Preservation
DDOT website first to get landmark status
This article was posted as an April Fool's joke.DC's Historic Website Review Board designated the DDOT site as the first DC entry into the National Register of Historic Websites yesterday. The landmarking will ensure that the site retains its characteristic look and feel and distinctive organization.
"DDOT's site is a classic example of the hiararchicalist style of Web site organization, where each page represents a different administrative subunit of a government entity," said GWU Professor of Digital Studies Richard Shortstreth. "Constructed as DC was transitioning from the Barry era to a more technocratic management under Mayor Williams, this site represents a key period in DC's history."
The site's bright red links and long lists of PDFs are some of the distinguishing features separating the site from more contemporary creations. Shortstreth added, "The DDOT site incorporates some highly ornamental URLs typical of content management systems of that historic period. Whereas a more modern sites might use a simple URL like http://www.ddot.dc.gov/director/about.html for the Director's page, the DDOT page adds complex detailing by locating the page at http://ddot.dc.gov/ddot/cwp/view,a,1251,q,573009,ddotNav_GID,1609,ddotNav,|32404|.asp."
Under the recently amended DC preservation law, websites constructed before 2004 can be preserved if they meet one of several criteria including "work of a master," "displayed information about historic events," or "embodies the distinctive characteristics of a coding style, period, or method of layout." The law was passed amid outrage stemming from Metro's recent Web redesign that added modern detailing, such as gradients on the menu bar and large colorful icons, creating an incongruity between Metro's Brutalist architecture and the appearance of the site.
HWRB will review any new sections or features to ensure that they remain "compatible" with the earlier design, including presenting the user with a similar ease of finding information as on the current site. Minor changes can be handled at the staff level, according to State Website Preservation Officer David Baloney.
The Committee of 1100100 also announced plans to conduct a historic survey of blogs using the classic Blogger templates for creation of a potential historic district.
Comments
- Latest Metro map drafts add Anacostia parks and other tweaks
- Bikeshare is a gateway to private biking, not competition
- DC Council makes major policy changes overnight
- Short-term Washingtonians deserve a voice, too
- Public land deals have both benefits and pitfalls
- Parklets give every block a little park
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools







by Alex B. on Apr 1, 2009 11:00 am • link • report
by Steve on Apr 1, 2009 11:03 am • link • report
by IMGoph on Apr 1, 2009 11:11 am • link • report
by цarьchitect on Apr 1, 2009 11:31 am • link • report
by Ben Ross on Apr 1, 2009 11:37 am • link • report
by Michael Perkins on Apr 1, 2009 12:08 pm • link • report
Whoops! Forgot to use the fake name.
by Michael Perkins on Apr 1, 2009 12:09 pm • link • report
Those red links are worth preserving! Its like 1997 every time I hit their site.
by staypuftman on Apr 1, 2009 12:35 pm • link • report
I understand that if the HWRB accepts the nomination, parties from ICANN and Netowrk Solutions may step in to force a legal resolution at the Surpreme Court level. In the meantime residents of the District will suffer with a website which is woefully outdated at the hands of the webservationsits.
by William on Apr 1, 2009 12:36 pm • link • report
by Michael on Apr 1, 2009 12:59 pm • link • report
by Jonathan Bender on Apr 1, 2009 1:04 pm • link • report
by William on Apr 1, 2009 1:25 pm • link • report
by Gavin Baker on Apr 1, 2009 1:47 pm • link • report
see for instance:
http://os.dc.gov/os/site/default.asp?osNav=|
http://cfo.dc.gov/cfo/site/default.asp?cfoNav=|33206|
http://opgd.dc.gov/opgd/site/default.asp?opgdNav_GID=1652
by some dude on Apr 1, 2009 3:35 pm • link • report
Add a Comment