What do Metro employees really make?
WMATA provided data about employee salaries, bonuses, overtime and benefits for fiscal year 2009. Is the $100,000 bus driver a myth, or reality? Does Metro depend on a lot of overtime? Are bonuses incredibly high, or used primarily as a symbolic recognition of a job well done?
First, here are the ten most common jobs at Metro:
|Title||Number||Avg Salary||Max Salary||Avg Overtime|
|Bus Operations Mgr||139||77,400||92,500||900|
|Metro Police MTPD||114||68,100||86,900||12,700|
This is a high cost area, and you want people to want these jobs to stick with them for enough years that they have some experience. The jobs that require more specialized skills, involve greater personal risk or supervisory roles are compensated higher than less risky or less skilled jobs.
When you compare this compensation against the Federal government's GS scale and equivalent jobs posted on USA Jobs.com, the WMATA employees typically make a couple of dollars more per hour compared to Federal workers. They also enjoy better pensions, but no defined contribution matching like TSP, and have higher employer contributions to health care plans. The feds pay for 2/3 of a health care plan, while WMATA has agreed to pay for only 3/4 of the increase in health care costs, which the union representatives I've talked to refer to as a concession to WMATA.
Average bus operators and train operators don't normally make over $50-70k. On the other hand, a few bus or operators put in enough overtime to qualify for the $100,000 per year club, all by putting in significant amounts of overtime:
Some instances of high overtime are related to long hours put in by supervisors and track workers in the aftermath of the June 22 accident or other incidents. In all, almost 400 employees got a third of their total compensation from overtime (that is, overtime added half of their base salary).
I do not begrudge employees that put in a lot of overtime their fair pay, and I understand that working long hours sucks, and overtime is a fair way to compensate people for working long hours. Having many employees extended so far beyond their normal working hours is a good example of Metro's funding challenge. Metro understands this, they've discussed reducing their overtime and they've made some progress on overtime.
Considering Metro pensions are based on your highest four earning years, including overtime, excessive overtime can hurt Metro's bottom line not only in the current year, but for years to come if the pensions are increased dramatically by overtime. The pension multiplier for the first 27 years of service is a reasonable 1.7 times your high four years of earnings, but most other government agencies would calculate it based on only your base salary.
What did Metro's top managers make in 2009? Here are the top ten spots, ranked by salary plus bonuses:
|Title||Salary||Overtime + Bonus|
|Chief Financial Officer||235,000||15,000|
|Deputy General Manager||235,800||0|
|Deputy General Manager||231,000||0|
|Chief Safety Officer||181,300||10,000|
|Assistant General Manager, Bus Services||184,000||0|
|Chief of Staff||172,700||200|
|Chief Performance Officer||170,700||200|
Considering the General Manager and his top staff are responsible for running an organization of over 10,000 employees and managing billions of dollars in assets, these salaries do not seem too out of line or unreasonable.
Who at Metro makes more than $100,000 per year in salary only, other than top managers? From the looks of the data, the police force, white collar workers like contract administrators, attorneys, engineers and IT professionals earn that much.
Who makes over $100,000 per year when you include overtime and (less frequently) bonuses? Over 700 employees. Very few train operators or bus drivers. Lots of police officers, Almost 400 police officers, the supervisors of Metrorail central control and the superintendents in charge of maintaining the tracks and wayside communications. Several very senior mechanics. Senior operations supervisors, and very senior (AA grade) technicians.
|Position||Number of $100K+ employees|
|Metro Police Officers||74|
|Track and Wayside Supervisors||17|
|Mechanic AA ELCL PWRHV Rail||16|
|Central Control Supervisor||15|
|Shift Supervisor ELCL POWER TIES||15|
|Rail Station Manager||10|
|Rail Operations Supervisor||9|
Therefore, a few employees at Metro make over $100,000 a year, but they are either senior managers or supervisors, or put in significant amounts of overtime. Given the demands of long hours and the high costs of living here, it's not unreasonable for some workers to make that much.
On the other hand, it's hard to tell what are reasonable wages for transit workers without knowing how hard Metro has to work to recruit new talent. If wages are too low, Metro will find it difficult to recruit people that will put up with inflexible working hours, often starting early in the morning and ending late in the evening, with a no-man's-land of dead time in the middle of the day. Leave must be scheduled months in advance.
What do you think? Do you think the pay is too high? Was it higher than you expected, or just about right, or not enough? Should Metro push to increase pension rates, but require that the pension calculations reflect regular hours only?
Update: I added a link in the article to the 400-page PDF containing the salary data.
- DC has almost no white residents without college degrees. (It's a different story for black residents.)
- I don't care what some people say: DC has great transportation options.
- The biggest beneficiaries of housing subsidies? The wealthy.
- Clearly we need to have more happy hours in Prince George's
- Metro badly needs culture change, everyone agrees. Can it pull it off?
- VRE's map keeps getting more diagrammatic
- How five local businesspeople would tackle gentrification on 14th Street