Greater Greater Washington

Development


The Wheaton library should be in downtown Wheaton

The draft for the new Wheaton Sector Plan currently includes provisions to build a new library in downtown Wheaton. The new library would replace the current Wheaton library which, oddly, is not in downtown Wheaton.


Current Wheaton library. Photo by Montgomery County Pub. Libraries, MD.

Rather, it is north of downtown Wheaton, on the corner of Arcola Avenue and Georgia Avenue. Though the current library is a fifteen minute walk north of the Wheaton Metro, its pedestrian-hostile configuration and pedestrian-hostile place discourage walking.

Moving the library to a more transit-rich, centrally located site in downtown Wheaton would both improve the accessibility of the library and the social and economic vitality of the existing walkable urban downtown. The other walkable urban downtowns in Montgomery County such as Bethesda, Silver Spring, Rockville, and Takoma Park have libraries at their walkable centers.

Nevertheless, a number of "don't move the library" signs have started appearing in Wheaton. Why would they want to save it?

The current Wheaton library is very suburban and hostile to pedestrians. It's not in downtown Wheaton. It's past where the walkable urban town ends and becomes car-dependent suburbia. The cars travel faster on Georgia Avenue there than in Wheaton proper. It's really hard to cross Georgia Avenue at Arcola Avenue.

The main entrance opens up to the parking lot, which is behind the building, away from the sidewalk. The secondary entrance does not open up to the narrow sidewalk on Georgia Avenue. Rather, it is behind some bushes and a drop-off and pick-up driveway for cars. It was constructed in 1962, remodeled in 1985, and designed to be by the car, of the car, and for the car, like most buildings built during those time periods.

The "Save Wheaton Library" website says:

The Library as currently situated is easily, safely, and pleasantly accessible by foot and public transportation to thousands of residents in its surrounding neighborhoods.
However, before making this assertion, it points out another feature of the current library:
Parking at the Wheaton Library's present site is ample, free, and there are no complications about misuse (as is the case in other CBDs).
This argument reveals why the authors of this website like the current library. It has ample, free parking. Lots of it. Too much of it. So much that it makes it hostile to pedestrians, like many other car-dependent places. (Plus, the current library is not actually in the CBD.)

Just like most other anti-campaigns, this one is merely about preserving the status quo. Somehow, I doubt that the small handful of my neighbors with signs on their front lawns have ever walked to the library. I live on the northern side of downtown Wheaton, really close to the library. I don't ever use it because I hate walking there. In fact, I've only used it in the past six months to pick up tax forms. That's because it's so much safer and more interesting to walk in a town environment with where I can run multiple errands, the blocks are short, and the cars drive at 25 miles per hour.

In order for Wheaton to live up to its potential as a vibrant economic and cultural center, it needs a mix of uses. Its current zoning allows single story, single-use retail, without parking minimums. Earlier this decade, new townhouses were built on the periphery of the downtown. More recently, new apartments opened up on top of the Metro. But downtown Wheaton still lacks a center of public life. A library would create that activity center, increasing foot traffic, the customer base for the small businesses in the downtown, and safety by putting more eyes on the street.

The opponents also list safety as one of their reasons to oppose a downtown library:

Security [would be a perceived] big issue. Many felt they would not feel comfortable leaving their children at the downtown location. Many feel the open parking lot at the present library is safer than a covered structure that would be downtown (especially for women). Also, school buses use the present library to drop children off from school. Many parents expressed concern about dropping their children off at a downtown library.
A downtown library would improve safety in its area, not reduce it. Yet this argument seems to stem from a classic suburban perception of safety: walkable is unsafe while car-dependent is safe. The truth is, of course, far more nuanced. In our region, there are a whole range of crime rates in both walkable urban and car-dependent places. You can't simply tie a land-use arrangement to a 50-year-old perception of safety.

Wheaton is very fortunate to have a Metro station directly underneath it. With great privilege comes great responsibility. An important civic place like a library should be situated in a place where the community can use and celebrate it as much as possible. When the very location of the public structure will also breathe more vitality into an already functioning walkable urban place, it is the responsibility of the community to embrace change for the common good. It is silly that the current Wheaton library serves a certain constituency, motorists, at the expense of everyone else. A library located in downtown Wheaton, rather than in its car-dependent fringes, would better serve all constituencies, including motorists.

Cavan Wilk became interested in the physical layout and economic systems of modern human settlements while working on his Master's in Financial Economics. His writing often focuses on the interactions between a place's form, its economic systems, and the experiences of those who live in them. He lives in downtown Silver Spring. 

Comments

Add a comment »

It is impossible to argue that the current location is more accessible than a downtown location. The downtown Wheaton area is much more densely populated and a library in this area would increase access for the community. Additionally, being so close to a metro could potentially pull in people that live near the close metro stops of Glenmont and Forest Glen.

Look, to the opponents credit, I suppose if I lived a block or two from the library, I might fight for the status quo. But that ignores the greater good of the larger Wheaton community; Ultimately the greater good is what the city's planners should be looking at instead of the interests of just a few in and around the Arcola corridor.

