Greater Greater Washington

How politics sank a radical monument 105 years ago

The simple Commodore Barry monument in Franklin Square gets lost among the many dead generals of Washington. The original design was very different, but was scuttled amid battles over how much a memorial in Washington, and immigrants in American society, should maintain a clear identity or assimilate into the conventional.


A plaster model of Andrew O'Connor's winning design.

In 1906, an alliance of Irish-American groups decided they wanted a monument that would assert their participation in the founding myth of the United States. This had been denied; before 1700, the principal means of Irish immigration was through indentured servitude. The Irish, upwardly mobile and increasingly tired of their second-class ethnic status, were arguably making a bid to become fully a part of white culture.

The Ancient Order of Hibernians, a friendly society, saw the Revolutionary War naval hero John Barry as precisely the man to plug into the American foundation myth. The French had done it with Rochambeau and Lafayette. The Poles would do the same with Kościuszko, and the Germans with von Steuben.

The Hibernians wanted the best, so they courted the judgement of stars like Daniel Burnham, Frank Millet, and Herbert Adams. They had no idea what they were getting.


Andrew O'Connor in Paris.

The jury's eyes smiled upon an Irish-American devotee of Rodin, Andrew O'Connor. From Paris, he contrasted a naturalistic portrait of Barry with impressionistic depictions of Irish history. A freestanding personification of Ireland blends into a low relief depicting Irish history. After St. Patrick, the frieze turns quickly toward English oppression, until it terminates in tormented nudes looking west across the ocean to a new life. (R-L)

Situating Barry in a narrative of British violence was wildly unconventional, but completely accurate. Protestant landowners expropriated the Barry family farm when John was a child, casting him into even more abject poverty. He was at sea by 14.

The statue of Barry is tough, if not butch. He's leaning into the deck of a rocking of a ship, staring at a threat unseen. O'Connor exaggerated his hands and face to realize a psychological intensity that is present in only a few monumental sculptures in DC, Henry Schrady's Grant, and the Adams Memorial.


Left: Detail of the Emigrants. Right: Detail of the John Barry portrait.

As far as I know, only the Eisenhower Memorial combines freestanding portraiture in front of bas-relief sculptures in a way that comes close to O'Connor's layering. The flickering of a radical direction for traditional sculpture appealed to artists steeped in psychology and modern philosophy but made enemies of Washington elites and populist conservatives.

The Hibernians balked at what they saw as a reification of hot-tempered Papist carnality. It's an altar behind a rail, for God's sake! And all that affliction was just so terribly 1545. It wasn't hard for the groups to push the stereotype further and see the statue of Barry as little more than a Bowery thug in Colonial duds. And those eagles...

The Hibernians wanted a statue that would include one of their own into the genteel pedigree of the memorial landscape. Looking around, that seemed to be mostly men in Classical repose with bald assertions of greatness. All this emphasis on misfortune and victimization was effete nonsense.

Controversy over the design went on for three years. A number of Beaux-arts sculptors and architects spoke out in favor of the design. In the end, the Hibernians reminded President Taft of their voting power, and he rejected the design on June 1st, 1909. The replacement is a competent statue by John Boyle, with an aristocratic commodore and a vacant female allegorical figure.

Like so many competitions, the winner judged by peers was brushed aside by the actual power behind it. After having a contest to make it look open and democratic, they put up whatever they actually wanted.

As one might expect, the appeal to respectability didn't work. At the dedication in 1914, Woodrow Wilson sniped at "Americans with hyphens" who wanted respect without shedding their identities.

Franklin Square, which seemed so promising at the time, never became a memorial ground like Lafayette Park. It never worked as a city park, either. Attention shifted elsewhere, leaving Barry adrift and alone.


John Boyle's completed Commodore Barry Memorial after completion.

Images: O'Connor design from Kirk Savage and the National Archives. Boyle design from the Commission on Fine Arts. A version of this post appeared on цarьchitect.

