Greater Greater Washington

Preservation


Preservation "incompatible" with historic preservation

There is a lot of bad blood between the Dupont Circle ANC and the HPRB. Even before the Elkins case (news story, court opinion) gives additional ammunition to critics of the board.

I don't yet know enough about the history or the law to have an opinion about HPRB's overall operation. But there was something funny about their ruling in December about the The ANC, especially Chairman Ramon Estrada, who lives near the project, opposes the size of the project and has voiced concerns about traffic impacts on the alleys and side streets. They sought to use an existing curb cut on 14th Street as the entrance to the underground garage, rather than having cars access the building through the alley or on T Street. The architect, Eric Colbert, expressed a willingness to explore this possibility at December's ANC meeting.

HPRB, though, disagreed about the 14th Street access idea, ruling that "maintaining or creating a curb cut for parking, loading, and trash on 14th Street would be incompatible with the character of the district." I find it disturbingly ironic that maintaining anything could be incompatible with historic character, especially given that when As for the U Street project, its many issues are complex. My personal feeling is that density near a Metro station is a valuable public policy goal, and therefore we should allow and encourage large buildings in these areas. At the same time, there's no reason not to also make the building attractive and harmonious with the surrounding historic architecture, as well as avoiding harmful traffic impacts.

The best option was one suggested by Colbert at December's ANC meeting: reducing the amount of parking entirely. DC mandates minimum parking requirements for new buildings, but according to Colbert there is precedent for waiving some of this for development near transit, coupled with restrictions that would limit or eliminate residents' eligibility for parking permits. In essence, the building would attract residents willing to live without cars (and use Zipcars), knowing that they couldn't simply park on the street and would have to pay for scarcer garage spaces. Creating more car-free residential housing is exactly what DC should be doing to build a less car-dependent city, the only way to keep traffic congestion down as the city grows.

David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington and Greater Greater Education. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater. 

Comments

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or