The Washington, DC region is great >> and it can be greater.

Public Spaces

Green jobs should be part of Clean Rivers

DC residents and business owners are footing the bill to fix the city's outdated stormwater infrastructure. Let's get green jobs in the bargain.

Stormwater runoff is a byproduct of our developing city. We've turned much of our land into paved streets, parking lots, sidewalks and rooftops; when it rains, millions of gallons of water rush into our antiquated storm-sewer system, which causes flooding and sends untreated sewage and other pollutants into area rivers.

The city entered into a legal agreement with the EPA in 2005 to end sewer overflows into the Potomac, Anacostia, and Rock Creek waterways by 2025. To meet this goal DC Water developed the $2.6 billion Clean Rivers Project, which will fix and replace the DC's outdated storm sewer system.

The project is being financed almost exclusively by DC residents, which means that by 2019 the average resident's monthly DC water bill will exceed $100. However, few DC residents are getting jobs as a result of this massive spending.

According to DC Water's most recent employment report, 85 employees on DC Water projects live in North Carolina, more than the 63 employees who live in Wards 7 and 8. It's time to seriously consider how we get the most bang for our collective buck: clean rivers and green jobs.

Reducing and ultimately eliminating sewage overflows into our rivers is the primary focus of the Clean Rivers Project, but it doesn't have to be the only return we see on this massive investment of ratepayer money. With political will and imagination, we could use these billions of dollars to create thousands of living wage green jobs and spur green neighborhood revitalization across the city as well.

Late last year, DC Water entered into a preliminary partnership agreement with the EPA to explore green infrastructure as an alternative to the current big-tunnel approach. Solutions could include rain gardens, green roofs, and pervious pavers, which unlike traditional pavement allows water to filter through to the ground below.

This could create thousands of living wage, career-track jobs digging rain gardens, planting trees and maintaining green roofs. Our initial research suggests that investing $40 million a year in green infrastructure could create more than 300 living wage jobs.

DC Water could divert hundreds of millions of dollars into green infrastructure over the next 12 years. These green jobs would go a long way to dealing with stubborn unemployment numbers in wards 5, 7, and 8 and create new tax revenue for the city.

However, these green jobs won't reach unemployed DC residents unless the leaders at DC Water make it a priority. We need an organized base of ratepayers, job-seekers, businesses and environmentalists holding city leaders accountable for training and preparing unemployed DC workers for these green jobs and holding contractors and DC Water and its contractors accountable for hiring them.

Focusing on green job creation in the Clean Rivers Project will also broaden public support for green infrastructure—public support that can make sure green infrastructure projects get done. DC Water will inevitably face hurdles navigating DC's maze of local, federal and private land to install hundreds of acres of green infrastructure. They will need long-term city-wide resident buy-in to hold local and federal government and agencies accountable for working together to fund, build, and maintain these projects.

With political will, green infrastructure can be a viable solution to our stormwater problems. Our organization, the Washington Interfaith Network, a local citizen power organization made up of faith, labor and community based organizations, is building a citywide coalition supporting green infrastructure in the Clean Rivers Project. We would like it to include a clear comprehensive plan for green job creation and neighborhood revitalization along with river restoration.

On Earth Day 2013, we will gather 800 neighborhood leaders at Temple Sinai, next to Rock Creek Park, with officials from DC Water and City Council to make public commitments for creating such a plan in the next six months. With $2.6 billion in debt to pay back, we can't afford to do otherwise.

Jahi Wise is an Associate Organizer with the Washington Interfaith Network, a multi-race, multi-faith, multi-ethnic citizen's power organization rooted in Washington, DC neighborhoods. He lives in Brightwood Park.  


Add a comment »

Do you any other places to meet?

It is discordant to write about the need for jobs in wards 7 and 8, and then hold a rally in a very wealthy synagogue, accessible only by car, in ward 3.

by goldfish on Apr 18, 2013 11:41 am • linkreport

I am an organizer with WIN. We are a citywide organization working to build a citywide alliance of residents around green jobs. We have worked hard to make the event accessible to all wards and have coordinated buses and carpools from all parts of the city to the event. Please feel free to reach out if you want to join us on one of the buses / carpools from ward 8,7,6,5,4,2, or 1.

by Amy Vruno on Apr 18, 2013 12:39 pm • linkreport

I'm trying to find reference to the position of local/national environmental organizations on the two main alternative compliance strategies. My (faulty) memory is that enviros strongly prefer the big construction project because it will almost guarantee separation of stormwater and sewage water. As such, it guarantees to a very high degree the decrease in environmental degration and improvement in stream quality. They may have opposed slating green options for a larger role because it is a decentralized approach with little enforcement that would lead to assurance of the protecting/improving the environment. The unions, locally very strong, supported the big project as these will certainly be union jobs. The others might or might not (mostly not). The politicians seemed to dive for cover. But isn't there a consent agreement or court order that mandates the primary role for the big engineered/construction/deep tunnel project? If you spend those billions on the deep tunnel, is there ALSO money for significant green job projects?

by Tom M on Apr 18, 2013 12:57 pm • linkreport

Ah, yes. The environmental community did oppose the alternatives to the deep tunnel(s) (Actually 3 tunnels). The head of the DC environmental agency filed comments with USEPA opposing in effect the green projects alternative. Not all local pols sat on the side line. FOr example, Mayor Gray (One City Baby!) had the city administrator (Lew) fire the head of DDOE precisely for those comments.
Here's the Dec 2012 WaPo article.... Has something changed?

by Tom M on Apr 18, 2013 1:14 pm • linkreport

goldfish, I was going to call you out on being overly dramatic, but nope you are spot on for this one. What a bizarre location for a public meeting on clean rivers.

Also it seems like they should actually push the local programs I've never heard them advertised anywhere. Seems like they would have much better returns on the local jobs front.

by Alan B. on Apr 18, 2013 1:58 pm • linkreport

Well its next to Rock Creek Park which is one of the waterways explictly named for improvement. Plus apparently they need space for 800 people. I think we can discuss the larger issue and not worry too much about the location of the event.

by drumz on Apr 18, 2013 2:05 pm • linkreport

"What a bizarre location for a public meeting on clean rivers"

A Reform Synagogue that probably loves enviro causes, and interfaith stuff of all kinds - and happens to be close Rock Creek. Yeah, I just can't imagine having an interfaith meeting relating to clean water there.


Sure there might be more transit friendly locales - but haven't we been told many times that folks EOTR love to drive?

by VosMachtaYid on Apr 18, 2013 2:07 pm • linkreport

Woud the author want jobs on the Purple line limited to Maryland residents? How about jobs building the Wilson Bridge limited to Virginia and Maryland residents?

by Transit Guy on Apr 18, 2013 3:07 pm • linkreport

"Sure there might be more transit friendly locales - but haven't we been told many times that folks EOTR love to drive?"

Was that sarcasm?

If not, maybe someone needs to tell you that car ownership rates in Wards 7 and 8 are amongst the lowest in the city, as covered in this blog (rates were near 50% as recently as early 2012, according to a GGW piece).

by washingtonian on Apr 19, 2013 2:03 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

You can use some HTML, like <blockquote>quoting another comment</blockquote>, <i>italics</i>, and <a href="http://url_here">hyperlinks</a>. More here.

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.


Support Us