Greater Greater Washington

Transit


All BRT plans are not created equal

Montgomery County Councilmember Marc Elrich believes that his proposed Bus Rapid Transit network is a key tool to deal with the huge amounts of traffic that the controversial Base Realignment and Closure plan (BRAC) will bring to military facilities in the county. Elrich cited two of his proposed BRT lines, from Olney and Germantown to downtown Bethesda, as key links from housing to BRAC jobs.


Photo by Los Angeles Metro.

Councilmember Elrich clearly sees Bus Rapid Transit as a piece of our region's future mobility infrastructure plans. Back in December, he articulated a plan that would implement BRT in selected Montgomery County corridors. While BRT has its own unique strengths and weaknesses and should never be used as a direct substitute for heavy rail, light rail, or streetcars, it can be a complimentary piece of the regional transportation system.

On a positive note, Elrich seems to understand that BRT is not BRT without its own dedicated right of way:

Elrich said although he had not had detailed discussions with Navy Med about the project, he thought the necessary 20 feet of right-of-way could be obtained along the east-side curb along Route 355 at Navy Med. ... The BRT lines would feature dedicated lanes in the median or curbside, real-time travel information for customers, and flexible routes, with six to eight minutes between stops at each station.
The biggest danger is for political pressure to convert the BRT late into first an HOV lane, then just another general traffic lane. Any asphalt is inherently attractive to cars' unquenchable desire for more asphalt. Motorists, often through civic associations, will call their Councilmembers and lobby for any dedicated bus lane to be opened up for all vehicles. This would then negate the entire point of BRT. The lines would become as slow as the Q2 or the 30s lines because of the car traffic.

This happened with the Shirley Busway, in the median of I-395 in Virginia. The Shirley Busway began as a bus-only lane. Then it became a bus and HOV lane. Next, hybrid vehicles could use it too. Now, the lane is becoming a HOT lane. Our region is not the only one that has devolved dedicated bus lanes. The New York State DOT just coverted bus lanes to bus-and-HOV, slowing buses, on the Tappan Zee Bridge north of New York City (via The Overhead Wire).

Elrich is also touting "flexible routes" as a positive feature. However, flexibility is also a drawback of BRT and such a "feature" could doom a BRT system to failure. Developers hesitate to invest in transit-oriented, human-scale street grid development near BRT stations because of the possibility of a route change in the middle of the night. Transit is most convenient, efficient, and cost-effective when it connects and/or operates completely within walkable urban human-scale street gridded places.

Convenient, efficient transit cannot coexist with a low-density car-dependent environment except as commuter rail or commuter bus. And those commuter services still need dense job centers at one end of their routes. No bus or train can go to every little subdivision and strip mall and be convenient enough to attract riders who also own automobiles.

Asked by The Gazette if the Olney and Germantown lines specifically would help move large numbers of BRAC employees, Elrich indicated that generally speaking the system accounted for connecting population centers with employment centers, and that these routes could move more new BRAC employees than the proposed Purple Line light rail project between New Carrollton and Bethesda. BRAC is expected to bring in about 2,500 new jobs to Bethesda.
Mr. Elrich doesn't seem to understand the connection between transportation and land use. His environmentally-friendly vision of creating a BRT should be applauded. However, he is trying to do the impossible: build a mass transit system that is convenient for all residents of the miles and miles of car-dependent un-places in Montgomery County. He is trying to envision a system that improves upon the status quo, rather than acknowledging that the land use status quo is the problem. The fundamental characterics of a low-density car-dependent land use arrangement is inherently prohibitive to transit that is convenient enough to attract riders of choice from their cars. When he talks about his BRT vision, he acknowledges that traffic is a problem and touts his vision as a tool to address it. However, just like every other car-dependent place, the traffic is a symptom of an arrangement that requires its residents to drive for every basic life function. Building a BRT system won't change that. However, enacting policies that provide incentives for human-scale street grid development around transit hubs will. However, the problems associated with lack of development around bus stations would rear their head in such a scenario.
Councilwoman Nancy Floreen, however, noted that the general idea for BRT is not new, and that the Washington Metro Area Transit Authority was already looking into similar ideas. She also mentioned cost figures and ridership numbers as potential problems. Floreen is chairwoman of the county's Transportation, Infrastructure, Energy and Environment Committee.
While transit advocates often disagree with Councilmember Floreen about transportation issues, she has a valid point in this case. Despite the fact that the separate jurisdictions in our region have their own county and city councils, we have all prospered together with regional transit cooperation. The Metro has been an unquestionable success in our region for a variety of reasons, one of which being the improved access to jobs and amenities across jurisdictions. Because of our positive experience with regional transportation, it would be a better idea to plan a complementary BRT system on a regional scale , while focusing development on heavy rail Red Line stations and on future light rail Purple Line Stations.
Cavan Wilk became interested in the physical layout and economic systems of modern human settlements while working on his Master's in Financial Economics. His writing often focuses on the interactions between a place's form, its economic systems, and the experiences of those who live in them. He lives in downtown Silver Spring. 

