Transit
The Transit Ombudsman: What's bothering you?
I'm not a doctor, or a therapist.
I'm just an activist, inspired by what our collective energy can achieve to help us get around the Greater Washington area efficiently and safely.
Today, I introduce The Transit Ombudsman: A series of posts on issues that bother riders, where I will contact Metro to seek solutions. I will focus only on issues that are good bets to produce successful results. I want your suggestions for what to work on.
In November, David wrote about Metro's underwhelming response to a customer's complaint over rock-throwing near at a rail station. After the post ran, top Metro staff took action to produce the kind of results that riders have a right to expect every day.
Many of us who strongly support transit genuinely want Metro to be more responsive to riders' needs and more accountable, too. It would make getting around easier. And by making transit a more attractive option, we will reduce traffic congestion, stress and pollution.
The higher the level of public confidence in Metro, the easier it will be to secure the funds needed to improve transit service. Metro really needs to recognize this dynamic.
There are many improvements needed at Metro. Many are complex or costly, or both. But they're not what the Transit Ombudsman will primarily focus on. Instead, I will focus on "low-hanging fruit," which WMATA Board member Chris Zimmerman and his aide Samantha Sissman know something about. They successfully pushed for installing handles below the top horizontal bars in rail cars to give short riders something to grab onto other than another rider's hair. (Note: I am 5'6½".)
Our first Transit Ombudsman topic will be Metro's online trip planner. To give Metro staff credit, it sure has improved a lot. But perfect, it's not.
Tell me and our readers Do you think adding a special link for riders to report problems with the trip planner would be a good way to improve it?
The goal of The Transit Ombudsman is to identify low-cost issues that are easier for us to get action on so we can strengthen Metro
Comments
- Successful speed cameras require fair speed limits
- Amid scandal, don't lose sight of Gray's policy achievements
- VDOT ignores own data, pushes widening I-66
- Montgomery plans 160-mile, "gold standard" BRT system
- DC's divide need not be black and white
- Preservationists ask to shrink 3rd Church replacement
- Planners are the new public health officials






Two weeks ago, same situation, Next Bus said twenty minutes, schedule said 25 minutes, and Trip Planner said take the bus. It was raining so I took the train, only to see the bus pull up from the train platform.
by Redline SOS on Jan 4, 2010 3:07 pm
There's also a lot of wasted time with the auto-voice unnecessarily talking in full sentences.
Another thing I haven't completely confirmed is that the telephone system sometimes repeats some bus times twice and skips every other bus. I'm fairly sure this happens because I see the busses on the online system at my desk, but they disappear when I'm using the phone while waiting for the bus.
I've directly contact wmata about the first complaint with no serious response.
by dh on Jan 4, 2010 3:07 pm
by dh on Jan 4, 2010 3:12 pm
by Michael Perkins on Jan 4, 2010 3:15 pm
@Michael Perkins - the trip planner and nextbus are not the easiest or fastest ways to navigate on a blackberry. not all of the features work, so i tend to switch between BB OS and Opera mini to get as much info as possible.
by Redline SOS on Jan 4, 2010 3:19 pm
re: TripPlanner - I wish that they would provide you with a search tool like kayak or farecast have for airfare so that you can easily hide certain results, specify which routes/transport methods you are interested in using, etc.
by grumpy on Jan 4, 2010 3:41 pm
To that end, I suggested in my submission that Trip Planner should have a small link or button at the bottom of each itinerary it returns which would allow users to flag it as incorrect, or even some sort of rating system like Amazon's comments or Yelp's reviews. The more data WMATA can aggregate about where trip planner is making mistakes the more easily it (or its contractor) can tweak the algorithms to account for them.
by Erik W on Jan 4, 2010 3:46 pm
basically, what I'm reading here is that WMATA needs to get the info into people's hands easily and efficiently. that and safety are really two areas that WMATA could improve with little to no cost, just a change in culture. here's hoping....
by dano on Jan 4, 2010 3:54 pm
by bryandc on Jan 4, 2010 3:56 pm
by Pat O on Jan 4, 2010 3:58 pm
http://www.wmata.com/rail/maps/find_station.cfm
so, is Trip Planner and Find A Station running on completely sets of data?
by bryandc on Jan 4, 2010 4:00 pm
Real-time and (almost real time) Google maps are available, you just have to get away from the WMATA website to find them. Change your bookmarks to use the NextBus website instead.
