Greater Greater Washington

Pedestrians


DDOT's pedestrian safety improvements forget the part that protects pedestrians

After an SUV driver struck and killed a pedestrian at the "Death Star" intersection of 15th, W, Florida and New Hampshire at 10:30 am on May 30, DDOT Director Gabe Klein released a draft plan of safety improvements for this dangerous crossroads. By not closing the dangerous "slip lane" from 15th Street to W Street and Florida Avenue, the draft proposal did not improve the intersection as much as it should have. However, the plan included bike lanes and reduced lane widths, both steps in the right direction.


Two steps to hitting a pedestrian at 15th & W.

But between the draft plan released by Director Klein and the on-the-ground changes in place now, a few things got lost in translation. Most noticeably, DDOT didn't install the quick curbs, intended to reduce the turning radius at the intersection and reduce the distance pedestrians must cross. Without these temporary physical barriers, some drivers will continue make high-speed, wide turns and needlessly endanger people in crosswalks.

It's unclear whether the quick curb was axed from the plan within DDOT before the intersection improvements were approved for implementation, or if DDOT still hasn't gotten around to installing this crucial addition to the intersection, but they did put barriers into the triangular striped area south of the intersection, which isn't the part in need of traffic calming.

The original plan (below) calls for quick curbs at both ends of the crosswalk along the south side of W, and around the small island in the middle. DDOT painted stripes, but didn't install barriers. The photo, taken looking south from Florida Ave, shows how cars commonly drive in the striped area.


If the draft proposal didn't go far enough, the plan as implemented barely goes anywhere at all. While striping adjustments were necessary, simple lines of paint are not enough to significantly improve safety at this dangerous intersection in the short-term. This adjustment was supposed to be a temporary fix so that DDOT can observe the intersection for six months before hiring a consultant for a complete redesign. If DDOT eliminated the quick curb from this plan, the outlook is dim for a more meaningful permanent redesign down the road.

Someone died here. It's time for bold steps to fix this intersection, which residents have been complaining about for a long time. DDOT should use its quick curbs to make significant changes, then see how well they work, instead of watering down and already-mild concept and leaving a dangerous intersection virtually unchanged.

Stephen Miller lived in the District from 2008 to 2011 and is now a student at Pratt Institute's city and regional planning masters program. 

Comments

Add a comment »

Has anyone asked about the status of the implementation? I certainly agree that the current state of the intersection is inconsistent with the plans presented earlier this Summer, so it will be nice to know if this is an incomplete phase or if the missing elements were dropped.

If the latter, then certainly we should be collectively pressing DDOT on what happened. However, I am willing to give the short term benefit of doubt until we hear otherwise.

Thanks for bringing it to the attention of GGW followers!

by Andrew on Jul 13, 2009 11:51 am • linkreport

We have unofficial information that makes us believe it's the latter, and that the rest of the plan got cut based on internal processes. We haven't been able to get any official confirmation, however.

by David Alpert on Jul 13, 2009 11:55 am • linkreport

That's a shame, I saw a pile of bricks on one of the islands and was hoping they were meant to fill in the area of the temporary curbs. I can't believe DDOT thinks a new paint job is going to change how people use the intersection.

by Steve on Jul 13, 2009 12:13 pm • linkreport

Same problem at 5th & I & Mass NW. Yesterday I saw 3 cars stopped waiting to cross 5th, and all of them were in the striped zone where I is supposed to be narrowed.

by tom veil on Jul 13, 2009 12:45 pm • linkreport

This is unfortunate, but not surprising. I've lost my faith in DDOT. I am aware that the previous statment sounds ridiculous.

by JTS on Jul 13, 2009 1:09 pm • linkreport

That's not a bump-out, that's a marked turning lane. Obviously.

by crin on Jul 13, 2009 1:23 pm • linkreport

Someone died here. It's time for bold steps to fix this intersection, which residents have been complaining about for a long time. DDOT should use its quick curbs to make significant changes, then see how well they work, instead of watering down and already-mild concept and leaving a dangerous intersection virtually unchanged.

My God, man! you do realize that what you're proposing is a WAR ON DRIVERS don't you!?!

by ibc on Jul 13, 2009 1:24 pm • linkreport

The director of DDOT spoke at the ANC 2B meeting last week. I was pretty impressed with him. Before criticizing his efforts with this interesection, perhaps we should give it/him a chance first.

by Lance on Jul 13, 2009 2:52 pm • linkreport

DC needs to start by having no green turn arrow that comes on while a pedestrian green "walk" sign is also on. Otherwise it's like telling drivers to run into pedestrians.

by Tom Coumaris on Jul 13, 2009 3:06 pm • linkreport

totally not a helpful suggestion but a fun "revenge fantasy" i have whenever i encounter dangerous drivers that come within inches of killing me (as a cyclist or pedestrian).

i love to picture that, wherever a driver hits a cyclist or pedestrian, that block or intersection is closed to motor vehicle traffic for 6 months. with and explanation, and the name and photo of the driver responsible for the closure.

(i'm also exactly the type of person who loves to see judges do things like this: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-453210/Judge-orders-shoplifters-wear-Im-thief-signs.html so take that for what it's worth).

by Catherine on Jul 14, 2009 12:00 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or