risk places for crash and injury on a bike. What if a want to ride my brakes downhill? No place for me? Shared use is not a good answer ("ride the sidewalk") - we know empirically that both bikers and pedestrians are safer when they are not forced to share a path.
by Tina on Nov 29, 2012 2:59 pm • link • report
by LM on Nov 29, 2012 4:09 pm • link • report
by Some Ideas on Nov 29, 2012 4:12 pm • link • report
by jimble on Nov 29, 2012 6:19 pm • link • report
by William on Nov 29, 2012 8:46 pm • link • report
by Neil Flanagan on Nov 29, 2012 8:57 pm • link • report
by Johnny on Nov 30, 2012 12:34 pm • link • report
It would be wonderful to accommodate all travel modes. But can that be done while safeguarding the environment...is there money in the budget for such a project...and can the project be completed in a way that shuts down a significant thoroughfare for the shortest period possible?
One thing that is not stressed enough in these plans is fixing the basic infrastructure in advance of Broad Branch Road falling into the creek (as it threatens to do). This roadway, built in 1839, is the oldest road in the surrounding area that still goes anywhere. A slightly older historic route, Klingle Road, was allowed to deteriorate - so some users of Broad Branch are skeptical of DDOT's plans and whether the process will take so long that it becomes moot.
To me, the first priority is to ensure the road's integrity while protecting the creek. The second priority is to allow safe access on foot to the Soapstone Valley Trail. The more complex alternatives should only be considered if DDOT can tackle such a project in an environmentally-sound, affordable and expeditious manner.
by David Swerdloff on Dec 1, 2012 6:05 pm • link • report
Yes.
is there money in the budget for such a project.
There is money available. There's no budget yet, but the money is there if this project is approved.
and can the project be completed in a way that shuts down a significant thoroughfare for the shortest period possible?
Yes. But obviously, it won't be. Because doing that would require 100 crews working 24 hours a day (think Extreme Makeover Home Edition). So it will be done as fast as is reasonable, right up to the point where the cost of going faster outweigh the benefits.
by David C on Dec 1, 2012 10:39 pm • link • report
Shoehorning in the wider right of way seems more problematic to me. And, if budget is not going to be a problem, why hasn't there ever been money in the past to fix Broad Branch Road, which has been slowly crumbling and regularly flooding during the 27 years I've lived a few blocks away?
I hope he is right - and that the Full Monty can be accomplished before the road becomes impassable. But the proposals, no matter how wonderful they appear, have not come with details on the environmental impact or cost.
It's not as if I want the cheapest alternative. That's what we got when we finally succeeded in getting a hiking/biking path down Blagden Avenue. The result was a path that is hard for bicycles to access and an intersection at Beach Drive that remains dangerous to cross. It was a bad solution that was very long in coming. So I'm not so confident about what they can build along Broad Branch...and when.
by David Swerdloff on Dec 2, 2012 1:12 am • link • report
by Diane on Dec 2, 2012 9:42 am • link • report
I also hike or run on a loop route that takes me from the Melvin Hazen Trail to the Soapstone Valley trail. These two beautiful trails are some of DC's best-kept secrets, but unfortunately the only way to get from one to the other involves walking on a stretch of Broad Branch Parkway with no shoulder or sidewalk. I've had more than one close call there, and having a safe way to do that loop on foot would make a wonderful amenity even better.
by Herb Caudill on Dec 3, 2012 2:27 pm • link • report
There has been money. What has been missing is the political will to get it done. And I didn't say budget wouldn't be a problem. I said DC has the money. Those are two different things.
by David C on Dec 3, 2012 4:18 pm • link • report
And though this falls somewhat outside of the parameters for this project, DDOT and DDOE need to begin collaborating on stormwater retention projects around Soapstone Creek and other tributaries. The bridge failure last year was due in part to the severe flooding of Soapstone Creek, and during every major storm event, debris is washed up onto Broad Branch Road. The DC Govt must stop using these waterways as
dumping sites for its stormwater.
by DCT on Dec 3, 2012 8:37 pm • link • report
by Richard Mounts on Dec 4, 2012 6:58 pm • link • report
Add a Comment