E.g. Here is the NextBus page for the S2 at 16th & U.
http://www.nextbus.com/predictor/prediction.shtml?a=wmata&r=S2&d=S2_S2_0&s=6867&ts=11820
Live Map (Java): http://www.nextbus.com/predictor/publicMap.shtml?a=wmata&r=S2
Google Map:
http://www.nextbus.com/googleMap/googleMap.jsp?a=wmata&r=S1&d=S1_S1v1_0&s=6867
I'm not sure why metro dumbed down the abilities of NextBus on their website, but they did.
Chris
by Chris on Jan 4, 2010 4:06 pm
by Adam F on Jan 4, 2010 4:29 pm
There has also got to be a way to allow browsers to auto-complete the fields with previously-used entries. Firefox can do this with many website fields, but not the trip planner. I'm guessing this has to do with the field properties in the page.
WMATA releasing the schedule data to Google would be the simplest way to solve the majority of these problems.
by Matthias on Jan 4, 2010 5:04 pm
by Pat O on Jan 4, 2010 5:06 pm
by nathaniel rein on Jan 4, 2010 5:12 pm
I just dead stop at that every time trying to think about what it DOES want from me.
by jane on Jan 4, 2010 5:47 pm
by SJE on Jan 4, 2010 8:06 pm
by James on Jan 4, 2010 8:30 pm
a) it should cost more for people without smarttrip cards (and maybe for people who do have them)
b) all fares should be in single-dollar increments: have you ever watched a group of tourists try to assemble $3.10 per person? Especially if they are unfamiliar with American currency? When the bus is already late and you have a plane to catch? I am one of the more committed transit-users I know and it makes me want to take a cab.
c) it needs to run more frequently. charging non smarttrip card users $5 a ride could help fund this. 40 minute headways are insane.
d) more luggage space would rock. Not much (transporting people has to come first) but a little.
e) the bus should pick up new riders at BWI when it drops folks off, allowing them to ride to the rail terminal and back around on the way to Greenbelt. The current way means that you have to stand there and freeze while the bus pulls away and picks you up a few minutes later.
by Stacy on Jan 4, 2010 10:53 pm
by Dan on Jan 4, 2010 10:54 pm
Also, in Next Bus 2.0, the system should know that on Saturday and Sunday only the L2 bus runs on Connecticut Ave. so it should be smart enough not to ask for which bus.
by Steve Strauss on Jan 4, 2010 10:57 pm
For now, I'm briefly responding to the above comments -- sorry for the long submission here!
@PatO and Dan -- Regarding text message-based trip planning, contact me at Dennis@GGWash.org?
@dh re: NextBus. The button option sounds real good. Anyone else's reaction? Thanks for mentioning NextBus' dependence on the transponder being set. DH, email me offline? Dennis@GGWash.org Steve Strauss, thanks for reinforcing the noise interference issue and mentioning weekend schedules.
@Michael Perkins: You're 100% on about importance of providing riders with StopID via trip planner and elsewhere, too, I'd add.
@Grumpy: You can select bus, rail or both. Any happier? ;-)
@Erik W: Contact me at Dennis@GGWash.org? I like the idea of adding a trip planner trouble button. How many riders "walk" away from their PCs irritated over a trip planner problem and they didn't see a convenient way to report it so Metro can keep its customers -- and potential supporters for more funding, eh? -- happy?
I'm obliged to point out: the customer service webform does indeed have a category for the website. It's the FOURTH drop-down menu! It's under, uh, "incident type." I don't quite understand the logic there. Internet... incident?
