Transit
NextBus a big success for Metro
Metro has delivered a quality benefit to riders with NextBus. If it's not a home run, it's at least a triple.
From my own experience and anecdotal evidence from others, if NextBus says a bus is coming at a certain time, it's almost always there right then or a minute or two later. That's a very valuable service.For example, I recently used it for a bus that runs only every 30 minutes middays and stops a block and a half from my house. Normally, I'd avoid this bus, or plan for a 10-20 minute wait at the bus stop. Instead, I monitored the prediction, then kept working until almost the exact moment I had to leave. Then I started running a bit late, so I knew to run to the bus. Sure enough, the bus pulled up just moments after I reached the stop.
NextBus's one significant flaw is the buses that don't appear, either because the operator didn't activate the transponder or because it's broken. In those cases, a bus rider might decide to walk across the street to buy a sandwich only to see a bus glide past from the windows of the store. Metro has been training drivers to activate the system, and anecdotally, these occurrences seem to have declined.
According to a Metro presentation for this Thursday's Board meeting, the Web site got 152,881 uses in July and 143,052 in August. The phone system's usage rose in August (from 69,242 calls to 87,197 calls) despite the traditionally slow month, probably because Metro rolled out more signs on more stops. Metro will continue to deal with vandalized signs and replace broken radios. They also plan some customized management tools for them to analyze bus performance using the data, and will "consolidate the bus stop data base," though it's not clear what that means.
Metro only received 136 complaints in July and August. That's great, and it's a fine system. However, they use a very misleading pie chart comparing the numbers of complaints with the total number of people using the system, which gives the impression that every person who didn't complain must have liked their experience. That's obviously not true, even if the vast majority have been happy, as they probably were.I'd encourage the Board to ask two questions:
What percentage of buses don't appear on NextBus? If an operator forgets to turn the transponder on, the bus doesn't show up in the system. Likewise, if the transponder is broken, it doesn't appear. According to the presentation, it appears Metro ran some QA on this. What did they find? What percentage of operators aren't turning it on, and what percentage are broken? Do they have a target standard for this? How quickly are broken transponders being replaced? How quickly does Metro find out that they're broken?
Can other application developers get the position data? Tom Lee, for example, wanted to try developing an application using the position information. However, Metro doesn't make it accessible via an API the way CTA does. Further, there's some ambiguity about whether Metro, NextBus, or NextBus's licensee "NextBus Information Systems," which developed the iPhone app, owns the rights to the location data. Can Metro clarify the legal status of this data? Are there any plans to create an API so that those interested in building other types of applications can use the same raw data that NextBus gets from Metro?
Comments
- Successful speed cameras require fair speed limits
- Amid scandal, don't lose sight of Gray's policy achievements
- VDOT ignores own data, pushes widening I-66
- Montgomery plans 160-mile, "gold standard" BRT system
- DC's divide need not be black and white
- Preservationists ask to shrink 3rd Church replacement
- Planners are the new public health officials








Still, that is vastly better than no information at all.
by BeyondDC on Sep 21, 2009 12:27 pm
by цarьchitect on Sep 21, 2009 12:32 pm
by Joey on Sep 21, 2009 12:39 pm
by ogden on Sep 21, 2009 12:44 pm
by Taeyoung on Sep 21, 2009 12:58 pm
It's also allowed me at least once to take the bus home from the supermarket; usually, I pay for a taxi because I don't want to walk from Metrorail with groceries and don't know how long I'll have to wait around for a bus. Saving just one taxi fare offsets the $3 or $4 I paid for the application.
by Josh B on Sep 21, 2009 1:10 pm
by Nate on Sep 21, 2009 1:20 pm
The iPhone app is the best way to access it I think. Although I have had good experience just bookmarking each stop too.
I ultimately hope that WMATA and the public can use the data to better analyze on-time performance and get a better handle on the bunching problem.
by Reid on Sep 21, 2009 1:29 pm
by Patrick O'Malley on Sep 21, 2009 1:43 pm
The ghost buses thing can be annoying. I noticed the other day there was no prediction for a bus at the beginning of its route -- has anyone else tried this?
When NextBus has no prediction but I know there should be a bus, I check the schedule. It'd be useful to link the next scheduled departures directly from the NextBus page.
Also, I've bookmarked some pages on the mobile site -- then later, those bookmarks didn't work. I don't know what I'm doing wrong.
Is there an SMS-based system? For instance, "text us the stop # and we'll reply with the prediction"? This would be useful for people who can text but don't have mobile Web service (and might be easier/cheaper than calling the voice system).
by Gavin Baker on Sep 21, 2009 1:49 pm
by TransitNut on Sep 21, 2009 2:01 pm
by Joey on Sep 21, 2009 2:08 pm
I wonder whether the cost for SMS is greater or less than the cost for the voice system.
by Gavin Baker on Sep 21, 2009 2:26 pm
Here's a link to the instructions.
by Pat O on Sep 21, 2009 2:30 pm
by Tom A. on Sep 21, 2009 2:31 pm
I'd say that my use has gone from about 10 rides/month to perhaps 30. I think my bus, the D6, is now busier, especially with white-collar types, who are likely to carry smartphones.
