Greater Greater Washington

Development


Bulova: Tysons $15 billion is false

Fairfax County Chairman Sharon Bulova has published a rebuttal to last week's Post story claiming that the proposed Tysons Corner development will demand $15 billion in extra infrastructure investment. As we reported, that figure includes plenty of infrastructure unrelated or at best peripherally related to Tysons. Bulova writes:

An article in The Washington Post on Friday, October 30, 2009, "Tysons will need $15 billion'with a B'" gives the impression that the costs for "Transforming Tysons" will break the bank and makes the changes unwise. Neither is true and it's important to put the order of magnitude cost estimates as presented by County staff last week, in context.


Photo by wyfurasko.

Starting with the $14.8 billion figure in staff's charts for "Projects Serving Tysons 2010 - 2030 and 2030 - 2050." Of this:

  • $5.5 billion is for the Dulles Metrorail Silver line capital costs ($5.2 B), funding for which is already accounted for through tolls, federal funding, and special tax districts for commercial land owners in the area. Operating costs are estimated at ($0.3 B) over 40 years.
  • $5.4 billion is for the future westward extension of the I-66 Metrorail line. Also included in this figure is an estimate for another Metrorail or other high capacity transit system extension in the County (location not yet identified). This figure includes estimates for commuter parking facilities outside of Tysons, and express bus service on the Beltway HOT lanes, I-66, and other major corridors, some of which will carry passengers to Tysons.
  • $1.2 billion is for the proposed grid of streets within Tysons, including the costs of land. These costs will be captured in large part as development occurs.
Which leaves:

$2.7 billion in estimated transit and roadway capital and operating costs associated with the Tysons Plan over a 40-year period of time.

The Tysons Plan is a 40-year Plan. While $2.7 billion over the next 40 years sounds like a large number, it breaks down to $67 million per year. This figure includes operational costs for enhanced bus service and a new circulator in Tysons, some of which will be paid in fares by riders.

Our region has grown and prospered over the past 40 years. We will continue to grow during the next 40 years. Some of that growth will be in Fairfax County.

When we look back forty years to 1969, Fairfax County had a population of roughly 500,000 people. Since that time, working with the state, the federal governments and landowners, we have made transportation improvements to support our growing population:

  • building the entire regional Metrorail system including the extensions to Franconia-Springfield, Huntington, and Vienna in Fairfax County,
  • implementing the Fairfax Connector bus service,
  • widening the Capital Beltway, I-66, and I-95 multiple times,
  • building the Dulles Toll Road, the Fairfax County Parkway, the Springfield Mixing Bowl, and
  • countless other roadway widening, intersection, and grade-separated interchange improvements.
Today with a population of nearly 1.2 million, we are planning ahead for how we will accommodate our future growth in a way that addresses the challenges our past growth patterns have presented us with. What is particularly important about the Tysons Vision is that growth is oriented around mass transit and represents a shift in our planning paradigm. Tysons will be an urban growth center created to be less reliant on the automobile. It will provide people with multiple transportation options. The plan proposed by County staff calls for reducing car trips in and out of Tysons by 65%.

More urban mixed use transit-oriented land-use patterns, in addition to our single family subdivisions, will provide County residents with a diversity of life style choices at all stages in life. By offering more transit-oriented urban-style communities as we prepare for our future growth, we will be able to better address the transportation and environmental challenges that plague us today.

David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington and Greater Greater Education. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater. 

Comments

Add a comment »

Where did she publish this? There's no link.

by Joey on Nov 4, 2009 3:25 pm • linkreport

Whatever the real costs of the improvements, if they'd planned this area intelligently in the first place, they wouldn't be in this mess. If one where to plan intelligently though, you'd get the same old claptrap of the "socialist" government picking winners instead of the market. Now who's picking winners? But as Winston Churchill once said (I think) you can always count on Americans to do the right thing once they've tried everything else.

by Thayer-D on Nov 4, 2009 4:00 pm • linkreport

Joey: It was emailed out. Two people forwarded it to me. I just found it online here.

by David Alpert on Nov 4, 2009 4:34 pm • linkreport

I don't blame Fairfax planners *too* much for what Tysons became. As recently as the mid 1970s, they never foresaw that Tysons would become the development center it is now, which is the primary reason the Orange Line followed I-66 and not the Dulles Access Road in the first place.

To the best of my knowledge, Tysons was never really master-planned in the first place. It was more a series of individual spot rezonings, within the county-wide suburban (large setbacks, parking minimums, etc.) framework.