Comments

Add a comment »

Anything that gets rid of those stupid mile-long patches of mowable lawns in the middle road medians is okay with me. First get rid of the medians, then you bring the BRT, and eventually you replace them with light rail/streetcars.

Many of the major transit corridors began as streetcar lines, only to be taken over by cars. It's about time the streetcars took over the roads.

by monkeyrotica on Apr 30, 2009 11:40 am • linkreport

monkeyrotica,

Huzzah! It would be wonderful to see that in the future, hot likely it is to happen, I don't know; but regardless it is something to think about.

I was wondering if you had some ideas as to which corridors you would like to see develop as such?

by Art on Apr 30, 2009 11:54 am • linkreport

Except, monkeyrotica, that medians are good for pedestrians crossing wide streets and make easy conversion to boarding areas.

Maybe they just need trees to be less useful, although AAA does oppose trees along roadways.

by цarьchitect on Apr 30, 2009 2:10 pm • linkreport

@Art - I'd start with Route 1. Anywhere between Laurel MD and Quantico VA. Start with the densest corridors first, then expand until they all connect. The Wisconsin Avenue/Rockville Pike corridor needs this as well. Lee Highway, Glebe Road, almost all had some sort of streetcar line at some point. These are fairly dense commercial/residential routes, with lots of potential passengers. It's always been like that. There's been heavy traffic on these corridors for a hundred years, and there will be heavy traffic on them for a hundred more. The sooner rail infrastructure is laid down, the more you save in the long run. The longer you put it off, the more expensive it gets.

Whatever happend with the BRT Crystal City/Braddock Road connector? All that's kinda fallen by the wayside with the Potomac Yards Metro cheerleading.

by monkeyrotica on Apr 30, 2009 2:48 pm • linkreport

Route 1 is a great corridor. Viers Mill Road and Georgia Ave also. I'm a fan of Route 29/New Hampshire Ave.

I think we need to look at southern Prince George's also. There's at least two possible corridors--both have pluses and minuses.

1. Marlboro Pike/Benning or Marlboro Pike/Alabama Ave/Pennsylvania Ave to Potomac Park. This corridor has sufficient existing transit users, density and aging commercial development. There is sufficient right of way on some, although not all of the route.

2. Central Ave/East Capital/Union Station. Good right of way most of the route. Density, existing transit users and commericial space limited.

by kreeggo on Apr 30, 2009 3:54 pm • linkreport

kreego, did you mean to imply Rte 29 and New Hampshire Ave. are the same road? NHA is Rte 650 and has a JNX w/ 29.

by Bianchi on Apr 30, 2009 4:15 pm • linkreport

Elrich said that three lines - the ones to Olney and Germantown, and the line to Burtonsville along Route 29 - are his top priorities. I don't see why the 29 line wouldn't be any less useful for BRAC.

His BRT proposal would put the line straight down Route 29 from Burtonsville to Silver Spring, while another line would follow New Hampshire Avenue. This is separate from the "Purple Line Spur" that the County Council proposed, which would be along New Hampshire between Langley Park and White Oak.

by dan reed on Apr 30, 2009 4:54 pm • linkreport

What about dedicated bike lanes on 355? I've talked to numerous co-workers on the Naval Base, who could ride to work, but choose not to because they're worried about being run over by cars. The base also needs dedicated gates with bike lanes. Almost every cyclist on base I've spoken to wants them.

by Huck Finne on Apr 30, 2009 5:12 pm • linkreport

To Bianchi: No--Meant to convey a route that began on U.S. 29 that turned down New Hampshire toward Ft. Totten. This routing has several advantages and a couple disadvantages over proceeding stratight down 29

Positives:

1. This routing avoids the problems inside the Beltway on U.S. 29

2. This routing has an existing transit base (Rt 29 commuters and a more transit dependent population from White Oak to Ft. Totten. It has sufficient density along the New Hampshire portion of the route to support transit without building large parking garages.

3. This route has a number of older shopping areas that would be boosted by BRT type service (Briggs Chaney, White Oak, Hillandale, Langley Park, E/W Hwy, Eastern Ave)

4. It would connect to Purple Line at Langley Park & Green/Yellow/Red Line at Ft. Totten without further transfer.

5. It would provide direct transit service to FDA

6. It has good right of way on Rt. 29 and generally good right of way on New Hampshire.

Negatives:

1. Commuters/travelers to Bethesda/NIH, Naval Medical would have a longer connection to Purple Line instead of routing straight down U.S. 29 to Silver Spring.

2. Right of way after Eastern Ave in the District is constricted.

Hope this clarifies.

by kreeggo on Apr 30, 2009 10:14 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or

Support Us