Greater Greater Washington. The Washington, DC area is great. But it could be greater.

Transit


Passenger flow for individual Metro stations

In late July, I wrote about passenger flows on the Metro system. Unfortunately, the study had to cope with limitations in the data from Metro. Better data would certainly yield more informative results, we can perhaps glean some more information from the existing data. Some readers asked about breaking down the data to create flow maps for individual stations.



Flow maps for various Metro stations. Top row: Vienna, New Carrollton, Ballston.
Bottom row: Bethesda, Farragut North, Farragut West. See below for larger versions.

To estimate the ridership on each link of the Metro system, we assigned trips from each origin/destination station pair to a given route based on a survey. While the survey was unscientific, it did give us insight into how Metro riders choose their routes within the system. If we look at a given station, according to Metro's data, we can tell how many passengers are traveling to any other given station. Our model assigns those trips to certain links based on a decision tree created from the survey results. A look at this data won't tell us when the majority of riders are boarding at a given station, but it does tell us where they're going.

Take, for example, Vienna. Based on what we know about the station, it is safe to assume that most riders are boarding in the morning and traveling toward downtown. While it is clear that some of the boardings at Vienna do take place during off-peak periods and in the evening rush, with the data we have, we can't say how many.

The above map shows the passenger flow of boardings at Vienna. Most riders are going to downtown. The majority of passengers have exited by the time their train reaches L'Enfant Plaza. Few transfer to other lines.

A look at the other end of the Orange Line shows a similar trend. In this case, passengers boarding at New Carrollton have mostly alighted by the time their train gets to Farragut West. Only a few continue farther west. Similarly, not very many transfer to other lines.

Looking at a station closer to the core, we can see that at Ballston, which has a healthy mix of offices and residential, mostly sees trips toward downtown. Remember that we can't tell when these trips are occurring, but this seems to indicate that people are either commuting from Ballston to downtown (AM) and back (PM) or from downtown to Ballston (AM) and back (PM). It seems more likely that the majority are downtown-bound in the AM. Some trips do head toward Vienna. The links west of Ballston either show people from the suburbs riding from Vienna to Ballston and back (their PM trip being captured here) or Ballstonians commuting to Vienna (AM captured here) and back, although it's actually a combination of both directions of travel.

A look at a similar activity center on the Red Line, Bethesda, shows similar results. Most trips whose origin is at Bethesda are headed for downtown. Some passengers do head toward Shady Grove, however. But as before, we cannot be certain of the time of day when these trips are occurring, and therefore cannot tell for certain which the predominant direction of travel is at a given time.

A little farther down the Red Line at Cleveland Park, it appears that most trips are bound for downtown. Other urban stops of a similar nature probably show similar results.

Looking at the central business district yields some interesting results as well. Unsurprisingly, passengers bound from the Farragut Square area to destinations in Montgomery County tend to board at Farragut North while passengers bound for Virginia enter the system at Farragut West. Not as many Farragut West customers are headed toward New Carrollton and Largo as Virginia, but there is some travel to the east. Perhaps the most notable piece of information to be gleaned from these maps revolves around Green Line-bound passengers. While not many passengers bound toward Greenbelt or Branch Avenue board at either of the Farragut twins, most of those who do board at Farragut North.


For some reason there is a preference for the Red Line for passengers headed toward the Green Line. To some degree this could be a habitual behavior remaining from the period 1993-1999 when Green Line trains from Greenbelt shared with the Red Line between Brookland and Farragut North. More likely, however, patrons probably value the Red Line's higher frequency and shorter trip to the nearest Green Line transfer station (Gallery Place). On the other hand, it could just be that more workers are concentrated at Farragut North and those headed for Orange are willing to walk to Farragut West, but Green Line riders don't see the need.

*NOTE: All maps are to scale. The thickness of the lines on each map is comparable to the thickness of the lines on all the other maps. The thicker the line, the higher the ridership.

Crossposted at Track Twenty-Nine.

Matt Johnson has lived in the Washington region since mid-2007. He has a Master's degree in Community Planning from the University of Maryland and a BS in Public Policy from Georgia Tech. He has worked in the planning field since 2006 and lives in Greenbelt, where he serves on the city's Advisory Planning Board. 

Comments

Add a comment »

These data, and common sense, would strongly argue for express trains. e.g regular red line to Bethesda, then express to Dupont circle.

by SJE on Aug 10, 2009 10:51 am  (link)

@SJE: At what cost, and priority over which other transit expansions? A new parallel Red Line tunnel to allow that service would run into the billions.

by Joey on Aug 10, 2009 11:13 am  (link)

SJE, I think we can all agree that express lines would be nice. However, they would cost as much as building entirely new lines that would serve new places. The economic and environmental benefits of the new lines would far outweigh the benefits of the redundant lines.

by Cavan on Aug 10, 2009 11:17 am  (link)

Thanks again for the maps.

What really strikes me is the lack of transfers. You don't see that many Bethesda trips to L'Enfant. There is an even larger dearth of Vienna or Ballston riders transferring to the Blue Line for the Pentagon and Crystal City. Direct, one seat rides to the core do seem to predominate.