By the time it was clear the area was to be reckoned with, the major central nodes (which would have been more conducive to centralized planning with walkable features) had already been fully built out, with new development at the fringes (across the Beltway by Capital One, west along Route 7 past 123, etc.)

by Joey on Nov 4, 2009 4:40 pm • linkreport

Sharon Bulova's real estate development campaign contributions for the Fairfax County Chairman's election. Amount Donor
$6,000 Aaron J Georgelas
$2,000 Richard W Hausler
$1,250 Richard H Edson
$1,000 Searcy J Baker
$1,000 Mark Clarence Lowham
$1,000 Molly C Lynch
$1,000 Thomas F Nicholson
$500 Christopher A Brigham
$500 James C Cleveland
$500 Vickie Georgelas
$500 Anthony Georgelas
$500 Theodore J Georgelas
$500 Brenda Krieger
$500 Potomac Investors LLC
$500 T-Rex Investment Management LLC
$500 Maria Tanenbaum
$500 John C Ulfelder
$250 James H Edmondson, Jr
$150 Kahan Singh Dhillon, Jr

A few Tysons connections.

by Tysons Realist on Nov 4, 2009 5:38 pm • linkreport

@Joey

It was in an email blast Bulova sends out weekly. If you want to subscribe you can email Chairman@fairfaxcounty.gov, but for the most part its pretty dull reading of interest to local political junkies.

by Joshua Davis on Nov 4, 2009 6:23 pm • linkreport

@Tysons Realist

And what do those numbers have to do with the article? Is it some sort of large conspiracy that private people who also own business donate money to politicians that must plan where new infrastructure has to go? Unless these people are getting special infrastructure I don't see a problem.

by Joshua Davis on Nov 4, 2009 6:26 pm • linkreport

The "Vision" for Tysons Corner is premised on some well-connected landowners at Tysons obtaining more density, while foisting the costs for infrastructure on everyone else. That would occur in two ways: 1) pushing costs into other taxpayers; and 2) building without adequate public facilities, such that the quality of life continues to deteriorate.

The Tysons landowners successfully capped their contribution to Dulles Rail at $400 million, while dumping most of the rest of the costs on Dulles Toll Road users, who will see no measurable improvement in traffic congestion.

The transportation cost figures from the County Staff put mega-density at risk. The average county resident or small business operator is not likely ready to pay the high taxes to build this infrastructure. So the politicians, Connolly, Bulova, et al., are rallying around the landowners to try to discredit or minimize the costs.

This is but one more effort to screw the residents of Fairfax County.

by Tysons Realist on Nov 4, 2009 6:42 pm • linkreport

@Tysons Realist

What do those numbers have to do with the article? You are extremely naive if you think that politicians can be swayed by $500 donations, but if you really DO think it is that easy and dare I say affordable... get out your checkbook!

by Chris K on Nov 4, 2009 10:19 pm • linkreport

Tysons Realists numbers do mean something. But that is only half the story of course. What happened and continues to happen behind the scenes is the really meaty stuff. I have dedicated fully the past 3 years of my life to the TysonsTunnel.org project. I've worked on Capitol Hill, in various campaigns, and for law/lobby shops in my past. In one shop, my desk was just around the corner from disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Trust me, I've seen a lot - but nothing compares to what I saw happening behind the scenes with the "Dulles Rail" project. You should have a couple of us from the TysonsTunnel.org organization (now merely a watchdog organization) guest blog and give you some juicy tidbits. We don't have to try and play nice on the playground anymore since the project seems to be going forward in the way we most feared it would. Sad that all but a couple of elected officials were deliberately making decisions that were most harmful by any measure.

by Tatyana Schum on Nov 5, 2009 1:03 am • linkreport

The Washington Metropolitan Region will continue to grow significantly in coming decades, and we have an opportunity to change our patterns of growth and development in ways which improve not only the quality of life for our citizens, but also the quality of our global environment. Tysons must be planned to accomodate a balanced mix of walkable, residential and commercial uses which will allow people to live close to where they work and be less dependent on their cars. Couple that with a new generation of buildings which are energy efficient, utilize renewable energy systems and built with sustainable materials and we have the beginning of a working definition of what "sustainability" really means. Will it require significant investments by both the public and private sectors? Absolutely.

by Mark Lowham on Nov 5, 2009 10:42 am • linkreport

@Tatyana - I thought the objective of Tysons Tunnel was to build a more expensive version of the Silver Line. Please clarify.

by Ben Ross on Nov 5, 2009 11:00 am • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or