@Dano: Thanks for raising WMATA.com PDFs freezing up. Me too. Anyone else? Related to browser or ADOBE version?
@bryandc: If Metro does take you to South Africa, let me know -- even for four and a half bucks. Seriously -- The rail station finder isn't intended to provide you with the *address of a station. It's intended to provide you with the *name of a station **near an address ***you submit. I'll suggest that they change the wording to either "Find station nearby" or "Find station near this address."
To get the *address **of a station, go here:
http://wmata.com/rail/stations.cfm
@Adam F -- Right ON about adding Customer Service contact on website's mobile version! Sounds like an EZ fix to me.
@Mathias etal. -- Does anyone using trip planner experience it keeping starting/end points? I think different settings on privacy may allow -- or disallow this. For me, the front-page trip planner never remembers any data. The main trip planner page does -- on my roommate's computer. But on mine, using the same network, it remembers data only during the same browser session, until I exit and re-open.
A few years ago, I asked Metro to fix its default check box to remember your preferred maximum distance from a station/stop. It wasn't working after they gave us options for distance. They wound up eliminating the check box.
@Jane: Good point. I would propose these two changes: 1) Replace "Travel from location" with simply "From" and 2) Move to a more prominent place above the Address boxes in bold font, the text they do have lower on the page in almost greyed out text: "Enter address, intersection or landmark. Do not include city, state, zip code or any commas."
Chris, thanks for the mapology to help grumpy and all of us feel less grumpy!
@Stacy: Thanks for raising BWI bus frequency. Contact me offline? Dennis@GGWash.org
I think Metro is a great system -- sometimes. It sure can be greater. I want to see a Metro whose staff -- from top management through the rank-and-file -- *really honors its (semi-retired) slogan, "Metro Opens Doors." When Metro closes its doors to meaningful public involvement in its decisions, it frustrates riders to no end. That converts a naturally supportive constituency of hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of riders into being disinterested in working to strengthen Metro.
by Dennis Jaffe on Jan 5, 2010 2:44 am
by D on Jan 5, 2010 10:37 am
by Phil on Jan 5, 2010 12:01 pm
I finally bookmarked the NextBus web address in my Blackberry. But there again, it doesn't recognize a blackberry keypad. I have to scroll down the list of buses to get to mine (which is near the end of the list)
I love the service and use it regularly, especially on these very cold evenings. It's just an improvement Metro could make. After all, in DC, don't a lot of federal employees have Blackberrys?
by lou on Jan 5, 2010 1:00 pm
I have used it many times and after typing or saying the id I get info for the bus going the other way, while im at the correct stop.
by Kk on Jan 5, 2010 3:04 pm
by James on Jan 5, 2010 9:11 pm
by Joe Carbone on Jan 5, 2010 9:27 pm
Nat's response was that it's a driver training issue (transponder comments above) and that they're aiming for the 95% predictability mark.
My only reaction to this is that it's all very well to aim for 95% on-time arrivals, but NextBus is for the 5% (likely more) occasions when the bus isn't on schedule.
Further, if I could easily pull the data, I could write a script in an hour that'd show them all the missing buses during a day. This is a simple data tracking and analysis issue that they should be able to manage.
I thought NextBus was in 'beta' for years while they worked out the kinks. A non-trivial percentage of missing buses didn't show up on the 'must-fix' list.
As for what they can do, how about a 'report missing bus' button in the NextBus app? How about a button of some kind on the bus that I can hit if I know I'm on a bus not showing up on the system? Should I just inform the driver? Even a listing of scheduled v/s actual bus arrivals would easily show the ones that are off-line.
by HM on Jan 6, 2010 10:52 am
by Matthias on Jan 6, 2010 11:05 am
When I punch in the ID number for the bus stop, it says it doesn't recognize the ID number. My husband, who has a regular cell phone, doesn't have that problem.
by lou on Jan 6, 2010 11:16 am
Also, the system is confusing to first time users. The NextBus number listed on the bus stop is not identified as Metro's main number. So when you call and the voice says "say the service you need," my natural response was to say the name of the bus line. I had to go online to figure out what I was doing wrong.
by Erica on Jan 6, 2010 12:29 pm
@HM - Contact me at Dennis@GGWash.org? Thanks for your comments. Perhaps we may make an inquiry with the union -- where there is indeed an awareness that the more riders appreciate Metro's rank-and-file workforce, the more supportive the public will be of investing in transit.
