Greater Greater Washington

Development


Sprawl is the only option at the Planning Board

Montgomery County is barreling blindly down a path to create a huge new pocket of sprawl outside Gaithersburg. Dubbed "Science City," the county envisions 20 million square feet of new biotechnology research and development on 900 acres near Rockville and Gaithersburg. However, as currently proposed, "Science City" is no city. The Board recently rejected two proposals, one to increase its density to something more city-like, and the other to transfer density to a better location. Creating sprawl is familiar and easy, but harmful. Unfortunately, it's the easier and safer choice for the Planning Board.

The area lies well beyond the part of our region currently served by transit. In theory, the Corridor Cities Transitway will serve this area, but officials still haven't agreed on an alignment, let alone secured funding. This only continues the county's pattern of planning "transit-oriented development" in areas far from existing transit, with only a faint hope of actually building the transit. And even if Maryland does somehow find money to build the line, a single light rail line can't possibly effectively bring transit accessibility to 900 acres.

Christopher Leinberger writes that "driveable sub-urbanism," the familiar suburban land pattern with big lawns and strip malls, generally has a floor-area ratio (FAR) between 0.05 and 0.3. In other words, for each acre of land, there is at most about 13,000 square feet (0.3 acres) of residential, office, retail and other building uses. Meanwhile, "walkable urbanism," with a lively street life, starts to work at 0.8 FAR, and best around 1.5 and up.

20 million square feet on 900 acres represents an FAR of 0.51, which falls in between the two ranges. Leinberger calls these areas "neverlands," and people find them depressing. The buildings are tall, taking away the pastorial countryside feel of suburban areas, but there isn't enough going on to create lively places, and everything is too far apart to walk. Le Corbusier's Radiant City was a "neverland," as are 1960s public housing projects, and most commonly, suburban office parks.

If Montgomery County wants a real "Science City," they should build an actual city. 20 million square feet is no city. The NoMA area of DC alone has 20 million square feet planned over ten years. And NoMa only spans about 240 acres, for an FAR of about 1.92. Of course, "Science City" could be a city without being as dense as NoMA; it could be half as dense, and still be a "city".

According to the Gazette, Johns Hopkins, seeking to maximize the value of their real estate investment in the area, proposed more density, up to 6.5 million square feet on their Belward Farm property (100 acres, for an FAR of about 0.8). They argued that the greater size would create a "critical mass" to attract federal agencies and increase the cost-effectiveness of the Corridor Cities Transitway. The Planning Board rejected this, however.

Jean Cryor, the member from Potomac who couldn't understand the problem with car-oriented design, argued that facts won't affect the CCT. "It's going to come or it's not going to come. It's going to be a political decision, no matter what anyone wants to say ... It's going to take the muscle that you have and everybody else has to make it happen. If [we] think it's just going to be on numbers, we're just kidding ourselves."

Of course, while a real city would be better than sprawl, if the County really wants a "Science City," they wouldn't be putting it in Gaithersburg. They'd put it on the eastern side of the county, near I-95 corridor and the Beltway. It could go near or along the Purple Line, near College Park and an existing, major university. There's also already considerable development planned along I-95, both private (like Konterra) and federal (like at Fort Meade). The eastern part of the county really needs development. There are two commuter rail lines and Amtrak, as well as Metro which state officials keep talking about extending. It's nearer to an airport. And it's nearer to the largest city in Maryland.

If planning happened more regionally, rather than having each county try to out-develop the other, Maryland would put Science City, and Johns Hopkins' development, in the large city it already has. Baltimore already contains Johns Hopkins, and could really benefit from more investment.

Neighbors opposed to the development at Belward Farm proposed an alternative, to provide transferable development rights encouraging development at Hopkins' existing Montgomery campus nearer Shady Grove (though still not particularly transit-accessible), but the Planning Board panned that idea as well.

Instead, Montgomery officials are set on building "neverland" density on open land at the edge of the region. Maybe some transit will one day reach this place, but no more than a tiny percentage of people will ever find that transit useful. CEOs who live in Potomac will enjoy a short, reverse commute ride, while blue-collar workers will have to pay lots of money to drive long distances on the toll Intercounty Connector.

The development will create huge demand for more housing in Frederick County, which has even less transit and fewer walkable places. The region's sprawl will grow while existing areas ripe for science investment lose out. All this will happen because our counties and other jurisdictions compete for development instead of planning regionally, and because the Montgomery Planning Board, so familiar with suburban-style office parks, can't envision anything else or lacks the courage to push for a better way.