I think NextBus justifies my iPhone. The occasional ghost bus is my only complaint.
by HM on Sep 21, 2009 3:13 pm
by DC_Chica on Sep 21, 2009 3:25 pm
On the subject of more displays:
1. I think WMATA has to try harder to get information to those who don't have smartphones. I don't think very highly of the automated phone response system. I think more bus-stands should have displays. I believe some of the BIDs have contributed to the upkeep of stands in the city. Some kind of standardized install with a price-tag might have some consider an upgrade.
2. In my home, I'd like to use one of those digital photo display devices without having to write my own screen-scraper. This is clearly a licensing issue. WMATA and NextBus just have to give it up on this one. From there, an $80 frame plus a service like http://framechannel.com gets you to a private in-home display. For bus-nerd cred, add a shelter.
3. We need more displays in public places. Why wouldn't every one of those unique but off-the-metro-grid places on H Street NE not have such a display letting people know when the next X2 is coming through? Why wouldn't you have a monitor in the foyers of buildings downtown doing the same.
Free the data. Add displays everywhere.
by HM on Sep 21, 2009 3:37 pm
by Michael Perkins on Sep 21, 2009 3:56 pm
1)Sometimes the signs bearing the code are vandalized (as the one for the northbound 90s was at 8th & G SE last week when I was there), and there's no easy way by phone to get the information based just on your location.
2) The phone interface should offer an option to key in the information. SMS as some others above suggest would also be fine. I might be the only one who gets self conscious about talking to a distant robot in a crisp, loud, staccato at the bus stop, but I doubt it. Maybe the voice-only approach is intended as a "heads-up" idea that's supposed to keep users from having to look down from their surroundings and potentially put themselves at risk where they wait for the bus, but I really don't think punching the numbers would make a significant difference in that regard.
by Lucre on Sep 21, 2009 4:29 pm
Besides that and the issue of ghost busses, I've very glad the system is in operation.
by dh on Sep 21, 2009 4:32 pm
by David C on Sep 21, 2009 6:06 pm
My biggest problems that I'd like to see addressed are:
1. I too experience the ghost bus effect, especially at the end of the line. I'll often check NextBus at McPherson Square, where a number of bus lines begin and end. I notice several buses just sitting there that do not appear on the app.
2. The phone system is annoying. It lists the times and bus routes in order, as opposed to saying what's coming first. If I'm at 16th and Irving going south at 10:30, I don't need to know that there's an S2 coming at 10:45 and 11:08, and an S4 coming at 10:37 and 10:58. Just tell me that the S4 will be there in 7 minutes.
by Adam L on Sep 21, 2009 6:48 pm
There is a transportation axiom that holds true here. People are less upset about delays if they have access to information.
by beatbox on Sep 21, 2009 8:51 pm
It's amazing though how one bus not having the GPS turned on can render the whole thing useless.
Next bus is no substitute for the buses running on time, and I hope for the senior citizens and others who don't have digital technology, improvements continue aggressively.
(I don't know what PARP or ghost buses are.)
by Jazzy on Sep 21, 2009 8:55 pm
I was North Capitol & I street and was trying to get info on an 80 going toward Fort Totten it gave me info on the bus going toward Kennedy Center and i just decided to hear all buses coming soon it gave me the X2 to Lafayette Square, 96 Capitol Heights and 80 Kennedy Center it seems like some of the id's should be across the street and over a block
On any bus stop that serves more than 3 buses it does not work I have gotten bus does not stop here many times when it clearly does and it says it on the stop.
by kk on Sep 21, 2009 10:51 pm
by Tony on Sep 22, 2009 11:47 am
by Mike B on Sep 22, 2009 12:50 pm
Also, I just tried the texting mentioned above. Texting is much cheaper and easier for me than the speech "recognition" hotline. One nitpick though: it won't just list all the buses coming to the bus stop, but forces you to choose one and then go through everything to choose another. (I don't care which 2 series bus is coming to the bus stop because they all go to the metro station - I just want the one soonest.) I realize they have limited space, but more than half the text is devoted to an advert, plus they could just span messages.
by James M on Sep 22, 2009 1:51 pm
r=G8 Rhode Island Ave
S=17th NW (Est) + I NW
d=Est->Avndle
9&39min
s=I NW + 17th NW (W)
d=Wst->Frrgt Sqre 7&37min
I don't really need the "Rhode Island Ave" title that metro gives the route, since it doesn't really provide useful information to me standing at the bus stop. I only need to know the route (G8) and which direction (Avondale or Farragut Sq)
by Pat O on Sep 22, 2009 2:18 pm
by Stacy on Sep 22, 2009 11:24 pm
Add a Comment