It would take a survey to find out, but it looks like red line riders prefer to walk a couple blocks downtown rather than transfer to the blue/orange to get to the Federal Triangle, etc., stops. Ditto for the Blue/Orange Riders to get to Gallery Place. Knowing how far, and under what street conditions, people are willing to walk at the end of a transit trip would be an important planning consideration.

The road bridge bottleneck from Virginia to downtown DC does seem to provide a significant trip competitiveness to Metro that isn't as present in the Pentagon/Crystal City/Rosslyn stations.

by Brian D on Aug 10, 2009 11:20 am  (link)

Are enlarged pocket tracks a viable answer to allow some express trains? I know there are some at Mt vernon square, Reagan airport, Union Station? I have no knowledge of this just curious if that could even work as a cheaper solution.

Also if we are dreaming of express trains how about with the new silver line Arlington builds an express line down the median of 66 with a stop at Rosslyn, west falls church, and on out to tysons etc.

And finally any idea when the "virtual tunnel" to allow transfers between the Farraguts and Chinatown: Metro Center is going to happen? And how long a window are you going to have? 30mins?

by Chris R on Aug 10, 2009 11:34 am  (link)

Good post, Matt. As a point of clarification, the Green Line Commuter Shortcut (where trains going to/from Greenbelt utilized the connector track at Fort Totten to take the Green Line temporarily to Farragut North) only began in early 1997, so it was two years where riders would have used that service until the Mid-City Line opened. I think the proximity of Gallery Place to Farragut Square is a far more likely explanation for why Green Line riders would prefer the Red Line.

by Reza on Aug 10, 2009 11:55 am  (link)

Um, the preference for the Red line at Faraggut North to Green line is obvious. It's only two stops to Gallery Place, giving a net stop to L'Enfant at only four, compared to five for the same trip on Orange.

by Boots on Aug 10, 2009 12:00 pm  (link)

@Reza
Thanks for the clarification on the Green Line shortcut.

@Boots
It may be a combination of factors. I won't speculate on which exactly. However, you are correct that for commuters bound for Greenbelt, the savings is indeed great. However, for commuters bound for Branch Avenue, the savings is not as dramatic. At the same time, a transfer at L'Enfant is likely less crowded than one at Metro Center. Still, riders prefer the Red Line.

Since we don't know where riders are coming from, someone could easily be walking past Farragut West on their way to Farragut North. If that is the case, we are really seeing a clear preference for the Red Line.

Or it could be that more jobs are concentrated around Farragut North as compared to Farragut West. If that's the case, someone would travel to the nearest station unless they wanted to minimize transfers, in which case, they might consider walking a bit further (to Farragut West).

by Matt Johnson on Aug 10, 2009 1:25 pm  (link)

How about Union Station (and L'Enfant)? Interesting locations because of the commuter rail service.

by egk on Aug 10, 2009 1:33 pm  (link)

It is possible to have express trains within the current system without building an additional line: you only need a "passing lane" at certain points. Alternatively, by timing the trains: for example, at Silver spring stop you could let the train coming from the North become an express to Ft Totten then Union station. The next train would start at Silver Spring (its a turn around spot) and stop at every station. I calculated a few years ago that you could do it for Silver Spring to Union station merely by timing. At rush hour more than half the travel time seems to be devoted to accel/decelerating to stops, and waiting at those stops.

As for an additional line: to be honest the system needs at least another track in the downtown sections.

by SJE on Aug 10, 2009 1:49 pm  (link)

As for extending metro further out instead of widening what we have: this is merely a recipe for more problems, as all those people coming from further out will be adding to an already jammed system downtown. The downtown section is so bad that I gave up and ride my bike most days, else I drive

by SJE on Aug 10, 2009 1:52 pm  (link)

What days is this data for is this just for monday thru friday rush hour or is this data based on average of travel at all times.

Do they have passenger flow for trips that occur during,

shopping seasons (dec 24,26, day after thanksgiving, day before mothers/fathers day)

school ( including, elementary-high school and college) compared to when schools are out.

major holidays

etc. each of those also has a effect on the amount of passengers per any specific day and time especially for stations near colleges and schools which the amount of passengers lower when school/college is out.

by kk on Aug 10, 2009 2:47 pm  (link)

@kk
The data shown here is the total number of trips taken on an average weekday. The survey of riders took place in May 2007.

Each of these specific maps shows the average number of trips made per weekday (in May 2007) originating at the given station.

I do not know what other data WMATA has, but I do not have access to that data.

That said, the ridership survey, which I used to create these maps, is very detailed, including the mode people used to get to/from the station, among other things. I doubt WMATA has collected that level of detail for specific days of the year.

by Matt Johnson on Aug 10, 2009 2:54 pm  (link)

Matt,
Believe me WMATA has detailed data on entries and exits at every station in the system at various times of the day. The database contains station of entry, time of entry, station of exit and time of exit. They use the same statistics to compile the daily system ridership.

by Sand Box John on Aug 10, 2009 11:49 pm  (link)

My preference for the Red Line toward Fort Totten is simple: the line is aboveground for most of the way north of Union Station. I like watching the scenery go past.

That's one of the really enjoyable things about Chicago's L. It's also why I don't think the Silver Line's aerial structure through Tysons Corner will be as bad as everyone thinks it will be.

by Dustin on Aug 11, 2009 7:42 am  (link)

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.

Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)

or see below to post

To post your comment, please enter the two words in the box below to prevent spam:

Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time