Greater Greater Washington

Govs, Fenty should lead instead of whining about WMATA

Everybody seems to want to have more control over WMATA, but far fewer want to show leadership to try to improve it. The latest vague noises about WMATA oversight come from Mayor Fenty and Governors McDonnell and O'Malley, who gave a press conference about wanting more control over an agency they've virtually ignored.


Photo by blahmni.

According to the Post's Frerick Kunkle,

All three agreed that they wanted to have better oversight over WMATA's management and the people they appoint to run it.

All three were more than a little vague about how this would happen, except to say they would ask Congress to make legislative changes. And they agreed to meet and talk some more.

"I think we have some consensus that some improvements are needed in that compact to give us more oversight," McDonnell (R) said. "I think, quite frankly, we agree we need more accountability at WMATA," Fenty (D) said. "We would like to have more direct oversight over WMATA, and not less," O'Malley (D) said. "And I think that was the bottom line coming out of today's discussions."

This might sound good in the press, but is extremely ironic since these three have plenty of oversight authority already which they've neglected to exercise.

And, not surprisingly, none of the three took transit to the event.

The Tri-State Oversight Committee, which exercises the safety oversight the leaders say is lacking, is directly under the control of those three. The members of TOC are employees of DDOT, MDOT and VDOT, and thus report directly to Fenty, O'Malley and McDonnell. Yet prior to the crash, TOC was virtually invisible to the heads of the DOTs and the elected leaders.

When TOC ran into problems like being denied access to tracks, they didn't feel they had the access to the top to escalate the problem. If WMATA lacked effective oversight before last year's crash, Fenty, O'Malley, and former Governor Tim Kaine were the ones with the most direct ability to change the situation.

Fixing that was the one constructive change the three did announce: "The Tri-State Oversight Committee would receive 'additional executive authority' with monthly reviews and reporting requirements," according to Kunkle.

It's rich to hear O'Malley complain about not having more accountability given that he personally appoints the WMATA Board members from Maryland. What power does he want, exactly? O'Malley has kept mum about WMATA's funding problems, even while most local representatives have asked for support.

His administration is also deferring existing capital commitments and resisting renewing its capital commitments. That money is necessary to replace unsafe railcars and avoid dangerous overcrowding. If O'Malley thinks things can be better at WMATA, he could start by making public statements about what he'd actually do to make things better.

Fenty didn't put anything in the budget to help maintain service, despite receiving hundreds of emails from DC residents asking for a Fair Share for Metro. In his reply to those residents, he falsely said the WMATA Board decides budget issues, when in fact he does.

His administration does only get one vote on the Board, but has kept the overly-busy City Administrator Neil Albert in the seat, who doesn't ever say much at meetings. Jim Graham, the Council's rep, is much more active. Fenty and Albert could also start having more oversight over WMATA by talking publicly about how they'd like to change things, instead of just how they'd like more control.

As for McDonnell, he can indeed complain about not having more power over WMATA. He doesn't appoint anyone to the Board, since the local jurisdictions do that. However, that's because the State of Virginia doesn't pay for transit service. In general, Virginia has spent most of its energy (under Democratic and Republican governors alike) ignoring WMATA with the exception of pushing for a new line, and spending all its transportation money on everything but transit.

However, he can do plenty to improve transit, like instructing VDOT to start working constructively to implement bus priority corridors around the state, or letting Northern Virginia jurisdictions tax themselves if they so choose to support transit.

WMATA isn't perfect. There's plenty to improve. However, a lack of control is not getting in the way of O'Malley, Fenty, and McDonnell taking clear steps to start fixing the situation. They've taken one very small step to change the one area they control unilaterally, but could do plenty more. It's just easier to blame others instead of trying to work to fix things.

David Alpert is the founder and editor-in-chief of Greater Greater Washington. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He now lives with his wife and daughter in Dupont Circle. 

Comments

Add a comment »

Hypocrisy gets you nowhere and actually loses you political points.

Tell O'Malley that even Ehrlich would have had sense enough to take Metro.

by Redline SOS on Apr 20, 2010 1:39 pm • linkreport

Fenty is scum. The sooner District voters realize this, the better. He's a corrupt, dishonest, ignorant, inarticulate hack.

by CP on Apr 20, 2010 1:43 pm • linkreport

This article is so good, you should post it twice

by Teo on Apr 20, 2010 1:45 pm • linkreport

Whoops, double posting fixed.

by David Alpert on Apr 20, 2010 1:47 pm • linkreport

It really is good enough to post twice, though. Or even ten times, if that's what it takes to get the people who need to read it to actually read it.

by Miriam on Apr 20, 2010 1:51 pm • linkreport

The state of Virginia actually does contribute to capital funds for WMATA through NVTC. Legislation passed during the last General Assembly permits the money to be "flexed" to operating. Still, if my math is right, the state contributes less than the Northern Virginia jurisdictions combined (including the NoVa gas tax dedicated to Metro).

by kreeggo on Apr 20, 2010 1:58 pm • linkreport

It should also be noted that McDonnell does not have the authority to allow the Northern Virginia jurisdictions to tax themselves to further support transit. That power lies solely with the General Assembly. Good luck getting them to go along with it...

by Froggie on Apr 20, 2010 2:59 pm • linkreport

Perhaps you can send this article to WTOP, the Examiner and the WaPo before they run their (literal) copies of the press release ("Oh, it even has copy-ready quotes, great, no work for us!).

by Jasper on Apr 20, 2010 3:50 pm • linkreport

If any of them would have taken transit to the event people would be complaining that it was all for show, and that they had to get driven by security details to the train, etc, etc, etc. Just like people complain about Bloomberg riding the subway in New York.

Governors of states and mayors of major cities need 24 hour security details. That is a fact of life. Putting a "protectee" on public transit will thus always involve a large degree of stage managing and will always look like little more than a photo-op.

by urbaner on Apr 20, 2010 7:26 pm • linkreport

According to the Post, Fenty took a SmartCar home. That is some security detail.

by charlie on Apr 21, 2010 12:24 am • linkreport

Great article, David.

by Phillip Ellis on Apr 21, 2010 8:37 am • linkreport

"Governors of states and mayors of major cities need 24 hour security details. That is a fact of life."

Not really. In most other countries they do just fine without them. At the very least they could switch to unobtrusive plainclothes details.

by Phil on Apr 21, 2010 10:15 am • linkreport

Phil,

We don't live in other countries, we live in this country.

Talk to anyone involved in security right now. Threats against all public officials are up. The Supreme Court is looking to double its security budget (and that call is being led by the most conservative members of the Court by the way). There have been multiple arrests in the last 2 weeks for threats against Members of Congress from both parties.

As for security being "unobtrusive," sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't. But the people who make those calls are professionals who make those decisions based on threat assessments. They have more information on actual threats than you or I or any member of the public.

by urbaner on Apr 21, 2010 12:28 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or