Transit
London's spider maps
Transport for London has these great bus maps that show routes traveling in all directions from major transit nodes.
These maps, known as "spider maps," are more abstract than the station-oriented bus maps Metro posts in stations and recently put online. They combine several useful features:
- A local area walking map, showing the location of the different bus stops keyed to a table of routes;
- A schematic route map for the bus, showing routing to other transit nodes in the area;
- A table of routes leaving from that node, either daytime or nighttime routes.
These maps, Metro's station area maps, Los Angeles Metro's "12 Minute" maps (discussed here), and improved bus schedules are all created by CHK America, Inc.
There are some challenges with this mapping method:
- You have to name the "dots". Could DC residents agree on what to call the many new places we'd have to represent as a dot on a map? Or would the dot names become conglomerations, like some Metro station names? Bus stops do have names today, typically the name of the cross street, so perhaps those could suffice.
- Our bus service seems more complicated. Some routes only travel certain times or have "turn-back" service. For example, there are some Metrobus routes that operate only two or three trips a day. Is it better or worse to put them on the map?
- Our buses are not as frequent as London's. This kind of map is most useful if the rider only has to worry about routing and not schedule. Once a rider has to worry about bus schedule and timetables, it's likely this won't be enough information. Perhaps the line widths could vary to convey frequency information.
Despite these challanges, spider maps make it very easy for someone to easily find the bus line to get from a station to any destination. Maps like these could be very valuable in the Washington region, as they are in London.
Comments
Successful speed cameras require fair speed limits
- Successful speed cameras require fair speed limits
- Amid scandal, don't lose sight of Gray's policy achievements
- VDOT ignores own data, pushes widening I-66
- Montgomery plans 160-mile, "gold standard" BRT system
- DC's divide need not be black and white
- Preservationists ask to shrink 3rd Church replacement
- Planners are the new public health officials
Wed May 23
12:00 pm Live chat with Matt Yglesias
Thu May 24
6:30 pm M Street SE/SW public meeting
Wed May 30
10:00 am Bike-ped safety enforcement hearing
Mon Jun 4








by Chris Loos on Sep 25, 2009 2:15 pm
2) London buses aren't all frequent. And short turns exist too. If you look at the Croydon spider map, you'll see how the 166, which runs 3bph to Banstead and 1bph beyond, is treated. Unfortunately, there isn't very much consistency: the Chessington map doesn't give any indication that the 467 also runs hourly and stops before 7pm.
3) But at least joke (sorry, "mobility") routes like the 931 (which runs one bus per week between Crystal Palace and Lewisham, duplicating sections of other routes) don't make it onto any spider maps, and seem to be dying (the 962, arguably the most pointless of the lot, seems to have vanished). There really comes a point where some form of transport-on-demand makes sense...
by James D on Sep 25, 2009 10:26 pm
by Reza on Sep 26, 2009 4:27 am
To your 'naming the dots' point-- the 'dots' on this map are only the big bus stops (ie, interchanges with subway or rail stations-- thus pre-named).
by skiddie on Sep 26, 2009 5:21 am
by LM on Sep 27, 2009 4:50 am
by Chris Loos on Sep 27, 2009 9:52 am
Add a Comment