Greater Greater Washington

Transit


Dulles rail decision from a backroom deal?

Is the DOT and FTA trying to force Virginia to sell the Dulles Toll Road? Did the FTA work out a deal with private investors ahead of time to reject public financing? BeyondDC picks up on an interesting angle from the Post's report that private investors are floating an idea to finance the Dulles rail extension by privatizing the Dulles Toll Road (which will require raising tolls). Two Virginia Congressmen, Democrat Jim Moran and Republican Frank Wolf, claim the FTA's decision is intended to back Virginia into a corner where its only option is privatization; BeyondDC sees this as meaning "the Feds struck a back room deal with private investors."

I keep bringing up the Virginia elected officials are totally baffled by the motivation behind this decision. Virginia did everything the FTA asked, and the FTA even told Congress the project was going forward. Back-room deal or no, there's plenty of evidence (like Peters' personal anti-rail bias) that political motives are at work.

David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington and Greater Greater Education. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater. 

Comments

This is very interesting. If my memory serves correctly, the toll road was supposed to become de-tolled in the early 2010s.

by mfs on Jan 31, 2008 2:59 pm • linkreport

Of course, as BeyondDC points out, the tolls aren't a bad thing (especially if a Metro extension is built to provide an alternative to driving). Since the road will certainly require ongoing maintenance, de-tolling it would amounts to another government subsidy for driving.

by Alpie on Jan 31, 2008 3:14 pm • linkreport

except growing up as a person who drove that almost everyday, there is no alternative to taking it. if the tolls were to subsidize metro, that would be great, but they are not going to.

by mfs on Feb 1, 2008 12:21 am • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or