Greater Greater Washington

Public Spaces


Turn the Porter-Klingle interchange into a park

The Klingle Valley trail project is focusing on building a trail, but it's also a great opportunity to reexamine the giant interchange to nowhere in the middle of Rock Creek parkland.

This interchange is massively overbuilt today. It was designed to shuffle cars between Porter Street, Beach Drive, and the now-nonexistent Klingle Road to the west. From satellite photos, it looks like a giant gash in an otherwise leafy expanse of parkland:

Porter Street is the visible road from the northwest to the southeast, while Beach Drive just appears as a dark line through the trees. Where the access road intersects busy Beach Drive, there is just a basic T-junction. That road then continues to Porter, but instead of a similarly-sized T-junction, we have six large ramps and two underpasses.

The current plan has the trail using part of the southernmost roadway (marked in green above) until it joins the Rock Creek trail. The roadway will remain open to cars for drivers coming from the handful of houses to the west.

But since no through traffic continues to the west, we shouldn't need this whole mess. Beach Drive gets by with a much simpler intersection. Why not turn the intersection of Porter and the road to Beach Drive into a regular T-junction as well? It could look something like this:

The road and underpass along the south (in green) would become a bicycles and pedestrian path only. The road and underpass in the north could become two-way for the cars going to the few houses on Klingle. The road that intersects Porter is already two-way, and cars heading east on Porter already turn across the intersection at grade to get to it.

The only change to traffic would be to have cars from that road going to Porter eastbound also turn across the intersection instead of looping under and back around. A stoplight could regulate those turns. Since the bottleneck on Porter is currently at the stoplights on either end, the small amount of delay from this extra movement shouldn't reduce the overall capacity of Porter Street. DDOT should certainly check that, however.

This change turns a lot of the land into usable park space. An even better arrangement would be to move that street toward the north, near the northern underpass. That would free up even more contiguous parkland by making all traffic to and from Beach Drive and the Klingle houses use the northern edge of the clearing, reserving the rest for recreation.

David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington and Greater Greater Education. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater. 

Comments

Add a comment »

THANK you. The current setup makes it dangerous to get from the Rock Creek path back to Adams Mill Rd (You basically need to cross the off-ramp then cross over 4 lanes of Porter. Not fun to do with a bike or a dog).

by Aaron on Dec 21, 2009 2:45 pm • linkreport

You know, I haven't been following this development plan much, but after reading this post I'm suddenly reminded of a Regardie's article from the early 90's about Klingle plans and the local residents, chiefly TV shouting-head John McLaughlin. It's always those pesky "residents to the west on Klingle" that are screwing things.

by Lou on Dec 21, 2009 4:27 pm • linkreport

So let me get this straight...

~13 years ago the city, at great expense rebuilds this intersection to its current configuration to accommodate the volume of traffic that had been using, and at that point projected to use Klingle when it was reopened.

Now, you want to spend another ~million dollars digging up practically new roads and associated drainage systems and reconfiguring this intersection all to gain the equivalent of what... a quarter of an acre of green space back?

The largest argument that actually had traction, that the Sierra club and the half a dozen people who owned property adjacent to the road gave for not reopening Klingle was the cost involved. That the city was in no financial position to spend the money and it would be cheaper to just build the bike path.

Yet, we've seen since that to fulfill all basic requirements that the hiker/biker be built to accommodate emergency vehicles, and accommodate the existing sanitary and future storm drain systems, that the biker/hiker trail would be nearly as expensive as rebuilding the road. Now we want to eclipse the cost to rebuild the road by spending more money tearing out practically brand new and unused roadways built to accommodate the traffic from Klingle?

What is it folks? We either have the money or we don't.

by nookie on Dec 21, 2009 6:28 pm • linkreport

Alternatively, we could use this as a starting point to build a badly needed freeway down the center of DC. Better yet, we could make it a parkway like what exists on the other side of the Potomac ... where, bikers, hikers, drivers, everyone gets to share in the beauty of the land. Lots of freeways in California are built in similar watershed areas. It's a great way to extend the benefits of these national resources. After all, why shouldn't the latino cleaning woman driving from one job to another have just as much right to enjoy this natural resource as the yuppie with the spare time to go biking on weekends?

by Lance on Dec 21, 2009 8:54 pm • linkreport

Lance: I think you'll see the members of this forum support keeping the SE/SW freeway before you'd see them supporting such a freeway as you describe...

As for the intersection, an easier and cheaper option (especially since the District claims a budget deficit these days) would be to simply keep the existing underpasses and realign the ramp coming from westbound Porter into a 2-lane/2-way intersection...with or without a roundabout at Porter....when this topic got brought up earlier in the year, I suggested the roundabout, and I still am.

by Froggie on Dec 21, 2009 10:24 pm • linkreport

The people who live in Woodley have money and power. Kinda like reverse eminent domain or half a democracy.

by Thayer-D on Dec 22, 2009 7:13 am • linkreport

I began to use Klingle as a foot rte. from east-to-west immediately after Mayor Barry closed it - before the current "clover leaf" in the photo was built. The clover leaf is a huge detterent, a barrier, to foot and bikes getting across. It was much easier before it was built.

by Bianchi on Dec 22, 2009 11:54 am • linkreport

Or how about parking area so that people who don't live up the hill can come from throughout the area and enjoy the new hiker/biker/petwalking trail (when it's eventually built) that the folks off Klingle and Woodley Roads have managed to land for themselves.

by Doug on Dec 23, 2009 1:27 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or