I get really uncomfortable with the "security" issue. The security issue raises the thinly veiled coded language that has been used to instill fear in countless other communities. But fear of what, do you ask? If you know the Wheaton area then I think I could venture to guess. Could it be that a downtown location would increase access to the larger minority community thus tipping the demographic makeup of the beneficiaries that use the library? This argument for not moving the library, REALLY, REALLY, leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

by Piero on Apr 20, 2009 10:50 am • linkreport

Piero, you raise an excellent point about "security." I've had a lot of people say to me "don't you know how DANGEROUS downtown Wheaton is?!?!" after I tell them where I live. I tell them that it isn't. I walk there every day, as do my male and female roommates. I don't really get why anyone would say something that is not very accurate.

I can't speak for the authors of the anti-website but it did occur to me that "security" might be a proxy argument for something else. In fairness to them, I can't say that for sure. For the post, I can only take the text on the website at face value.

by Cavan on Apr 20, 2009 11:47 am • linkreport

A downtown library would improve safety in its area, not reduce it.

cavan - that doesn't mean that the relative safety of the library itself wouldn't be reduced in comparison to its current location. both arguments are spurious.

that said, someone should spend a few days tallying the number of library visits made by people in cars vs. on foot/public transportation, to see if that argument holds any water. or at the very least, do a little video of how "pleasant" it is to access by foot from the metro station, and by public transportation in general.

by AJ on Apr 20, 2009 11:55 am • linkreport

"Security" is a magic word (as is "liability") by which the utterer hopes to cast a spell over the listener. If the spell is successful, the listener's brain shuts off and s/he stops thinking.

by thm on Apr 20, 2009 12:38 pm • linkreport

AJ, I don't have to sit there in the parking lot to tell you that the current library is primarily used by motorists. It is not easy or convenient to walk to. The houses behind it are separated by a fence and a parking lot. Those residents would have to walk around the fence rather than straight to the library. The houses across the street are across a large suburban arterial with cars traveling at least 40 miles per hour.

thm, that's a really good point about language and its use/misuse.

by Cavan on Apr 20, 2009 1:21 pm • linkreport

cavan - you've got anecdotes. not data. i'm not saying the data aren't there, but you're not showing any.

by AJ on Apr 20, 2009 1:30 pm • linkreport

Given the need for budget cuts and the much more deplorable condition of the libraries in downtown silver spring, white oak, and apsen hill, I think it is extremely poor policy to be debating moving the Wheaton library anywhere. It's a very new building, probably less than a mile north of downtown Wheaton, and accessible by public transport. People wanting to bring more life to Wheaton should look to something else rather than a public service outlet.

by Mike on Apr 20, 2009 5:46 pm • linkreport

I used to walk to Wheaton Regional from the Metro when I was in high school, back when Good Counsel was still down there on Georgia. The Good Counsel kids would honk their horns and laugh at any pedestrians who happened to pass by. Given that and the 50 mph traffic to one's left, it was not an inviting pedestrian environment. I, too, cannot imagine that anything but a gigantic majority of users of WRL are motorists.

by Lindemann on Apr 20, 2009 9:13 pm • linkreport

nice post.

All communities should have transportation demand management requirements for siting decisions for capital expenditures using public monies.

The argument about doing surveys of how people get there begs the question. The library is located in a zone of automobility and the density of housing is such that limited numbers of people in the immediate area are likely to be served through walking-bicycling-transit.

The issue though here, is that you are asking that MoCo change its orientation from automobility and suburbanity to walking-bicycling-transit and a different mobility and land use paradigm.

This is in keeping with the new paradigm that MoCo is working to develop. (I haven't had a chance to get to one of the meetings yet where Royce Hanson talks about this...

http://www.montgomeryplanning.org/research/growth_policy/growth_policy09/agp_growing_smarter.shtm

But it does involve real tradeoffs and losses for certain favored constituencies who benefit from the current paradigm.

by Richard Layman on Apr 22, 2009 1:13 pm • linkreport

The library will continue to be used by those who drive to it wherever it is located. As much as we want us to become a mass transit culture, we will not be there for some time. Locating it in downtown Wheaton will not necessarily be more convenient for automobile users as they will have to find parking in parking garages etc. There is no inherent reason why a library should not be in a residential setting. The greatest reason to leave it in its current location is economics. County money is tight and it is prudent to assume it will remain so for some time. Find other draws for downtown Wheaton that do not require replacing a perfectly serviceable and heavily used facility. There is a phrase 'follow the money'. Who gains economically from moving the library - who gets to buy the current site, build the new site? The current site is a cultural center as is, it does not need to be moved to fulfill those goals.

by DSS on Sep 8, 2009 10:00 am • linkreport

NO WL SHOULDNT be in dwtwn Wheaton, and thankfully it wont be!

Stop trying to say Wheaton wont be revitalised unless the library is there!

What needs to be done is gut the wheaton triangle strip( dnkin donuts, aquarium philipino store, locksmith, mechanic shop, cash depot, etc), & build the town square there.

by lilkunta on Jun 20, 2010 12:44 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or