<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252" standalone="yes"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title>Comments on Orangington? - Greater Greater Washington</title>
    <description>All comments posted by users on the Greater Greater Washington post "Orangington?"</description>
    <link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/</link>
	<atom:link rel="self" href="http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/rss" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <language>en-us</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment by the lone oranger</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-28854</link>
		<description>all this nonsense talk about naming a neighborhood after the color of the train that passes by on a daily basis. It's bad enough that metro stop names are neighborhood names. Or are the neighborhoods named after the metro stops? It's the age old question, what came first the chicken or the egg? What came first, Orangington or the Orange Line train? Don't see that the Orange Line is an institution in itself. It is its own state of being. It needs no neighborhood. If anything, the neighborhoods need it, regardless of its spontaneous short comings and delays.
&lt;p&gt;nuff said&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-28854</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:36:43 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by SDJ</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27883</link>
		<description>I think the Clarendon-Wilson Corridor could be called the "C-W" or the "C-dub". Orangington is not three syllables it's an akward three and a half syllables and kind of sounds like "Orangutan". Okay, so maybe orangutans are orange too.
&lt;p&gt;As for the Red Line corridor, I think "Conn Ave" for Connecticut Avenue and "Wiskey Ave" for Wisconsin work really well!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27883</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:37:12 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by dono</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27601</link>
		<description>The O.C. (the Orange [line] corridor)
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27601</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:10:08 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Squalish</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27571</link>
		<description>RBC(or some expansion therein) or Rallston are favorite creative picks so far... but "Downtown Arlington" seems like the default name, and the one more likely to predominate as an auxiliary name when the neighborhoods won't suffice.
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27571</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:52:26 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Cathedral Heights</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27539</link>
		<description>"The Place DC People go to Smoke in Bars"
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27539</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:30:18 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Brett</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27533</link>
		<description>Orangington doesn't work for me. what about "Greater Clarendon", or "Downtown Arlington."
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27533</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:44:34 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Josh</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27524</link>
		<description>Yeah, leaving out the terrible and meaningless sound, the tryingtoohardington factor, and the fact that the Orange line serves a much greater area, so it's not even geographically neat, it's great.
&lt;p&gt;Not to mention, every place within your proposed "orangington" already has a name. If you say you're going to organgington, where are you going? If you say you live there, where do you live? It begs the question. Skip right to the actual answer - let's meet up in Clarendon. I work in Rosslyn. Last night we went to Ballston to see a movie.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GGW - creating problems where none existed....&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27524</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:35:13 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by EthanJ</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27512</link>
		<description>Rosslyn + Ballston = Rallston
&lt;p&gt;The initial vowels in Rosslyn and Ballston sound very similar - combine them and you get a short and obvious word. Except for the spelling...&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27512</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:51:16 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by crin</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27507</link>
		<description>Or maybe just Clarendon.
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27507</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:20:25 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by mhoek</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27502</link>
		<description>go with something "Wilson" related. As the main corridor that ties that series of stations together I think it will be the least contrived and most recognizable choice. "The WB" perhaps (dat dum tsh).
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27502</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:13:11 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Rob</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27494</link>
		<description>I'd rather repurpose the name somebody already came up with--Nearlington: &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://dcist.com/2005/12/09/just_how_far_is.php"&gt;http://dcist.com/2005/12/09/just_how_far_is.php&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm not opposed to "Uptown Arlington" either, though that name only really works if you omit Rosslyn.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27494</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:02:43 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Tim</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27491</link>
		<description>The area does seem to need a name, but no matter how you slice it, anything with "orange" in it sounds awkward.
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27491</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:02:05 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Reid</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27490</link>
		<description>Doesn't it always work out that you find yourself talking about the most trivial crap when a tragedy hits?
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27490</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:54:49 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by stevek_fairfax</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27489</link>
		<description>Wilson
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27489</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:41:32 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Caro</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27486</link>
		<description>What about "Central Arlington" or "Downtown Arlington," kind of like "Downtown Silver Spring"?
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27486</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:38:29 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Jeanne</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27482</link>
		<description>sorry, but I just don't see "Orangington" sticking. I do think "OLC" as shorthand for Orange Line Corridor has lots of potential though. I'm going to start using it.&lt;br&gt;
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27482</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:32:26 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by BeyondDC</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27481</link>
		<description>English fail, seriously. I didn't realize orange is a two-syllable word :facepalm: But I certainly don't say it that way.
&lt;p&gt;So not four syllable Or-anj-ing-ton... three syllable orn-ging-ton.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It doesn't sound like orangutan at all.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27481</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:15:29 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by BeyondDC</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27480</link>
		<description>I guess technically speaking orange is a two syllable word, but does anybody actually say it that way? I don't pronounce the a.
