Greater Greater Washington

Budget


Bush transportation secretary's biggest disappointment: Bush

DC Velocity magazine has just released a lengthy interview with Norman Mineta, the Bush-era transportation secretary and former Democratic member of Congress.

min0_011.jpg
Former U.S. DOT chief Mineta (r.), with his biggest disappointment. (Photo: Academy of Achievement)

In the interview, Minetawho now works on infrastructure at the consulting firm Hill & Knowltonspoke openly about the transportation funding crisis and called for the Obama administration to reconsider its opposition to a VMT tax:

I think the "Vehicle Miles Traveled" program ought to be seriously considered. Even if you go to a VMT, you still have some form of tax. But the beauty of the VMT approach is that all you look at is how many miles you travel on the highway. It captures activity regardless of energy source.

Mineta also showed refreshing candor in describing his biggest disappointment during five years at the Bush White House: the former president's staunch refusal to reform the gas tax. Mineta explained that he planned in 2001 to pay for a $330 billion federal transportation bill increase gas taxes by 2 cents per gallon in the first, third and fifth years of the six-year legislation. But here's what happened, per Mineta:

We went to the Oval Office, and after we went through the entire presentation, President Bush takes a marker, circles the gas tax increases, and says, "Norm, I don't want any of those tax increases. Get those out."

So Mineta pared his proposal back, suggesting merely to index the gas tax to inflationwhich has already worked for six state governments and could soon become law in Bush's home state of Texas. But alas, Bush couldn't let go of his fondness for running deficits in the name of "fiscal conservatism":

We returned to the Oval Office, went through the presentation, and afterward President Bush said, "Norm, that's a tax increase. Get that out." So I then took all the unobligated surplus, left $1 billion in the highway trust fund, and used the balance to build a $267 billion surface transportation program that Congress finally passed in 2005. Not long after, the administration asked for an $8 billion infusion of general funds into the highway trust fund so it wouldn't be running a deficit by 2007.

Cross-posted from Streetsblog.

Elana Schor is Streetsblog's national reporter, covering federal transportation policy in Washington and nationwide. She has covered Capitol Hill for The Hill, The Guardian, and Talking Points Memo, and lives in Mount Pleasant. 

Comments

Add a comment »

Just a metacomment - while these crossposted things are interesting, it really seems asinine to have, in this case, three out of the four newest articles from Streetsblog. Great site, but if I want Streetsblog, I'll read Streetsblog. What brought me to GGW was the local stuff which is now at risk of being buried. By all means link Streetsblog in a links post or otherwise share what they have to say if it's groundbreaking, but please, no more crossposts, they're just silly IMO.

by Scott on Jun 2, 2009 10:11 pm • linkreport

VMT, as Mineta promotes, downshifts the motivation for moving toward greater fuel efficiency. Let's up gasoline taxes to levels needed to maintain the road infrastructure. Consider moving to different income structure when, for example, over 50% of miles driven are on electricity. E.g., use gasoline impact fees for the next 15+ years.

by A Siegel on Jun 2, 2009 10:31 pm • linkreport

I love Norm. He gave some friends of mine really nice jobs, and I remember when he came to the memorial service for a local (suburban) asian merchant who was murdered -- more or less on his own.

However, VMT is nothing but a bad hangover from Bush era years, and Norm has to pay the bills now, so he takes the money from some tolling firms.

The answer to our problems is much simpler (and painful): a gas tax. At some point we'll need to fight against gas taxes (like we need to fight parking fines in DC) but right now we need a higher one . Or at least the threat of higher ones in the near future.

by charlie on Jun 2, 2009 10:48 pm • linkreport

VMT is a dumb idea. It doesn't incentivize efficiency and it would penalize rural people more than hiking the gas tax. It also would be cumbersome to collect. Mineta was stupid for hanging around as long as he did. Bush was a thoughtless, uncreative moron, but we know that already. Even Republicans and conservatives are happy to forget him.

by Rich on Jun 2, 2009 11:02 pm • linkreport

Agree with Scott...this crossposting from Streetsblog is starting to become overkill.

Also agree with A Siegel, charlie, and Rich regarding VMT vs. gas tax. Gas tax is still the way to go at this time.

by Froggie on Jun 3, 2009 6:48 am • linkreport

@Scott, Froggie: Agreed. I can read streetsblog for this. I would encourage GGW contributors to not worry so much about quantity of content. Everything you do is great! Please slow down with the crossposting.

by JTS on Jun 3, 2009 9:02 am • linkreport

Raising the gas tax for improved public transport is a perfectly fine concept.

The VMT though is absolutely unnecessary more complex way of doing things that is simply another front for creating mass databases of all of our travels. It dovetails perfectly with the new police car license plate reader cameras that not only red flag 'interesting' plates to the cop, but also records EVERY plate into a permanent data base to allow the authorities to build profiles of everyone.

As per the cross-posting, I am okay with it, especially as it appears that this blog is utterly uncritical of Streetsblog.

by Douglas Willinger on Jun 3, 2009 12:12 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or