Greater Greater Washington

DC Sustainable Energy Utility saves energy and creates jobs

Five years ago, the DC Council created the DC Sustainable Energy Utility to help the city's growing population use less energy. While it hasn't been perfect, DC SEU can help achieve Mayor Gray's goal of cutting the District's energy use in half by 2032.


Photo by Dept of Energy Solar Decathlon on Flickr.

Created by the Clean and Affordable Energy Act of 2008 and housed within the District Department of the Environment, DC SEU is dedicated to reducing the District's energy footprint. Residents and business owners directly support DC SEU through a surcharge on their electricity and natural gas bills.

In return. DC SEU will give residents reduced-price compact fluorescent light bulbs, rebates for energy-efficient appliances, or even install better insulation and duct sealing in homes. For commercial and industrial properties, which are the District's largest energy users, DC SEU provides incentives and technical assistance for large-scale commercial properties and offers rebates for energy-efficient commercial equipment and lighting.

While states like Vermont, Ohio, and Delaware have sustainable energy utilities, DC SEU is the only one that measures success in terms of both energy savings and economic development. In 2012, DC SEU served 18,795 households in 2012, 60% of which are low-income, and spent $5.2 million with locally-owned Certified Business Enterprises, or CBEs. DC SEU claims that its customers save almost $3 million annually in energy costs, while its efficiency measures produce lifetime economic benefits of almost $24 million.

However, not everyone is convinced of DC SEU's effectiveness. Employees of the utility's vaunted green jobs program, which was supposed to create 100 new jobs every year, say their work was unproductive and "meaningless." Perhaps more can be done to strengthen the training and future job placement aspects of the jobs offered through DC SEU, but one lone program can't be expected to squelch the District's persistent plague of unemployment.

Meanwhile, critics argue that DC SEU has accomplished little other than self-promotion. There certainly seems to be room for better cooperation between DC SEU and pre-existing community organizations promoting solar power installation. But there's always a learning curve when government takes over tasks previously in the purview of the private sector, no matter how poorly Pepco did at promoting efficiency, especially when Pepco owns the power lines and metering systems.

We'll be able to get a better understanding of what DC SEU has accomplished with newly available data on how much electricity, water, and gas buildings in the District consume. DC has assessed the energy and water use and carbon emissions of every District-owned building every year since 2009, but this is the first year that private owners of commercial buildings larger than 100,000 square feet are required to report their energy and water use to DDOE in compliance with new benchmarking regulation. Next year, the requirement will extend to all commercial and multifamily residential buildings larger than 50,000 square feet.

For the past two years, the DC SEU has provided a Benchmarking Help Center assist owners of large buildings assess and report energy and water use. They have fielded more questions about medical offices and small retail outlets in multifamily apartment buildings and condominiums than expected.

"We walk by these buildings every day, but we don't think about how they operate, how much energy or water they use or what's inside," says Help Center spokesperson John Andreoni. "Through the release of benchmarked and reported data, we'll gain access to this information."

This wealth of public data will increase transparency in the market and provide a more complete picture of DC buildings' energy, water, and carbon footprints than has ever been produced. As more efficiency measures are implemented, we'll be able to see how effective DC SEU actually is.

In most industries, it costs less per unit to produce greater quantities of a product. But with energy, the reverse is true. That's why investing in conservation at the consumer level is the most prudent way for governments to reduce energy use and save users money. Not only is efficiency more effective for ratepayers and taxpayers than building new power plants, even ones using renewable sources, it's also better for the environment.

Armed with more public data, DC SEU will have more information at hand to shrink the District's resource consumption and encourage building owners and managers to embrace energy efficiency. If it achieves measurable success, it will not only trim the city's environmental footprint, but keep costs low for all District ratepayers.

Support us: Monthly   Yearly   One time
Greatest supporter—$250/year
Greater supporter—$100/year
Great supporter—$50/year
Or pick your own amount: $/year
Greatest supporter—$250
Greater supporter—$100
Great supporter—$50
Supporter—$20
Or pick your own amount: $
Want to contribute by mail or another way? Instructions are here.
Contributions to Greater Greater Washington are not tax deductible.

Malcolm Kenton lives in the DC neighborhood of Bloomingdale. Hailing from Greensboro, NC and a graduate of Guilford College, he is a passionate advocate for world-class passenger rail and other forms of sustainable transportation, and for incorporating nature and low-impact design into the urban fabric. The views he expresses on GGW are his own. 

Comments

Add a comment »

There are a lot of gaps here.

It is great thee are benchmarking protocols in place.

And on the low income side, anything to get landlords to fix up crappy units is a good thing.

That being said, I don't see how giving away light bulbs is going to help. Ultiamtley, energy is a system, which Malcom kind of gets around to mentioning. But changing the incentives on some very small players -- and that is what a CFL does -- isn't going to do much on the system. Hell, even stuff like LEEDs aren't going to make a difference as long as owners are keeping the buildings conditioned/lit 24/7.

And while reducing electric/NG usage is noble, it doesn't really do much to lower prices. Again, I see his point -- the peak electric usage is the most expensive, but that is already being priced in by the consumer and power companies. In shorter terms, PEPCO has a huge interest in reducing the peak and their expenses but I don't see a public interest.

by charlie on May 6, 2013 3:54 pm • linkreport

I don't see a public interest.

Less energy usage and all the pollution that comes with it?

Not to mention, if we're talking low income people maybe helping them save $25 a year on their power bill is a good thing.

by MLD on May 6, 2013 3:59 pm • linkreport

@MLD; the power from the PJM grid is all over the mid-atlantic and midwest. If anything, switching peak power over to wind is probably more of win than anything.

So again -- it is in the interest of PEPCO to reduce peak usage and therefore reduce their costs.

And if you want to save low income people $25 there are far more direct routes. Just give them a credit on a month's power bill in april or october.

by charlie on May 6, 2013 4:51 pm • linkreport

But giving them CFLs is cheaper than giving them credits and also reduces energy use. The goal is not to save poor people money on their energy bill.

by David C on May 6, 2013 7:58 pm • linkreport

The rebate program encouraged me to seek out and purchase an energy star hot water heater- which cost quite a bit more than a non energy star water heater. It was VERY hard to find one in stock- which I hope is a sign that people in metro DC are installing energy efficient appliances. BTW, the rebate was $400 which didn't cover the entire cost difference, but that will be gained back over time with the energy saving appliance.

by Tom A. on May 6, 2013 10:52 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or