Preservation
LeDroit "country house" could become 14 homes
A 19th-century country house at 1922 Third Street NW is one of the LeDroit Park's gems. It is about to receive some much needed attention.
At Thursday's ANC1B meeting, Community Three Development presented this concept to renovate the main house, to renovate the carriage house, and to build a new townhouse at the southern edge of the property.
The developer recently finished the swanky M Street Flats located in the Mount Vernon Triangle area. The group also completed The Nine on the 1300 block of Ninth Street, backing up to the historic Naylor Court. If these forerunners are any indication, 1922 Third Street may receive a high-end renovation.
The developer's design, in his words,
creates an addition to the existing main building that is smaller in scale and secondary to the main building, allowing the main structure to continue to read as the dominant form on the site. This addition terminates in a "carriage house court," designed to celebrate the existing carriage house, while maintaining the historic structure's existing view corridor from U Street. A new unsubdivided townhouse lot and structure is created to terminate the row of townhouses directly to the south of the site. The result of these interventions preserves and enhances the character and urban form associated with the main structure and corresponding carriage house.
Though Community Three will need the approval of the city's Historic Preservation Review Board for the overall project, they are not seek zoning variances.
The proposal calls for 14,000 gross square feet of space and features 14 residential units and four garage spaces— a mixture permitted by zoning. One of the units would be set aside for affordable housing.Here are some drawings and diagrams from the concept. Note that the developer proposes to add a new rowhouse on the south side of the property (middle of the first drawing below). Some residents have expressed concern that the proposed rowhouse is too tall. The developer states that the added height was the idea of the Historic Preservation Office (HPO), since end-unit rowhouses were traditionally built to be bigger and more prominent than the intervening units.

In the next drawing, the concept preserves the historic carriage house (on the right) and connects it with the main house with a new structure (middle) with a hipped roof that mimics the former and dormers that mimic the latter. Some residents also expressed concern that providing only four on-site parking spaces for 14 units would overwhelm the adjacent streets with additional parked cars. The developer said he proposed five spaces, but HPO suggested four, so as not to overwhelm the site. One ANC commissioner asked the developer what, other than providing less parking, would the developer do to discourage car ownership. The developer had no other plans, but said he would consider bike parking and car sharing.

With the new connecting building and rowhouse, the project will increase the building footprint on the lot.

The developer clearly put a lot of thought into the proposal and it will be interesting to see in the coming weeks what modifications will be made to the plan in light of community input and further HPO staff opinion. Some residents are surprised by the number of proposed units, while others want to see construction start tomorrow.
Renovating LeDroit Park's unique historic homes (unique to Washington, in fact) is nothing new. A few years ago a developer renovated another historic LeDroit property, the Italianate-styled Juniper, and many consider that renovation an exquisite achievement.
Comments
- Latest Metro map drafts add Anacostia parks and other tweaks
- Bikeshare is a gateway to private biking, not competition
- DC Council makes major policy changes overnight
- Short-term Washingtonians deserve a voice, too
- Parklets give every block a little park
- Public land deals have both benefits and pitfalls
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools










by Adam L on Mar 8, 2010 10:24 am • link • report
I forgot to mention that the interior was stripped of its original features decades ago when it was turned into a rooming house. All that's left is moldy drywall. Even still, the exterior is historically significant, having changed little over the past 130 years. The main house and the carriage house were cataloged by the Historic American Building Survey in the 1970s.
Also, I live without a car in LeDroit Park and find the transit options pretty good. However, I can see why residents in the area might want one anyway.
by Eric F. on Mar 8, 2010 10:45 am • link • report
by Thayer-D on Mar 8, 2010 11:39 am • link • report
2.) I have to imagine that putting units here is a great place for people who work at Howard (and the hospital) to live. That doesn't require any transit since it's just a short walk.
3.) As mentioned above, the house is beautiful, but there's nothing there at the moment.
by Matt on Mar 8, 2010 11:42 am • link • report
Alsol, it's exactly 1/2 mile to the 7th st entrance of Shaw metro, and there's plenty of buses on Rhode Island. There's plenty of transit in the area already, and there's a plan for a streetcar line on Rhode Island.
by jcm on Mar 8, 2010 12:19 pm • link • report
Re. the transportation issue - I live one block east of this building, and I take only public transportation. The Shaw metro is about ten minutes walk - and there is a bus line that runs right in front of this house that goes down 3rd Street and all the way across P to Georgetown (via Logan and Dupont). There are numerous buses on Florida and New Jersey. The red line is not too far a walk in the other direction. (And don't forget the streetcars...)
by Kevin on Mar 8, 2010 12:50 pm • link • report
by Matthias on Mar 8, 2010 1:37 pm • link • report
by rg on Mar 8, 2010 2:00 pm • link • report
by Lance on Mar 8, 2010 3:37 pm • link • report
by Lance on Mar 8, 2010 3:41 pm • link • report
That is a question worthy of debate.
by Eric F. on Mar 8, 2010 3:51 pm • link • report
And incidentally, while they may not need a variance, they're going to need a use change from what is in the tax records (special purpose). I wonder if that is an automatic kind of thing ... or not.
by Lance on Mar 8, 2010 4:20 pm • link • report
by rg on Mar 8, 2010 5:38 pm • link • report
Add a Comment