Greater Greater Washington

Montgomery voters strongly support Bus Rapid Transit

A new poll finds that a large majority of Montgomery County voters support more transit, including a proposed Bus Rapid Transit network. It may seem surprising, but it reflects overall trends favoring better transit.


Montgomery BRT supporters at a hearing. Photo by Aimee Custis.

In January, the Coalition for Smarter Growth commissioned polling firm Mason-Dixon to survey voters' attitudes towards the 81-mile, 10-line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) proposal, which the county approved last November and is now studying specific corridors. In a historically suburban county that is urbanizing quickly, debates over better transit have been contentious, and we wanted to understand where people really stood.

Out of 400 Montgomery County voters that Mason-Dixon surveyed by phone, 71% support the BRT plan and 22% oppose it after hearing common arguments from naysayers and supporters alike. Support is fairly uniform across age groups and race, though is much higher amongst Democrats (76%) than Republicans (57%), and amongst women (77%).

Voters agree that BRT could reduce traffic, but unsure about taking lanes from cars

While contentious arguments over transit projects often dominate the public debate, the reality is that a solid majority favors it. But they're not always present at public hearings or community meetings, perhaps in part because few people are aware of Mont­gom­ery's BRT plans to begin with: just 31% knew about the plan at the time of the poll.

Poll respondents were read a series of statements that reflect the main arguments for and against building a BRT system. 80% of voters agreed with statements that BRT was the most affordable option compared to other modes of transit. They also strongly agreed that BRT could reduce traffic by moving more commuters through congested corridors (76%), and that BRT supports the right kind of development by supporting walkable communities (78%).

Meanwhile, respondents disagreed with nearly all of the negative arguments about BRT. Just 26% agreed with the statement that BRT will "ruin the character" of existing neighborhoods, as some opponents say. But voters were split over whether repurposing general traffic lanes for buses would make automobile traffic worse, with 50% believing they would.

That may seem intuitive, but dozens of examples from around the country and around the world show that repurposing street space for transit and other modes typically has no impact on traffic as commuters shift modes or alter their routes. It may take a pilot or new local examples like Alexandria's BRT, which will open this summer and include repurposed lanes, for people to see for themselves how BRT can work.

Regional and national trends favor transit

A solid majority of Montgomery residents believe that transit investments, not new highways, are the right way to move forward, with 63% of voters agreeing. Washington Post polling data suggests public opinion in the region has been shifting on this question over the past few decades. In 1998, 51% of respondents to their survey supported investing in transit over roads, but in 2010 and 2013, approximately 60% did.

Those opinions are in line with a national survey of attitudes about transit RCLCO conducted in 2011. It found that 50% of Americans said better transit would improve traffic, and that a majority of people want to live in walkable, transit-served communities.

So are government investments reflecting the public's growing interest in transit? While Montgomery’s latest transportation priority letter represents a major shift in the right direction, there are still many expensive road widenings and interchanges on the books in Montgomery and around the region.

With public opinion shifting, people driving less, and climate change on the rise, the time is now to shift our spending priorities to transit and other sustainable travel options.

Kelly Blynn is the Coalition for Smarter Growth's Next Generation of Transit Campaign Manager and a member of the pedestrian advocacy organization All Walks DC. She is a former international campaigner at the climate change group 350.org and is now passionate about organizing locally with communities for sustainable and equitable transportation in the Washington region. 

Comments

Add a comment »

You call out "Alexandria's BRT" line, while linking to an article titled "Arlington starts work on the region's first BRT line".

Might be best to say "the Arlington-Alexandria BRT" since it involves participation from both jurisdictions.

by Chase on Mar 10, 2014 2:03 pm • linkreport

I believe its officially called the Crystal City Potomac Yard Transitway

by AWalkerInTheCity on Mar 10, 2014 2:12 pm • linkreport

In Montgomery County, BRT proposals when pursued involve around 6 million dollars each route doing local surveys. If that continues, that'll come to over 60 million dollars wasted on weak studies that don't even search over the environmental and traffic impact of BRT.
BRT is 35 million dollars per mile, not including the 6 million here and there for the studies and stuff, not including the expense it'll involve yearly or anything. One route comes to nearly 60K per projected passenger where there's repurposed&"dedicated" lanes, etc., while meaning fewer stops, fewer routes of RideOn and MetroBus since their services would be cut to promote the BRT, worse road traffic and endless road construction.
Epic boondoggle, so I'm asking - who is looking at profiting? Am I supposed to trust somebody because they work for a "non-profit" when they appear to me to be an outside-funded committee ("for smart-growth") handsomely paid to tell everyone they know what people living nearby what they want, and really willing to mock critics who will be actually affected and railroad over their voiced concerns. They aren't paying the taxes for it all, and they aren't going to live with the damage next to them.
I'm not against BRT additions on highways that can handle them, but you don't make good transit by deciding something worked in Bogota or wherever so it'll be great in Wheaton.

by asffa on Mar 11, 2014 1:01 am • linkreport

asffa, exactly and to further add on. The so called planners supporting it are doing so in an agenda to waste money in hopes to drain out funding for building and widening highways in Montgomery County further having negative effects on population growth.

by tom on Mar 11, 2014 1:09 pm • linkreport

Tom I Agree that's part of what this is about. The BRT push, especially around Wheaton, for example does come at the same time that for example, the more affluent Gaithersburg area was going to be having roads planned long ago finally worked on/grounds broken. Since the same people oppose these builds (far as I can tell, all 9+ building designs), I think they've tipped their hand and made the wasting of funding to prevent new building part of their hidden intentions obvious.

by asffa on Mar 11, 2014 10:03 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or