Greater Greater Washington

Preservation


DDOT website first to get landmark status

This article was posted as an April Fool's joke.

DC's Historic Website Review Board designated the DDOT site as the first DC entry into the National Register of Historic Websites yesterday. The landmarking will ensure that the site retains its characteristic look and feel and distinctive organization.


DDOT's historic website appearance.

"DDOT's site is a classic example of the hiararchicalist style of Web site organization, where each page represents a different administrative subunit of a government entity," said GWU Professor of Digital Studies Richard Shortstreth. "Constructed as DC was transitioning from the Barry era to a more technocratic management under Mayor Williams, this site represents a key period in DC's history."

The site's bright red links and long lists of PDFs are some of the distinguishing features separating the site from more contemporary creations. Shortstreth added, "The DDOT site incorporates some highly ornamental URLs typical of content management systems of that historic period. Whereas a more modern sites might use a simple URL like http://www.ddot.dc.gov/director/about.html for the Director's page, the DDOT page adds complex detailing by locating the page at http://ddot.dc.gov/ddot/cwp/view,a,1251,q,573009,ddotNav_GID,1609,ddotNav,|32404|.asp."

Under the recently amended DC preservation law, websites constructed before 2004 can be preserved if they meet one of several criteria including "work of a master," "displayed information about historic events," or "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a coding style, period, or method of layout." The law was passed amid outrage stemming from Metro's recent Web redesign that added modern detailing, such as gradients on the menu bar and large colorful icons, creating an incongruity between Metro's Brutalist architecture and the appearance of the site.

HWRB will review any new sections or features to ensure that they remain "compatible" with the earlier design, including presenting the user with a similar ease of finding information as on the current site. Minor changes can be handled at the staff level, according to State Website Preservation Officer David Baloney.

The Committee of 1100100 also announced plans to conduct a historic survey of blogs using the classic Blogger templates for creation of a potential historic district.

Tip: Michael Perkins.end_

David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington and Greater Greater Education. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater. 

Comments

Add a comment »

"The Committee of 1100100..." lol.

by Alex B. on Apr 1, 2009 11:00 am • linkreport

Watch out, I understand a register of historic satire is coming soon.

by Steve on Apr 1, 2009 11:03 am • linkreport

oh, this is good.... :)

by IMGoph on Apr 1, 2009 11:11 am • linkreport

Okay, this made me laugh inappropriately in the workplace.

by цarьchitect on Apr 1, 2009 11:31 am • linkreport

Why nothing about the historic integrity of the construction methods? What's coded in cobol should stay in cobol...

by Ben Ross on Apr 1, 2009 11:37 am • linkreport

Did Dr. Longstreth really say that long URL in an interview, or are you just pulling my chain?

by Michael Perkins on Apr 1, 2009 12:08 pm • linkreport

Did Dr. Shortstreth really say that long URL in an interview, or are you just pulling my chain?

Whoops! Forgot to use the fake name.

by Michael Perkins on Apr 1, 2009 12:09 pm • linkreport

Not bad...

Those red links are worth preserving! Its like 1997 every time I hit their site.

by staypuftman on Apr 1, 2009 12:35 pm • linkreport

I understand that the landmark application was filed in 1987 to short circuit a redesign by the Barry Administration, but that parties agreed to put the designation on hold, thus forcing DDOT into the severely outdated design it enjoys today. The nomination resurfaced after Mayor Crackberry mandated a new design for the site, thus prompting the showdown with the HWRB.

I understand that if the HWRB accepts the nomination, parties from ICANN and Netowrk Solutions may step in to force a legal resolution at the Surpreme Court level. In the meantime residents of the District will suffer with a website which is woefully outdated at the hands of the webservationsits.

by William on Apr 1, 2009 12:36 pm • linkreport

Very funny (and too true!)...

by Michael on Apr 1, 2009 12:59 pm • linkreport

My ANC got no advance notice of this designation as is required by DC Code Sec. 1-309. I am already fielding calls from irate webmonkeys worried that HWRB will come after them if they, for instance, uninstall IE4 or Netscape 4.7.

by Jonathan Bender on Apr 1, 2009 1:04 pm • linkreport

Those are cutting edge. I am still working off Mosaic from the University of Illinois.

by William on Apr 1, 2009 1:25 pm • linkreport

GGW is full of win today.

by Gavin Baker on Apr 1, 2009 1:47 pm • linkreport

funny, but perhaps unfair to dig on DDOT alone...

see for instance:

http://os.dc.gov/os/site/default.asp?osNav=|

http://cfo.dc.gov/cfo/site/default.asp?cfoNav=|33206|

http://opgd.dc.gov/opgd/site/default.asp?opgdNav_GID=1652

by some dude on Apr 1, 2009 3:35 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or