Transit
ACT creates Montgomery County transit vision
Last July, Montgomery County's Action Committee for Transit worked with Greater Greater Washington to produce a transit vision for the I-270 corridor. Rather than spending billions of dollars on widening I-270 as the State of Maryland proposes, ACT argued that it would be better and more affordable to invest in a vigorous integrated transit network.
That was all well and good, but why stop with the I-270 corridor? There's more to Montgomery County than Gaithersburg.
That in mind, ACT asked me to produce for them the following map, which expands their original 270 vision to encompass the entirety of Montgomery County.
- Extension of the Metrorail Red Line from Shady Grove north along I-370 and I-270 to MD Route 118, where it would end at Germantown Town Center. There would be one intermediate station at Quince Orchard Road, where the line crosses the CSX rail tracks.
- MARC improvements resulting in more frequent, all-day, bi-directional service to Frederick.
- A new spur of the MARC Martinsburg branch to reach Hagerstown.
- The completed Corridor Cities Transitway as light rail, with slight modifications to the route at Crown Farm and Kentlands, and a one-station extension to Clarksburg Town Center.
- The completed Purple Line, using the adopted Locally Preferred Alternative alignment.
- A new light rail line beginning at Silver Spring Metro and extending north along US-29 to Burtonsville.
- A new streetcar line beginning at White Flint Mall and running north along MD Route 355 through Rockville and Gaithersburg, ending at an expanded multi-modal Metropolitan Grove station.
- (Not shown on the map) Various bus priority and/or BRT improvements throughout the county, such as on Veirs Mill Road.
For more about their vision for Montgomery County, visit ACTfortransit.org.
Cross-posted at BeyondDC.
Comments
Cyclists are special and do have their own rules
- Cyclists are special and do have their own rules
- M Street cycle track keeps improving, draws church anger
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools
- O'Malley announces first projects using new gas tax money
- Metro policy for refunds after delays falls short, riders say
- ICC losing bus service in classic bait and switch
- WMATA launches "Short Trip" rail pass on SmarTrip
Tue May 21
Sun May 26
11:00 am Roosevelt Ride in Greenbelt
Sat Jun 1
10:00 am CSG walking tour of Wheaton







by Ben on Feb 16, 2010 11:32 am • link • report
The logic behind that it was that the right-of-way along Route 29 between Silver Spring and White Oak wasn't wide enough to accommodate light rail, while the ridership along New Hampshire Avenue (lined with apartment buildings and the FDA campus) may be higher. On the other hand, a destination like Downtown Silver Spring could generate higher ridership than Langley Park now or in the future.
by dan reed on Feb 16, 2010 11:52 am • link • report
Could a similar idea work to connect Olney to the Glenmont on the other end of the red line? To dramatically expand on the existing Y series of buses?
by Patrick on Feb 16, 2010 11:53 am • link • report
by dan reed on Feb 16, 2010 11:54 am • link • report
by JMG on Feb 16, 2010 11:54 am • link • report
by Scott on Feb 16, 2010 11:55 am • link • report
Does the ACT support growth in the corridor to accomodate this new infrastructure? This fantasy map is just more politics coming from the ACT coalition
by Cyrus on Feb 16, 2010 11:58 am • link • report
The best option in getting from Gaithersburg to southern Montgomery County and DC is the Metro.
by Cassidy on Feb 16, 2010 11:59 am • link • report
by Cyrus on Feb 16, 2010 12:01 pm • link • report
I think light rail up the 29 corridor is an excellent idea and is greatly needed. Eventualy it could expand to Columbia and would move traffic off 29 with is over crouded expesially during rush hour and away from the 4 corners intersection which is very unsafe at the moment.
I live on the 270 corridor but we at least have the redline they have nothing.
by Matt R on Feb 16, 2010 12:02 pm • link • report
by T. Aloisi on Feb 16, 2010 12:06 pm • link • report
Right now both MARC and Metro stop at Silver Spring, but getting between the stations is not easy. If we make it easier to get between MARC and Metro at Shady Grove, we link Gaithersburg to the metro and we also can use this connection to create some of the express trains that metro is lacking.
by nathaniel on Feb 16, 2010 12:06 pm • link • report
by Canaan on Feb 16, 2010 12:59 pm • link • report
@ nathaniel: Is it really necessary to have MARC stop at Shady Grove when it already stops at Rockville one stop to the south?
