Roads
Floor debates begin on flawed McDonnell transportation bills
Governor McDonnell's transportation funding bills (HB2313 and SB 1355) are on the floor of the Virginia House and Senate today and tomorrow. The McDonnell Administration is facing objections on many fronts, but the Republican majority quickly pushed the bills through committee.
Votes to pass the bills must take place before "cross-over" on midnight Tuesday in order for them to survive and cross over to the other chamber.
Many legislators, both Republicans and Democrats, will seek amendments on the floor, but observers believe that the Governor and leadership want to push the bills into a closed-door conference committee where the Republican majority will control crafting the final bill. That means the best opportunity for major amendments is now.
If you are concerned about these bills, you can get the latest from the Coalition for Smarter Growth, contact your elected officials, and monitor @csgstewart and @betterDCregion for a Twitter play-by-play.
Without critical amendments, the bill that ultimately emerges from the conference committee is unlikely to be a good deal for Northern Virginia or other metropolitan areas of the state. The McDonnell administration has squandered much of the $3 billion in borrowed funds the legislature authorized in 2011. The governor spent it on highway projects in rural areas, while neglecting funding for Dulles Rail, Tysons Corner, and Hampton Roads' top priorities Prominent among the McDonnell Administration's wasteful projects have been Route 460, the Coalfields Expressway, Charlottesville Bypass and the Outer Beltway. If Virginia continues to pursue these projects it could waste a combined $5.5 billion, but if the legislature makes review and reevaluation of these projects a condition of new funding, there's still a chance to redeploy the funds to real transportation needs.
Eliminating all taxes on gasoline, the centerpiece of McDonnell's bill, could make traffic in our metro areas worse, reducing transit use and increasing driving. It cuts the sensible tie between transportation use and funding, forcing Virginians who drive less to subsidize those who drive more, hurting seniors and low-income people, carpoolers, transit users, those who live closer to their jobs.
Switching to the sales tax could also make Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads further subsidize long-distance driving throughout the state. It would also divert state general funds essential for education, health care, public safety and conservation.
Without amendments to ensure the Virginia Department of Transportation sets better priorities, there is no guarantee in these bills to meet the needs of the metro areas or the state's growing transit needs. There is no guarantee these bills will restore funding for local roads; for the past 2 years, VDOT has zeroed out funding for secondary roads in localities despite record transportation spending.
Fortunately, nearly all of the Democrats and a number of Republicans believe that eliminating all taxes on gasoline is a bad idea. Opposition to the idea also extends from the smart growth community to the Wall Street Journal.
On January 15, a Wall Street Journal editorial argued that McDonnell's scheme "violates the user-pays principle" of sound public finance: Without these amendments, the legislature should reject the Governor's bills and new funding for the state transportation agencies.
Here's a more detailed breakdown of where we find nearly $5.5 billion in waste:
[It] would mean that a Virginia resident who may not even own a car has to pay more for road repairs when he buys a cell phone, computer or Big Mac. Motorists who benefit most from the roads would pay almost nothing directly to use them... [F]unding transportation through a sales tax "makes roads free," at least in terms of direct payments, and thus will lead to more driving and more gridlock
Let's hope the legislature rejects the Governor's proposal to eliminate the gas tax. We hope the legislature will vote for the following amendments:
Comments
- Bikeshare is a gateway to private biking, not competition
- Short-term Washingtonians deserve a voice, too
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools
- Long-term closures: A solution to single-tracking?
- Public land deals have both benefits and pitfalls
- PG planners propose bold new smart growth future
- DC Council makes major policy changes overnight







by TMT on Feb 4, 2013 4:36 pm • link • report
The sales tax is equally easy to determine for the average person in NOVA who spends $1000 per month (estimate on low limit) an 8point (0.008) increase represents $96 per year, those who spend $1500 per month (general spending) $144 per year, and those who spend $2000 per month (high limit) $192.
Now add in the fact that many households in inner suburbs have only one car (like myself) but two combined spending) and you see that this modification increases taxes on those individual by 3 or 4 times what they pay now.
by Tysons Engineer on Feb 4, 2013 5:07 pm • link • report
by Tysons Engineer on Feb 4, 2013 5:08 pm • link • report
------
Is there ANY road ever proposed that Mr. Schwartz or the Coalition For Smarter growth hasn't opposed and called "wasteful" or "unnecessary"?
by ceefer66 on Feb 4, 2013 7:53 pm • link • report
Even worse, it helps people like my dad. He is a home inspector, makes a very good living, but drives 20,000-25,000 miles a year. My mom drives into DC with a hybrid that gets ~25 miles to the gallon. They are both heavy road users, and are both on the road during rush hour, and they will pay less under the new system. Such a terrible idea.
Oh, and under this scenario, I will pay nothing. Living in DC, would mean I would get to get cheap gas and contribute nothing to VA's roads, all the while happily continuing to shop at the DC costco, which is now markedly cheaper than Northern Virginia, due to the parity in sales tax, and no grocery tax.
by Kyle-w on Feb 4, 2013 7:59 pm • link • report
Well when all the proposed routes are bad compared to improving transit then yeah.
Unless you feel billions on redundant roads who's primary beneficiaries are truckers are looking to avoid some stopligts is better than helping people in populated areas get to work a little easier then yeah it doesn't make sense.
by Drumz on Feb 4, 2013 9:43 pm • link • report
Maybe, just perhaps, the lack of redundant roads is one reason why the DC region consistently ranks number 1 in traffic congestion.
We cancel roads and kid ourselves that "mass transit" is the solution to all our needs.
The nation's worse-congested traffic is the result.
by ceefer66 on Feb 5, 2013 12:37 pm • link • report
Other than the HOT lane proposal from Edsall to the Pentagon, a fairly debatable proposition, what roads have been canceled due to anti road sentiment in Northern Virginia, lately, that would reduce congestion?
by AWalkerInTheCity on Feb 5, 2013 12:44 pm • link • report
Add a Comment