Budget
Bush transportation secretary's biggest disappointment: Bush
DC Velocity magazine has just released a lengthy interview with Norman Mineta, the Bush-era transportation secretary and former Democratic member of Congress.
In the interview, Mineta
I think the "Vehicle Miles Traveled" program ought to be seriously considered. Even if you go to a VMT, you still have some form of tax. But the beauty of the VMT approach is that all you look at is how many miles you travel on the highway. It captures activity regardless of energy source.
Mineta also showed refreshing candor in describing his biggest disappointment during five years at the Bush White House: the former president's staunch refusal to reform the gas tax. Mineta explained that he planned in 2001 to pay for a $330 billion federal transportation bill increase gas taxes by 2 cents per gallon in the first, third and fifth years of the six-year legislation. But here's what happened, per Mineta:
We went to the Oval Office, and after we went through the entire presentation, President Bush takes a marker, circles the gas tax increases, and says, "Norm, I don't want any of those tax increases. Get those out."
So Mineta pared his proposal back, suggesting merely to index the gas tax to inflation
We returned to the Oval Office, went through the presentation, and afterward President Bush said, "Norm, that's a tax increase. Get that out." So I then took all the unobligated surplus, left $1 billion in the highway trust fund, and used the balance to build a $267 billion surface transportation program that Congress finally passed in 2005. Not long after, the administration asked for an $8 billion infusion of general funds into the highway trust fund so it wouldn't be running a deficit by 2007.
Cross-posted from Streetsblog.
Comments
- Bikeshare is a gateway to private biking, not competition
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools
- Long-term closures: A solution to single-tracking?
- Metro policy for refunds after delays falls short, riders say
- M Street cycle track keeps improving, draws church anger
- O'Malley announces first projects using new gas tax money
- Cyclists are special and do have their own rules





by Scott on Jun 2, 2009 10:11 pm • link • report
by A Siegel on Jun 2, 2009 10:31 pm • link • report
However, VMT is nothing but a bad hangover from Bush era years, and Norm has to pay the bills now, so he takes the money from some tolling firms.
The answer to our problems is much simpler (and painful): a gas tax. At some point we'll need to fight against gas taxes (like we need to fight parking fines in DC) but right now we need a higher one . Or at least the threat of higher ones in the near future.
by charlie on Jun 2, 2009 10:48 pm • link • report
by Rich on Jun 2, 2009 11:02 pm • link • report
Also agree with A Siegel, charlie, and Rich regarding VMT vs. gas tax. Gas tax is still the way to go at this time.
by Froggie on Jun 3, 2009 6:48 am • link • report
by JTS on Jun 3, 2009 9:02 am • link • report
The VMT though is absolutely unnecessary more complex way of doing things that is simply another front for creating mass databases of all of our travels. It dovetails perfectly with the new police car license plate reader cameras that not only red flag 'interesting' plates to the cop, but also records EVERY plate into a permanent data base to allow the authorities to build profiles of everyone.
As per the cross-posting, I am okay with it, especially as it appears that this blog is utterly uncritical of Streetsblog.
by Douglas Willinger on Jun 3, 2009 12:12 pm • link • report
Add a Comment