Support us: Monthly   Yearly   One time
Greatest supporter—$250/year
Greater supporter—$100/year
Great supporter—$50/year
Or pick your own amount: $/year
Greatest supporter—$250
Greater supporter—$100
Great supporter—$50
Supporter—$20
Or pick your own amount: $
Want to contribute by mail or another way? Instructions are here.
Contributions to Greater Greater Washington are not tax deductible.

Neil Flanagan grew up in Ward 3 before graduating from the Yale School of Architecture. He is pursuing an architecture license. He writes on architecture and Russia at цarьchitect

Comments

Add a comment »

The Ancient Order of Hibernians, a friendly society, saw the Revolutionary War naval hero John Barry as precisely the man to plug into the American foundation myth. The French had done it with Rochambeau and Lafayette.

I am not sure the French installed Lafayette into the American foundation myth. Lafayette was there in the actual foundation and played a moderately important role. James Monroe helped deify him by inviting him to tour the US in 1824. Monroe did have some french ancestry and served as ambassador to France, but he was born in Virginia and while ambassador, swindled the French out of the middle third of the US. I dont think he was serving french interests when he invited Lafeyette over to tour.

by Richard on Apr 16, 2014 10:45 am • linkreport

Really fascinating post - It's interesting to see the parallels to today's controversies form a century ago.

Quick nitpick: I think there's a problem in your links in this section "O'Connor exaggerated his hands and face to realize a psychological intensity that is present in only a few monumental sculptures in DC, Henry Schrady's Grant, and the Adams Memorial" - somehow Lincoln got squeezed out.

by Peter K on Apr 16, 2014 10:56 am • linkreport

I went through Franklin Square Park for about a year before it occurred to me that the John Barry statue was named for the very same man as the bridge in Philadelphia. I'd always just known solely from KYW traffic reports, without no first name except perhaps "Commodore".

by Bossi on Apr 16, 2014 11:00 am • linkreport

Good catch, Peter! I must have deleted that by accident.

by Neil Flanagan on Apr 16, 2014 11:04 am • linkreport

Fascinating story. I also just want to say -- I don't know why Franklin Square gets such a bad rap as a park. I worked a block away for 4 years, and I ate lunch out in Franklin for roughly the temperate half of the DC year (spring and fall). It is a wonderful neighborhood park for that purpose, and it attracts several hundred other workers every weekday for lunch.

by jt on Apr 16, 2014 11:12 am • linkreport

Very interesting. I like the statue exactly for the reasons they seemed not to have liked it back then. Does look like a bowrey scrapper. The rest of the memorial seems a bit stiff and ad hoc, especially the eagles.

by Thayer-D on Apr 16, 2014 12:12 pm • linkreport

Thayer, note how the Barry figure is set with feet on an uneven surface. That gives the feeling of motion and action, rather than "stand there for three hours while I carve you".

Barry's half-closed fist adds to the kinetic goodness, too.

by KadeKo on Apr 16, 2014 12:18 pm • linkreport

I think we should move the Barry statue to Yards Park near the U.S.S. Barry. He should be near water.

by David C on Apr 16, 2014 12:46 pm • linkreport

If someone found the portrait maquette, I'd throw in money to get it cast and put in the Smithsonian. It's a great statue on its own!

by Neil Flanagan on Apr 16, 2014 12:58 pm • linkreport

There is a statute of John Barry outside Independence Hall in Philadelphia,as well. While the name of John Paul Jones is more familiar, Barry was equally -- perhaps more important -- in the naval history of the Revolutionary War.

by Jasper2 on Apr 16, 2014 1:31 pm • linkreport

Don't necessarily like the word 'myth' associated with Barry, he was so much more: Sailor (Naval battle Captain), Soldier (participated as Gen. Cadwallader's Aide in Battle of Princeton) and Cowboy (drove a herd of Cattle with Gen. Wayne to feed Washington's troops). The man was a main reason why the Revolution was won!

by Mike McCormack on Apr 22, 2014 12:04 pm • linkreport

What a missed opportunity!

by Matt Sickle on Jun 16, 2014 8:22 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or