&lt;p&gt;Like Wednesday. Nobody really pronounces the d.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27480</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:10:39 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Joey</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27479</link>
		<description>Sorry, David's unicode/UTF-8 character translations must be quirked up.
&lt;p&gt;What I was going for was the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;--------&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;@BDC, how is it the same number of syllables as Washington, Arlington, and Shirlington? Orange (OR.anj) is two syllables. Or.ange.ing.ton is four, not three as in "Washington".&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even then, I'm not sure how to pronounce it as written. Washington and Arlington follow the format WASH.ing.TON and AR.ling.TON. Is it OR.an.jing.TON, or is it or.ANJ.ing.TON, or or.AN.jing.TON, or maybe or.ANG.ing.TON? If it were three syllables with a drawl, I suppose it could be AURNJ.ing.TON?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27479</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:41:49 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Joey</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27477</link>
		<description>@BDC, how is it the same number of syllables as Washington, Arlington, and Shirlington? OrÂ·ange is two syllables. OrÂ·angeÂ·ingÂ·ton is four, not three as in "Washington".
&lt;p&gt;Even then, I'm not sure how to pronounce it as written. Washington and Arlington follow the format WASHÂ·ingÂ·TON and ARÂ·lingÂ·TON. Is it ORÂ·anÂ·jingÂ·TON, or is it orÂ·ANJÂ·ingÂ·TON, or maybe orÂ·ANGÂ·ingÂ·TON? If it were three syllables with a drawl, I suppose it could be AURNJÂ·ingÂ·TON?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;@Tsarchitect: Of course I refer to the Red-line neighborhoods by name. The issue at hand is what to call an entire corridor of closely-spaced linear metro neighborhoods. Saying "I live along the Orange line" seems to do the trick. "Central Arlington" would work too, if it were understood.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27477</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:38:16 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Vik</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27475</link>
		<description>I agree that saying Orange-ing is awkward. Saying it fast...it just doesn't flow right.
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27475</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:14:17 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by tom veil</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27474</link>
		<description>How about naming it for its easternmost and westernmost stations -- Bal-lyn? After all, if you can afford to live near the Ballyn metro stops, then you're ballin'.
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27474</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:13:28 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Vik</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27472</link>
		<description>I like RBC of what I've seen on this thread so far. That and Tryingtoohardagain.
&lt;p&gt;Orangeington isn't bad, but it's almost forcing it. Like Frank Costanza's The Manssiere.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I do like the concept though. The area has a name, it's just too long, so a new name or the initials being used sounds like a good idea to me.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27472</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:12:34 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Justin</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27471</link>
		<description>I didn't say "hard" to pronounce, I said akward. "Orange" is a kind of awkward word in the first place, and putting two "ng"s so close together makes it awkward. Not necessarily hard to say, just unappealing.
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27471</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:11:26 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Stuart</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27470</link>
		<description>Orangington is unimaginative and awkward to pronounce. Far worse of a moniker than what I'd previously considered to be a proliferation of clumsy and uninspired names in Virginia: Fairlandria, Arlandria, Fairlington..&lt;br&gt;
Why bother with Orangington, and why not just call it Orange? Orange is a place name used by many towns and counties. Or just call it Arlington, because it's generally clear what parts of Arlington people mean, and if need be you can always specify "off the Orange Line."&lt;br&gt;
WTF, GGW, this is something I hope to see mentioned on why.i.hate.dc.&lt;br&gt;
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27470</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:08:41 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by BeyondDC</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27469</link>
		<description>How is it hard to pronounce? Orange-ing-ton. Easy. Same number of syllables as Washington, Arlington or Shirlington, and similar vowel-consonant arrangement.
&lt;p&gt;It is definitely awkward to spell, but I don't concede at all that it's hard to pronounce.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27469</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:06:25 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Aaron</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27468</link>
		<description>I think that line would have better been "The Bozzle, Razzle, Cozzle, and the Clizzle Dizzle"
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27468</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:04:27 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Alex B.</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27467</link>
		<description>Tenleytown refers to Tenleytown - not the entire Red Line corridor.
&lt;p&gt;Likewise, each of the station areas has its own name and identity already. Hell, the rap alone emphasized this - the clizzle dizzle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can't really think of any other areas of a similar scale with just one name.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27467</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:00:15 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Justin</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27466</link>
		<description>Another problem is the confusion that would be created with the existing neighborhood names. We already have Ballston, Clarendon, Courthouse and Rosslyn... these are distinct names and people pretty much know where they are. They don't need to be linked together with a catchy new name... Orange Line Corridor will do if you absolutely need to refer to the area as a whole.
