Architecture
Gehry Eisenhower memorial actually not daring enough?
Earlier this morning I contributed to a group post about the proposed Eisenhower Memorial, designed by starchitect Frank Gehry. While the group piece included many of my thoughts, I wanted to expand upon my personal reactions.
My overall impression of these initial images is that Gehry's design is thoughtful and inoffensive, but also underwhelming. Gehry has always been a better sculptor than architect, and is usually at his best when designing things that aren't traditional buildings, such as the Pritzker Pavilion.
Memorials, unlike traditional work/live buildings, are great opportunities for sculpture, so disappointed to see one of the world's great sculptors essentially punt.
The semi-circular inner plaza element is evocative of the FDR and MLK memorials, with its informal placement of decorated stone blocks. The look is attractive enough, but it's beginning to be a cliche. In my opinion it's the least ambitious part of the memorial, ironic considering it's the focal point.
In any event, the restrained central plaza should present an interesting dichotomy to the much more formal and monumentally-sized outer elements, the cylinders and metal tapestries.
The cylinders do more than any other element to make the memorial visually striking from a distance, and so are indispensable to the design, but at 80 feet tall and lacking any details whatsoever they will be too bare up close. Like the lackluster inner plaza, the cylinders are a missed opportunity for sculpture. If I were the designer I might go classical, but Gehry could propose something like bareiss columns and that would be just as good.
I also have mixed feelings about the other major element of the memorial, the metal tapestries. I appreciate and agree with the desire to cover up the Education Department building, but to do so with oversized picture panels is a touch contrived, a little too easy. It's like we've taken the tarps that are supposed to hide the parking garages at Nationals Ballpark and turned them into a monument. It's a difficult problem, but is that *really* the best we can do?
Gehry deserves credit for restraining himself from retreading his own familiar shtick. Another mass of crumbled titanium would have been inappropriate; it would be memorial to Gehry himself more so than Eisenhower. But at the same time I have to say I'm disappointed that there's nothing daring in this proposal. Such rare opportunities for artful civic sculpture shouldn't be ignored. This memorial could be worse, but it could also be a lot better.
Cross-posted at BeyondDC.
Comments
- Cyclists are special and do have their own rules
- M Street cycle track keeps improving, draws church anger
- O'Malley announces first projects using new gas tax money
- Can Loudoun grow while protecting its rural areas?
- ICC losing bus service in classic bait and switch
- Silver Spring mall could get massive facelift, new name
- WMATA launches "Short Trip" rail pass on SmarTrip







by Omar on Mar 26, 2010 2:19 pm • link • report
by Thayer-D on Mar 26, 2010 2:49 pm • link • report
LEt's just carve "Beware the Military-Industrial Complex" above all the entrances of the Pentagon and call it a day.
by Redline SOS on Mar 26, 2010 2:57 pm • link • report
Thayer: That's not a bad point.
by BeyondDC on Mar 26, 2010 3:01 pm • link • report
by NikolasM on Mar 26, 2010 4:23 pm • link • report
by Canaan on Mar 26, 2010 5:44 pm • link • report
2. I goofed up my first post anyway. I meant to say "Is there anything about his MIC speech?"
by Canaan on Mar 26, 2010 5:47 pm • link • report
It looks like the lack of competition has left this within exactly what the committee was trying to avoid: mediocrity.
by ogden on Mar 26, 2010 6:40 pm • link • report
2. Has there been any talk about a President's park somewhere nearby but not on the mall? A tourist destination in and of itself with smaller memorials recognizing our Presidents? Or perhaps we could expand the mall by tearing down some of those SW buildings and creating a President's park in SW?
by opinionated on Mar 27, 2010 8:35 am • link • report
http://wwwtripwithinthebeltway.blogspot.com/2010/03/eisenhowers-burning-tree-commute-desire.html
by Douglas A. Willinger on Mar 28, 2010 9:12 pm • link • report
http://www.presidentspark.org/
by Andrew on Mar 28, 2010 10:09 pm • link • report
In general I fail to see the connection between the memorial and Eisenhower. I guess the columns are vaguely suggestive of highway columns. But shoot, I think the first thing that one would think of for an Eisenhower memorial would be his leadership of the allied forces in WWII. And D-Day in particular. Yes, he is also associated with the highways, but I wonder if they are really very appropriate for a monument to a president? Highways tend to be ugly, utilitarian and of course the source of lots of social and environmental destruction. Not exactly heroic, which is what you want for a monument, isn't it?
On the other hand, it may be better than the MLK monument - the oversized Great Leader statue being carved in China. How does that thing make sense?
I agree with whoever said that the competition must have been really poor if this was the winning design.
And in general, I agree that we don't need an Eisenhower monument. Where do you stop?
by Josh S on Mar 29, 2010 9:29 am • link • report
Couldn't agree more about MLK statue. They shouldn't forget to inscribe "MADE IN CHINA" on the back!
by Thayer-D on Mar 29, 2010 9:59 am • link • report
But yes Thayer, all conceptual references are BS.
by Neil Flanagan on Mar 29, 2010 10:18 am • link • report
by Johnny on Mar 30, 2010 10:13 pm • link • report
Add a Comment