Greater Greater Washington

History


Lost Washington: The Army Medical Museum

The brick Romanesque Revival building originally located at the northwest corner of 7th and Independence, SW, was the successor to the Ford's Theatre facility. Opened in 1887, it was designed and built to house the Army Medical Museum, the Library of the Surgeon General's Office, and some of the medical records.

Between 1893 and 1910, it also housed the Army Medical School. The Museum and the Library remained in this location until the 1960s, when they were moved to their present separate locations. Even though the structure had been listed on the National Register of Historic Buildings, the Interior Department redefined its status, claiming that the collection of medical specimens within constituted the building's importance. The building was razed in 1969 and replaced by the Smithsonian's Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden.

The Army Medical Museum evolved into the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology and the National Museum of Health and Medicine, Washington, DC, and the Library of Surgeon General's Office became the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.



Top left: Army Medical Museum. Main exhibit hall, 1942. Top right: Interior of Surgeon General's library. Bottom left: Army Medical Museum, anatomical exhibit, 1/25/1920. Bottom right: Comparative anatomy, Auzoux model of horse, life size. Specimen no. 2635. All images courtesy of the Otis Archives Flickr Photostream.
Kent Boese posts items of historic interest primarily within the District. He's worked in libraries since 1994, both federal and law, and currently works on K Street. He lives in the Park View neighborhood, and is the force behind the blog Washington Kaleidoscope

Comments

Add a comment »

Home of John Dillinger's penis.

by Urban Legend on May 21, 2009 4:39 pm • linkreport

Anyone know where it's going when Walter Reed relocates and reorganizes in a few years?

by цarьchitect on May 21, 2009 5:26 pm • linkreport

my sources say that current plans are to move it to bethesda, although that could change.

by AJ on May 21, 2009 6:33 pm • linkreport

The Washington Post's Peter Carlson wrote about Dillinger's penis in a 2006 article that basically points out that the urban legend continues because of a dumb joke at the Smithsonian. See: http://urbanlegends.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?zi=1/XJ&sdn=urbanlegends&cdn=newsissues&tm=49&f=11&su=p504.1.336.ip_&tt=2&bt=1&bts=1&zu=http%3A//www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/23/AR2006012301854_pf.html

by Steven on May 22, 2009 5:44 am • linkreport

no one seems to have gotten it that Adolf Cluss was the architect of this masterpiece. Too bad they never show it in color- he was famous for using different colored bricks- which people from the 1940-70's era found obsolete- now it it has made a big comeback. At one time, a person could stand in the middle of the National Mall. and see Cluss buildings up and down the length of it. The neoclassical mode took over after the City Beautiful movement and then the modernists, who had little use for any tradition at all, so it was mistakenly destroyed.I have dim memories of this building as a small boy.

by w on May 22, 2009 8:48 am • linkreport

Yeah. Everybody knows that Dillinger's penis story is an urban legend.

It was actually Rasputin's penis.

by monkeyrotica on May 22, 2009 9:05 am • linkreport

Such a shame they tore that building down and built the Space Donut in its place.

God, the Hirshhorn is ugly.

by Chris on May 26, 2009 10:07 am • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or