@Mathias - Glad to hear! I have to learn whether adjusting one's browser's "privacy settings" has an impact here. I believe the trip planner retains info for me only until I exit the browser.
@Kk and Others - Anybody else have Kk's experience of receiving NextBus results for a bus going in the opposite direction?
@All re: NextBus and capability of submitting request via cell phone button. Um, I'm from Jersey. NextBus thinks I'm speaking some foreign language. Yeah, I like the button idea :-).
by Dennis Jaffe on Jan 6, 2010 1:17 pm
+1 to Stacy's suggestions for the B30 bus, I took it the day after Christmas and plan on avoiding it if possible in the future because of the overcrowded conditions.
@Chris - thanks for the tip - the maps are great!
@Kk - I've had that happen to me once but I can't remember the circumstances, does it mean that the sign was installed incorrectly? (switched with the one across the street it perhaps?)
by grumpy on Jan 6, 2010 6:18 pm
@ Erica: Metro fixed the confusion when you call for NextBus many months ago. Now one of the first things you hear is: “Say NextBus”
@Dennis: I was on the 2B this morning in Merrifield and the bus driver just pulled over and stopped for ten minutes without explanation. One of the riders asked several times what they delay was and he ignored her. By the time we go to Vienna Station, the train had just left. IÂ’ve seen this a few times lately and it irks me, because the busses are usually already late. IÂ’ve also noticed that more and more bus drivers seem to be intentionally driving slowly. The driver this morning was probably doing no more than 25 mile per hour on a long stretch of road where the speed limit is 40. This was in the middle of the day, so traffic was very light. More than once IÂ’ve missed a connection recently because of this. And it also causes problems for traffic behind the bus, because even when the bus is moving, everyone needs to go around it.
by James on Jan 6, 2010 8:34 pm
The L2 is great during rush hours, but seems to run on its own special schedule, irrelevant of what the timetables and NextBus say. At least 4 times in the past month, I've waited for a midday or evening L2. NextBus says the bus is coming in 10 or so minutes... I wait, and wait, and wait. Next Bus says the bus is 1 minute away, yet it never shows. Then it resets and says it's coming in another 40 minutes... or whenever the next scheduled bus is.
If the information WMATA displayed in the timetables and NextBus was actually accurate, this would make traveling much easier at no cost.
by Chris on Jan 7, 2010 12:25 pm
by James on Jan 7, 2010 7:52 pm
Make the data public, and let clever people create apps for Blackberrys and i-phones and etc.
I never, ever trust the Trip Planner for anything requiring a transfer (I'll usually trust it for a straight shot). Often I can find a better solution by slogging through the schedules and figuring it out on my own.
One of the beautiful things about Google Transit is that you can see the map to go along with the routing. Zoom in; zoom out; satellite view; street view; etc. That is very helpful, and a feature that I don't imagine is likely to be included in the Trip Planner anytime soon. Even if it were, Metro would have to spend money that would be better spent on other things than duplicating (inferiorly, if that's a word) what is already available through Google.
Re: NextBus. I've only used a few times, but in every case the printed schedule turned out to be more accurate. Once it cost me a missed bus (NextBus claimed it was running late, but it turned up on time while I was still 1/2 block away.)
by Steve O on Jan 8, 2010 11:37 pm
http://wmata.com/rider_tools/developer_resources.cfm
There are plenty of apps for iphone using GTFS, people should start making some android apps.
by Michael Perkins on Jan 8, 2010 11:47 pm
by jen k on Jan 19, 2010 3:36 pm
by Transit Happy on Jan 22, 2010 12:25 pm
Add a Comment