@ dan reed: Tell me Mayorga coffee could have been saved had there been an infill Metro station between Silver Spring and Takoma on the Red Line between Georgia and Burlington Aves. It'd be a good way to revitalize Silver Spring on Georgia south of the dark, dank Metro/MARC overpass.
And ACT: Before you give I-270 commuters all of the love, why not consider a two-station extension of the B route, with stops at Aspen Hill (Georgia @ Connecticut) and Norbeck (Georgia @ future ICC)? Let's have a little regional equity here!
by Reza on Feb 16, 2010 1:04 pm • link • report
by Redline SOS on Feb 16, 2010 1:27 pm • link • report
Without making more slices through Rock Creek park, there aren't easy answers, but the Purple line could be poised to also have more hubs to better connect it to N-S roads or diagonals along it's route. The purple line hubs are around 5 miles apart. Filling in a good network of potential transfers every 2.5 miles could make a big difference.
by Dan on Feb 16, 2010 1:31 pm • link • report
I guess having a Metro station at its front door would've helped bring customers to Mayorga. On the other hand, it might have driven up land values so a one-story furniture warehouse-turned-coffeehouse would've been even less viable on that property.
For lack of being any closer to Metro (the station's a half-mile walk away), we should focus on pedestrian improvements to make it easier, safer, and more pleasant to walk between Downtown and South Silver Spring. The Georgia Avenue streetcar, were it ever extended to Silver Spring, could have a stop in the neighborhood as well, around Burlington Ave.
This proposal definitely raises the question of the value of extending Metro. Do we extend the Red Line two or three stops to Germantown, or do we provide fixed-guideway service over a broader portion of the county? Given our limited funding, I'd probably pick the latter.
by dan reed on Feb 16, 2010 1:37 pm • link • report
by James on Feb 16, 2010 2:10 pm • link • report
The last thing the Red Line needs is to be lengthened. It is overcrowded enough as it is, and I don't know if a single pair of tracks can handle much more capacity. A single incident at one station impacts anyone riding the line, even if they aren't traveling anywhere close.
Where's an option for River Rd?
by Michael on Feb 16, 2010 6:02 pm • link • report
As far as im concerned everything north of 108 and east of Georgia Ave should leave and start there own county because Montgomery County doesn't give a damn about them.
by kk on Feb 16, 2010 6:41 pm • link • report
by Jen Mueller on Feb 17, 2010 6:45 am • link • report
by Jen Mueller on Feb 17, 2010 6:47 am • link • report
I don't know what races or income levels you're trying to point out by naming those places. I'm not familiar with them. What did you mean?
Thanks!
by James on Feb 17, 2010 9:23 am • link • report
by Scott on Feb 17, 2010 12:54 pm • link • report
by Adam on Feb 17, 2010 3:44 pm • link • report
by Cavan on Feb 17, 2010 4:14 pm • link • report
by chad on Feb 20, 2010 5:38 am • link • report
by David Alpert on Feb 20, 2010 9:11 am • link • report
The point about the Purple line west to NoVa is something that needs to be raised of course.
I agree about light rail, maybe, up Georgia and Colesville.
But there needs to be some better east west connections mid county probably?
cf my presentation to ACT a couple years ago:
http://www.slideshare.net/rllayman/montgomery-county-and-transit-revised-presentation?type=powerpoint
by Richard Layman on Feb 21, 2010 8:31 pm • link • report
As a MARC rider I confess that Chad's post was good for a giggle, because it shows how emotional this whole issue has become. And we shouldn't fault anyone for venting here -- better than doing in on the train/road in the final analysis.
Most other developed countries approach this issue with a variety of solutions. Light rail, urban rail, suburban rail, tram, bus, and on and on so that a robust fabric is created.
I'm not sure why Maryland is hooked on an all-or-nothing (untenable) solution to the issues facing one of the nation's most complex metro complexes.
Okay, yes, venting...
by Dean on Mar 9, 2010 7:56 pm • link • report
Add a Comment