Greater Greater Washington

Budget


Filling DC’s newest revenue hole

Just a few years ago, the Chief Financial Officer's "quarterly revenue forecast" was something DC officials looked forward to because boom times meant surplus money to spend. Now that we're in a recession, the forecasts are increasingly gloomy because falling tax revenue causes budget shortfalls. And when that happens, Mayor Fenty and the Council must find cuts or revenue increases to close the deficit.


Photo by Fiber!

The just-released June revenue forecast shows a new $190 million shortfall for this fiscal year and $150 million for 2010. Over the past year, projected 2010 revenues have dropped nearly $1 billion, making this fiscal crisis one of the worst in DC's home-rule history. With unemployment and food stamp rolls at record levels, it's a major economic crisis for families, too.

As DC's CFO notes, there is only one real choice for addressing the 2009 shortfall: tapping DC's $330 million rainy day fund. With fiscal year 2009 nearly three-fourths over, there are no realistic budget-cutting options. Even if the police and fire departments, libraries and parks were shut down entirely for the next 3 months, we wouldn't save enough. And it is too late to quickly implement tax or fee increases.

Drawing from the rainy fund is not as easy as it should be, however. Congress created onerous rules a decade ago requiring the Districts to repay such withdrawals in a year. They since have relaxed repayment to two years, but that still is more restrictive than in nearly all states, which typically wait until their budgets return to surplus to replenish their rainy day funds. Considering that DC's rainy day fund comes from local tax dollars – not a penny of federal funds – the Congressional restrictions are maddeningly unfair.

So as the city taps the rainy day fund, DC leaders also need to make the very reasonable request that Congress eliminate the restrictive repayment rules.

That will get us only to September 30, the end of fiscal year 2009. What do we do after that? Over the past year, Mayor Fenty and the Council adopted numerous belt-tightening measures, but they were able to largely leave core services intact. They raised some revenues, but in pretty safe way, like parking enforcement. As the Mayor and Council face a new shortfall — that could get even bigger — they are likely to have make some unpopular choices to cut real services and raise revenues. Doing so in a way that protects our most vital services, particularly for residents suffering from the economic downturn, will be their challenge.

Ed Lazere is the Executive Director of the DC Fiscal Policy Institute, which conducts research and public education on budget and tax issues in the District of Columbia, with a particular emphasis on issues that affect low- and moderate-income residents. 

Comments

Add a comment »

and while you asking congress for favors, make sure to ask them to turn the CFO into a regular city employee instead of an independent fiefdom. This shortfall is entirely predictable, and if Dr. Gandhi was more concerned with speaking truth to power than with making himself look good, you would have more than 3 months to prepare for this.

Although, frankly, turning off the police for 3 months is a pretty hilarious idea.

by charlie on Jun 24, 2009 12:00 pm • linkreport

It's important to note that as much as people like to bash DC government (even VA and MD residents whose states are in worse shape fiscally), they have been more responsible than almost any other jurisdiction. They've consistently balanced budgets without cutting core services (as you mentioned) rather than rely on huge deficits or enormous bond issuances. Places like California need to face reality sooner rather than later.

Another thing to remember is that these deficits don't take into account the large amount of federal money that *will* be flowing in over the next year in the form of stimulus funds. A few hundred million for education alone, and nearly a billion total. It should help plug the dam in the near term, but the only thing that can help states in the longterm is a return to economic growth. Easier said than done.

by SG on Jun 24, 2009 12:03 pm • linkreport

I think an imploding economy counts as "a rainy day." Problem is, the Council seems more than happy to risk its bond rating by financing a freaking hotel (?!) next to the Convention Center. And it's not like the neighborhood isn't already littered with hotels. So good luck borrowing any more money when DC hits junk bond status.

Of course, by then Marion Barry will be Mayor and it'll be like DC circa 1985 again.

by monkeyrotica on Jun 24, 2009 12:34 pm • linkreport

SG; I'm not jumping on the DC government, which has two pretty decent mayors, but lets be honest: one reason why things aren't worse is that the constant threat of the fiscal control board has kept the mayor and council in line.

Again, they have know for a year that a fiscal nightmare is upon us. I figure the noise they are making now is more about cutting up the federal stimulus dollars rather than making real cuts.

by charlie on Jun 24, 2009 2:50 pm • linkreport

SG - I believe that the stimulus funds *have* been calculated into the budget and revenue forecast. I echo your call for a return to economic growth (or at least stability), but DC government (including Council and Mayor) needs to take responsibility for being a bit too development-happy, and a bit too naive when it comes to past budget surplus.

by ell_en on Jun 24, 2009 4:00 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or