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27466</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:55:55 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by &#1094;ar&#1100;chitect</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27465</link>
		<description>What the hell Joey? Really, no Tenleytown? No Cleveland Park? No Tobago?
&lt;p&gt;Or do you just mean that the corridor has no name?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27465</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:55:32 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Joey</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27464</link>
		<description>I'm with Justin.
&lt;p&gt;Why does it need a name other than something like "central Arlington"?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What do people call the Red Line stretch from Woodley Park to Friendship Heights? It's about the same length, with comparably spaced stations. I usually just call that whole region "Upper Northwest".&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27464</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:50:45 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by &#1094;ar&#1100;chitect</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27462</link>
		<description>Harbington, because it is a harbinger of the smart growth that came after it?
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27462</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:46:37 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27460</link>
		<description>How about Tryingtoohardington?
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27460</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:45:14 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Arlen</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27459</link>
		<description>I like where Ñ†arÑŒchitect is going with that, but I also like tying in the Arlington moniker: Arbington? Arbeengton? RBington?
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27459</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:38:55 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Justin</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27458</link>
		<description>Sorry, but Orangington is a god awful choice. Beyond the fact that it's awkward to spell and pronounce, it'll take about 5 minutes before people start calling it "Orangutan."
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27458</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:33:16 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by &#1094;ar&#1100;chitect</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27457</link>
		<description>Arbie, or Arbieton.
&lt;p&gt;One does wonder what it would really take to make the name stick...&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27457</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:32:34 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Joshua</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27456</link>
		<description>BeyondDC
&lt;p&gt;Yeah that seems a little better. Without the e I thought it was pronounced like Orangutan before reading the post. Maybe Arlington should hold a contest to choose a name. That way they can get publicity for the name change.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27456</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:31:42 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Mike Wagoner</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27455</link>
		<description>I always refer to the orange line corridor as The R.B.C. - short for Rosslyn - Ballston Corridor.
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27455</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:31:24 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Roger</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27454</link>
		<description>It looks too much like "Orangutan." Geographically (as part of Arlington County), would the appropriate name be "The Middle East"??
&lt;p&gt;How about something that incorporates the letters of the 5 Metro stations: BVCCR? Of course, the only thing that comes immediately to mind is BoVine CanCeR, which probably doesn't pass the marketing muster... ;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OK, how about Orangeburg?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27454</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:30:25 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Chris Loos</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27453</link>
		<description>I vote for the O.L.C. It has that nice "LBC" rhythm to it.
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27453</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:26:58 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by BeyondDC</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27452</link>
		<description>You're right dcpatton. "North Arlington" means everything north of 50. I wasn't saying 29 is the border; I was saying the term isn't good for the R-B corridor because it covers such a vast area, *including* (but not *only*) the area north of 29.
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27452</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:26:05 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by iammrben</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27451</link>
		<description>To take a cue from Matt!, why not just The Corridor?
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27451</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:25:43 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by dcpatton</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27450</link>
		<description>I think North Arlington is north of 50 (not 29). Unless you break off The O.C. from it.
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27450</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:20:52 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Simon</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27449</link>
		<description>Arlington High Street.
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27449</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:17:35 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Matt!</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27448</link>
		<description>I vote for The O.L.C. (Orange Line Corridor) Or heck, even The O.C. Just think of all the drama that will ensue!
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27448</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:17:31 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by BeyondDC</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27446</link>
		<description>What if you add an "e"... Orangeington? Technically speaking it shouldn't be there, but IMO it reads easier.
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27446</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:14:38 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Joshua</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27445</link>
		<description>I don't know. The word looks hard to pronounce, and that alone will leave people thinking Orangington is a dangerous place, at least if &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://sitemaker.umich.edu/norbert.schwarz/files/09_ps_song___schwarz_fluency___risk.pdf"&gt;this one study&lt;/a&gt; is to be believed. However I will agrea saying the Rosslyn-Ballston Corridor takes to long and the area needs a better name. Maybe Mid Arlington or Arlington Central?
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27445</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:13:03 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by BeyondDC</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27444</link>
		<description>Well, y'know, all new names sound weird at first. It was this or "Wilsonia" ;)
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27444</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:10:07 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Cavan</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27443</link>
		<description>How about Orangeton? No need for the "ing." Great thinking, though. The R-B corridor is grown up and has its own sense of place as a whole, in addition to it having the separate neighborhoods. It deserves a good name.
</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27443</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:09:43 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment by Dave Murphy</title>
		<link>http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27442</link>
		<description>What, you don't think it will get confused with the Cheverly-New Carrollton corridor? (Of course, I am joking).
&lt;p&gt;Frankly I think it's a bit of an awkward moniker, but hey, that might make it all the more fitting.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/2673/orangington/#comment-27442</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:07:00 EDT</pubDate>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
