Greater Greater Washington

Bicycling


Ride shows the need to expand Montgomery's bike network

Capital Bikeshare could come to Montgomery County this year, along with an influx of new riders. It's time to look at how to improve the county's bike network. To do so, a group of 20 bicyclists took to the streets of Silver Spring and Takoma Park last Saturday on a 5-mile ride organized by myself and the Montgomery County Sierra Club.


Photo by the author.

Last summer, I began working with Ethan Goffman, bicycle and Smart Growth coordinator for the Sierra Club, on a Bicycle Statement outlining 6 principles that policymakers, community leaders, planners and transportation engineers should follow to make bicycling safer, more efficient and more enjoyable for everyone.

The statement echoes calls from other bike advocates to improve the county's cycling network, particularly in the Downcounty, where the 29 new bikeshare stations will be.

The six principles are:

Make a complete network: Bicycle lanes and paths should connect to each other and to major destinations like schools, transit stations and job centers, making them a reliable way to get around.

Be context-appropriate: A network with different kinds of bicycle facilities will best be able to fit into different neighborhoods.

Provide comfort: Bicyclists will be more likely to use the network if it provides multiple route options, is easy to navigate, and has conveniences like secure parking.

Safety: Bicyclists will feel safe on facilities that are well maintained, well-lit, and have "eyes on the street" to watch over them.

Engage the public: Making community members part of the bicycle planning process will build public support for bicycling while showing that bicyclists are valued and respected by the county.

Education: All road users, whether they are cyclists, pedestrians or drivers, should understand their rights and responsibilities and the rights and responsibilities of others.

Keeping those in mind, I designed a route that takes riders on different kinds of bicycle routes, ranging from a trail through a park to bike lanes to riding in mixed traffic.

We had a pretty diverse crowd with a wide mix of ages and skill levels, ranging from kids just out of training wheels to experienced bicyclists. Most riders came from inside-the-Beltway Silver Spring, though one person came from Takoma Park and another from Capitol Hill. The ride was pretty smooth, though there were a few spills and some emergency repairs.


Sharing the road with drivers and pedestrians in Silver Spring.

Along the way, we stopped to talk about each principle, along with things the county and local municipalities are doing well, like the extensive trail network in Sligo Creek Park. While none of the neighborhood streets have bike lanes, they're slow and quiet, making them a nice alternative to busy main roads when they're not closed to through traffic. In a few places, our group had its own cheering section of neighbors.

Riders pointed out places where the bike network needs improvement. Many off-street trails are poorly maintained, leading to ruts and standing water. The Metropolitan Branch Trail abruptly stops a half-mile short of the Silver Spring Metro station, held up by historical preservationists who don't want it passing by the historic, but empty B&O rail station.

On-street riding can be equally frustrating. We used the block-long Cedar Street bike lane in Silver Spring, which was once named "America's stupidest bike lane" before being redesigned by the Montgomery County Department of Transportation. Meanwhile, streets like Maple Avenue in Takoma Park are wide enough for bike lanes but were given sharrows instead, which means bicyclists have to share the road with drivers that are encouraged to speed because the street is so wide.


Riding past a construction site on Carroll Street in Takoma, DC.

Another issue was the need to educate everyone on how to share the road. On narrow Carroll Street NW in Takoma, drivers came too close to our group or sped into oncoming traffic to pass us, violating both DC's and Maryland's 3-foot passing laws. Meanwhile, on the Sligo Creek Park trail, a pair of joggers reminded us that we have to ride single-file so as not to block the whole path.

How can we improve the cycling environment? One recurring theme in our discussion was that the Department of Transportation made bike improvements based on their idea of what bicyclists want or need, like the Cedar Street bike lane, but were surprised when bicyclists actually didn't use them.

Casey Anderson, Planning Board member and Silver Spring resident, and Jack Cochrane of MoBike stressed the need to for bicyclists to let county officials know what they need. County officials need to listen to bicyclists, but they can only do so if bicyclists make themselves heard.

Overall, this was a great bike ride. I was blown away by the turnout and the enthusiasm of all our participants. It's been about 20 years since the Montgomery County Sierra Club last held a group bike ride, but this is definitely a tradition that they should resume. Ethan and I are already talking about when our bike ride will be.

Thanks to everyone who came! This wouldn't have been a success without you. And if you were unable to make it, check out this slideshow of our ride.

A planner and architect by training, Dan Reed also writes his own blog, Just Up the Pike, and serves as the Land Use Chair for the Action Committee for Transit. He lives in downtown Silver Spring. 

Comments

Add a comment »

I had always assumed that the completion of the MoCo MBT from the DC line to the SS transit center was held up because the county couldn't 'afford' to pay for it (which is ridiculous seeing how they waste millions on other projects). However, this revelation that the preservationists are the culprits isn't surprising at all.

The B&O station is an important historical structure (along with the rest of them along the MARC line), but there's no reason that it and the trail can't coexist.

by King Terrapin on Apr 22, 2013 11:47 am • linkreport

KT - The objection to the trail has nothing to do with the preservation of the building.

The preservation society offers free parking in the space between the building and the tracks to anyone who rents the old station for an event. They feel that loss of the parking lot to a trail will hurt them financially.

by Ben Ross on Apr 22, 2013 1:20 pm • linkreport

Correction - nothing to do directly.

The preservation society uses its revenue to maintain the building.

by Ben Ross on Apr 22, 2013 1:23 pm • linkreport

The county owns the fire station, right? Can't they work something out with regards to making some of that parking available?

Or the Fenton St Village garage? Is that owned by the county?

by MLD on Apr 22, 2013 1:28 pm • linkreport

@MLD

My thoughts exactly. There's a parking garage and a parking lot, both public, within 1000 feet of the old train station that visitors could use (while saving a couple of spaces on-site for the disabled and deliveries) but there really isn't anywhere else that the Metropolitan Branch Trail could go. It's unfortunate that MPI is holding this process up over what's basically a non-issue.

by dan reed! on Apr 22, 2013 1:36 pm • linkreport

It would be worthwhile to know how much revenue MPI receives from renting the space that is directed toward maintaining the building. It would also be worth comparing how many people now visit the museum vs. how many could visit it if it were a feature along the MetBranch Trail.
The parking lot usually sits mostly empty, including on weekends when you would expect visitors. It is a little used resource. The MPI mission to reach out to the public is being undercut by their very misguided opposition to having the Trail at their museum.

by Wayne Phyillaier on Apr 22, 2013 2:35 pm • linkreport

Making the MBT go past the old station should be a win-win. I have often thought that its a shame that the old station is so undersused. But it sits alone. Making it a destination on the MBT could help the station: perhaps it could be a little cafe on the way. You see that reuse on a lot of rail to trail networks.

by SJE on Apr 22, 2013 3:07 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or

Support Us