Politics
Frumin, Settles, Silverman rise to the top on public safety
It's a photo finish for the at-large DC Council candidates' visions for how to address crime. The voting at Let's Choose DC ended in a near-tie between Matt Frumin and John Settles, with Elissa Silverman a very close third.
DC voters rated the responses of nine candidates to this question:
Chief Lanier and Mayor Gray have made a lot of the drop in homicides, but other crimesLet's Choose DC is presented by Greater Greater Washington, DCist, and PoPville and is open to all DC residents. Nine candidates provided responses. Five are still eligible for the April 23 ballot, while four have either dropped out of the race or did not file petitions by the deadline yesterday.— assaults, robberies — remain stubbornly high. How should DC police deal with those challenges, and do you have an opinion on how many officers MPD needs?
Mr. Frumin, Mr. Settles, and Ms. Silverman all had over 60% of participating voters rate their responses as persuasive or very persuasive. Mr. Frumin and Mr. Settles were almost perfectly tied; 65.43% of voters gave Mr. Frumin's response a positive rating, while 65.38% did so for Mr. Settles (62.63% did for Ms. Silverman).
Mr. Frumin also barely edged out Mr. Settles in percentage of voters rating his response "very persuasive," 20.2% to 19.9%. Ms. Silverman, meanwhile, got the highest proportion of votes for "very persuasive," 22.1%.
Three other candidates Mr. Redd has, however, joined in starting with question 3, on education, and you can read his response and those of the other 5 participating candidates still in the race. That includes the answer from Paul Zukerberg, which we did not have when the answers went live on Tuesday because, frankly, I messed up; I accidentally mis-copied and pasted the candidates' email addresses, and never sent Mr. Zukerberg the question.
He kindly rushed an answer to us, so even if you have already voted, please consider reading and rating his answer so we can fairly weigh his answer in the results for that question, which will come out next week.
If you haven't yet voted on the education question, please start voting today! You can vote until midnight Monday, at which point we'll have responses to question 4, on the District's growth.
Comments
- Bikeshare is a gateway to private biking, not competition
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools
- Long-term closures: A solution to single-tracking?
- Metro policy for refunds after delays falls short, riders say
- M Street cycle track keeps improving, draws church anger
- Cyclists are special and do have their own rules
- O'Malley announces first projects using new gas tax money







by William on Jan 24, 2013 1:04 pm • link • report
Maybe you need to read her responses again; I see lots of policy positions in her answers.
by MLD on Jan 24, 2013 1:12 pm • link • report
by Geoffrey Hatchard on Jan 24, 2013 1:12 pm • link • report
I have heard nothing from Bonds since the very start, when she said she wanted to participate and then has not communicated since.
by David Alpert on Jan 24, 2013 1:16 pm • link • report
by SM on Jan 24, 2013 1:22 pm • link • report
by Alan B. on Jan 24, 2013 1:26 pm • link • report
by David Alpert on Jan 24, 2013 1:27 pm • link • report
I'm quite bummed out that Brooks got out because I actually liked his delivery because it wasn't just a campaign slogan like some of the others. I don't really think there's much a comparison between his response and Silverman's so consider me confused. I mean really, being able to ask tough questions and being a lobbyist is considered a good answer? Is that what we're lacking? Tough questioners?
FWIW, I ran into issues attempting to figure out if the answers were repeats of things already in place or not. I'm hopeful that some of the things we're already doing.
by HogWash on Jan 24, 2013 2:34 pm • link • report
I don't think people disagree, but that also doesn't propose any actions or specific plans. Good intentions aren't enough to make good leaders.
by Alan B. on Jan 24, 2013 2:56 pm • link • report
by Bob on Jan 24, 2013 5:05 pm • link • report
Are you responding to a post that was deleted? Who said Brooks gave "concrete" answers? What "I" said is that I liked his better. A specific plan to use data to determine deployment seems like standard practice. How else does Lanier do it? I don't know the answer but does MPD really not do this already? If not, that's some shiggity.
I do know that I've personally witnessed an increase in foot/bike patrols in my part of town.
by HogWash on Jan 24, 2013 5:29 pm • link • report
by Brian Pate on Feb 6, 2013 10:55 pm • link • report
Add a Comment