Development
Four visions of Wheaton, from new paint to tabula rasa
In 2004, Montgomery County followed up their 2001 Visual Preference Survey of Wheaton with a charrette, or design workshop, to turn residents' suggestions into a vision for the community.
The county teamed up with the National Main Street Center, Baltimore-based architecture firm Allison Platt & Associates, and staff from the Planning Department to develop four concepts for how Wheaton's downtown could be redeveloped.
Like last summer's charrette in Burtonsville, the charrette resulted in four scenarios (outlined in this PowerPoint presentation) for Wheaton's CBD.
The four, entitled "Fixer Uppper," "Entertainment District," "Residential Village," and "Office Town Center," ranged from making minor cosmetic changes to basically leveling the downtown core and starting over again. Nonetheless, all four proposals shared a few common elements, including:
- Turning all or part of Parking Lot 13, located at Grandview Avenue and Reedie Drive, into a public green.
- Streetscape improvements, especially along Georgia, Veirs Mill and University, including wider sidewalks, trees, and additional landscaping.
- Re-routing Ennalls Avenue between Grandview and Georgia to improve traffic circulation and create more regularly-shaped blocks for easier redevelopment.
- Visually and physically connecting "Wheaton Plaza" (the plan pre-dates the mall's purchase and renaming by Westfield) to the rest of the CBD to encourage shoppers to circulate between downtown and the mall.
The "Fixer Upper" scenario sought to retain Wheaton's "eclectic image," focusing on existing businesses and making "small scale improvements." Surface parking would be added throughout the downtown, though some vacant lots could be used for infill development. Lot 13 would still be used for parking, but a site plan suggests using special pavers that could allow it to double as a plaza on special occasions. The strip malls along Georgia Avenue, shown above, would receive new façades but little else.
The "Entertainment District" scenario recasts Wheaton as a "center for music entertainment, equipment and production," building on the renown of Chuck Levin's Washington Music Center on Veirs Mill Road. Space would be set aside for recording studios and artist housing. A cluster of night clubs would be created. Much of the downtown core would be leveled; Lot 13 would be completely closed to auto traffic and turned into an outdoor performance hall, shown above.
The "Residential Village" scenario seeks to form Wheaton as a neighborhood center, not a regional destination. Vacant properties would be developed as townhomes and mid-rise apartments or condominiums. Retail would be mainly local-serving, like supermarkets, though this scheme still proposes redeveloping the strip mall between Georgia and Triangle Lane, shown above. Lot 13 would become a leafy "village green" with a civic building and a playground.
The "Office Town Center" scenario focuses on bringing jobs to Wheaton, clustering office uses around the Metro station. High-rise buildings would be encouraged along Georgia Avenue at Reedie Drive, shown above, and a site plan proposes razing all of the Downtown core for parking garages and new buildings. Big-box stores would be built around Wheaton Plaza Westfield Wheaton mall. Of the four proposals, this seems to provide the least amount of open space, turning only part of Lot 13 into a plaza.
None of these four scenarios could really "fix" Wheaton by themselves, but each contains smaller ideas that can and will be combined to create a solid revitalization plan. While some proposals seem pretty outrageous Some of the things first outlined in the charrette, like the walkway connecting Georgia Avenue and Triangle Lane, have already been done. Others, like expanding Wheaton Plaza, happened in ways not anticipated by these plans. But they did represent yet another step in the decades-long push to revitalize Downtown Wheaton, one that would eventually culminate in the Wheaton CBD Sector Plan that we'll see early next year.
Visit the Mid-County Regional Services Center's website (and scroll all the way down) to see this and other documents on the Wheaton revitalization.
Comments
- Cyclists are special and do have their own rules
- M Street cycle track keeps improving, draws church anger
- O'Malley announces first projects using new gas tax money
- Can Loudoun grow while protecting its rural areas?
- Silver Spring mall could get massive facelift, new name
- ICC losing bus service in classic bait and switch
- Suitland Parkway Trail is a mess. Will leaders seek change?












by Redline SOS on Dec 16, 2009 1:32 pm • link • report
by IMGoph on Dec 16, 2009 11:45 pm • link • report
The reason it's not "Bethesda II" is the giant mall there, and the throngs of low rent paying new Americans living in Wheaton now. I don't think there are many low income people living within 2 blocks of the Bethesda metro station.
by Tom A. on Dec 17, 2009 8:52 am • link • report
by Mary on Dec 17, 2009 9:23 am • link • report
Veiled anti-immigrant prejudice aside, places change. On the one hand, people talk about gentrification and the problems it causes. Then on the other hand, some people say that "those people" make it impossible for a place to become better. Which is it?
You're right about the mall, though.
by David Alpert on Dec 17, 2009 9:24 am • link • report
The existing (1990) Sector Plan was an attempt to legislate keeping the small businesses intact through zoning. It was meant to preserve what was the status quo at the time. It is unironic that it contributed to Wheaton's decline. Wheaton only started coming back around 2003/4 when the mall was renovated and there was reinvestment in some of the small businesses.
The key to retaining the small businesses is to increase their customer base in walking distance. It is also essential to not knock down all the old buildings with lower rents. The key is infill and diversity of buildings, just like Jane Jacobs said in her classic Death and Life of American Cities.
Bethesda and Silver Spring both have mixed use zoning. We don't, at least until this new sector plan takes effect. We need to mix the old with the new. Basically redevelop any surface parking lots. The mall is now zoned TMX (I think that's the code) which is pure mixed-use transit-oriented development. I would love to see Westfield provide better pedestrian access and safety facilities. The mall doesn't have to be a barrier to Wheaton's future growth. With proper pedestrian access and integration, it could be symbiotic with the town.
by Cavan on Dec 17, 2009 10:06 am • link • report
by Cyrus on Dec 17, 2009 10:57 am • link • report
http://www.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=wheaton,+md&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=39.235538,46.142578&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Wheaton,+Montgomery,+Maryland&ll=39.038495,-77.050745&spn=0.004533,0.005633&z=17&layer=c&cbll=39.038571,-77.050781&panoid=v8K-NYjFJNtUlfUGDSEPOQ&cbp=12,118.12,,0,4.14
by NAB on Dec 17, 2009 11:15 am • link • report
JC Penny would have to be stupid as hell to do that a significant amount of mall shoppers enter through the JC Penny if they moved you can guarantee not as many would go to the store as do now just because of its location.
Unless the entrance to the mall was moved there any store would have to be damn stupid to move to that location the two best locations in there right now would have to be where Target & Macys plus stores along the path between them.
The portion where the Hechts was is always empty no one goes down that portion its basically a dead end; there are a few shops that get business but thats is because people already know they are there (Downtown Locker Room, Lids, Sports Zone)and new shoppers probably turn around when they see nothing at the end.
For the metro garage I'd say demolish it and create a underground parking lot for people who park there and use metro with the mall over top of most people going through there are going to the mall because they cant across the road like they use to because of obstacles and don't want to walk all the way to the traffic light so just put the mall across the street.
by kk on Dec 17, 2009 11:21 am • link • report
Also who owns the land JC Penny is on and where the Hechts used to be; if JC Penny owns its land you can forget it.
It would be like the Sears at the old Landover mall site, there still there but nothing else around it where the one of the main entrances was through the Sears because it was the closest entrance to the A12 bus which goes there.
by kk on Dec 17, 2009 11:24 am • link • report
Add a Comment