Image from the Gaithersburg West draft Master Plan. Just drawing people walking in a "neverland" density development won't make it actually walkable. And the sky was already that gray; I didn't change the image at all.

David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington and Greater Greater Education. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater. 

Comments

Add a comment »

My last faint bit of optimism for this project has faded. I'm going to shift into full-opposition mode because of the lack of worthwhile planning going on.

Is it just that our planners are incapable of seeing all the destruction these kind of land use policies have wrought over the past sixty years? It's not just environmental, either. It's also economic and social.

Just frustrating.

by Cavan on May 27, 2009 11:23 am • linkreport

Montgomery County was more progressive-thinking 10 years ago than it is now. THAT is the truly sad part. This project is more like NoVa circa 1997.

As much as people like to criticize DC government, I think DC's planning, zoning, and DOT are superior to both their MD and VA counterparts.

by SG on May 27, 2009 12:07 pm • linkreport

I don't understand it either. I sometimes explain it to myself thusly: Either they do see and keep going b/c they're corrupt (someone's getting a payback or the brother-in-law is getting a business deal or they're more interested in personal short-term gain then anything else, etc." Or, for whatever reason they don't see/don't understand. Which is worse? I think the 'not seeing/not understanding' is worse. They can't be that stupid/willfully ignorant, can they? Corruption can be discovered and corrected, but how do you fix stupid? It's not like the information is difficult to find or there aren't voices bringing the information right to them. Yet this type of decision gets made as if we, collectively, haven't learned anything in 50 years.

by Bianchi on May 27, 2009 12:09 pm • linkreport

the planning board sounds like they r doing their best to prevent montgomery county from becoming the top bio-science hub in country which I don't really understand

by skinsfan on May 27, 2009 12:57 pm • linkreport

Wait--defeating sprawl means increasing density?! *sarcasm implied*

Once our leadership gets the connection, we'll finally have what we need to build cities, save resources, and make America more efficient.

by Andrew on May 27, 2009 2:30 pm • linkreport

You're right, why not put it out on I-95? The parochialism is astounding.

by Paz on May 27, 2009 3:21 pm • linkreport

They'd put it along the I-95 corridor. There's already considerable development planned there, both private (like Konterra) and federal (like at Fort Meade) . . .

As much as I agree with your post - and, of course, any push to put more development on the east side - I-95 IS NOT in Montgomery County. It's in Prince George's, as is Konterra. Fort Meade is east of 295 in Anne Arundel County. MoCo has no control over what happens on I-95 - nor do they have a lot of interest in nurturing it, because it would draw attention away from I-270, because that's all theirs.

The political divisions are tough. "Science City" would be a boon to East Montgomery County because of its proximity to FDA and the new Washington Adventist Hospital - but it would end up on P.G. soil. Or maybe Hopkins would push for a more compact form, requiring 200 acres instead of 900. There's room to do that on the east side. Either of those options would be better than what they're proposing.

I'm confident that Chairman Royce Hanson and director Rollin Stanley are committed to a more urban MoCo, but I'm not sure if they know what they're dealing with here. Stanley, especially, because he previously headed the planning departments in St. Louis and Toronto, suggesting he's not totally "there" when it comes to a suburban county.

by dan reed on May 27, 2009 3:25 pm • linkreport

I agree with the general sentiment, but Gaithersburg is not really the "edge of the region". One would have to go about 10 miles north of Gaithersburg for that.

Also, this post misses what I think is the most compelling reason why Gaithersburg is a bad place for 20 million square feet of jobs: The people who work in those jobs will live in Frederick County. The "Science City" isn't really sprawl; it is solidly located amidst existing development. Its real crime is that it will cause lots and lots of people to live much farther away than Gaithersburg.

by BeyondDC on May 27, 2009 6:24 pm • linkreport

@ dan reed

Maybe you misunderstood the article. Your points show you are NOT thinking regionally-- ubless you think MoCo is the only region that matters.

FWIW, I live in MoCo.

by Peter N on May 27, 2009 11:44 pm • linkreport

This distant, transit-inaccessible location is 20 miles from downtown DC and a few miles west of the end-of-the-line Shady Grove Metro station. Why is redevelopment of parking lots and obsolete strip malls around existing Metro stations not the priority? This is where we need to focus good planning for growth.

by ccort on May 28, 2009 5:23 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or