Greater Greater Washington

Meta


Greater How?

Urban centers and walkable suburbs in America are experiencing a renaissance, including the Washington, DC region. Unfortunately, too many people are forced to leave great neighborhoods to find affordable housing or good schools. If people want to live in single-family homes, they certainly may. But everyone should have the choice to live in an apartment or townhouse in a walkable, safe, livable neighborhood.

People make a city great. Downtown job centers, historic neighborhoods, and new edge cities should all be full of people, walking to do errands, sitting outside at sidewalk cafes, enjoying parks, living life, and interacting with each other. Unfortunately, the streets of downtown DC are fairly empty during the day and even quieter on weekends, with little more than one inward-facing office building after another. We should encourage more mixed-use development downtown, with more residences and more retail shops, enabling restaurants to operate all week and more people to live near where they work.

We should continue the trend of building new, mixed-use neighborhoods in areas such as Arlington, Alexandria, Bethesda, College Park, Rockville, Silver Spring and Tysons Corner as well as the District of Columbia, where people can live, work, eat, shop and find entertainment in walking distance. We should construct buildings that engage a vibrant street life, with stores and restaurants and human-scale features, rather than cutting themselves off from the wider world.

We should expand Metro and build streetcars in DC to allow more people to get to work and other destinations without need of a car. We should put higher density development near transit stations, to enable more people to travel without cars, and so that the region can grow without adding traffic congestion. We should make it easier for people to get to work by walking or biking or rollerblading if they wish, with adequate and safe sidewalks, bike lanes and paths.

We should stop building new highways which only foster more driving and more traffic. And we should set appropriate prices for driving in and out of our city, or using parking spaces in our neighborhoods, so that people who choose to own cars, use the roads, and park pay the fair cost of the land they are using, without being unfairly burdened or subsidized.

The Washington, DC area is already great. DC itself has some of the most beautiful, mixed-use, and transit-accessible neighborhoods in any American city. Arlington and Bethesda contain Smart Growth areas that are models for cities everywhere. As the region grows, we must preserve what already works and expand what is possible, to ensure that there are enough great neighborhoods for everyone who wants to live, work, shop or play in one.

David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington and Greater Greater Education. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater. 

Comments

Add a comment »

What about making a Greater Greater Washington forum? It would be a start in the right direction.

by Zac on Jul 24, 2008 11:48 am • linkreport

"We should stop building new highways which only foster more driving and more traffic."

D.C. has already done that for the past 25 years or so, with the results we see today.

Now there would be a place for some change, starting with building the I-395 tunnel extension.

http://wwwtripwithinthebeltway.blogspot.com/2007/11/i-395-extension-superior-option.html

by Douglas Willinger on Jul 24, 2008 12:18 pm • linkreport

Douglas: What results? That it's a great city? That more people take transit than any other large U.S. city except New York? That more people are able to walk to work than any other city in this country except Boston? That we have many wonderful, remarkably intact historic neighborhoods, which are highly desirable? That people are moving into the city in great numbers?

I don't know about you, but the results look pretty great.

by David Alpert on Jul 24, 2008 1:41 pm • linkreport

One other result is that traffic in D.C. is less congested than in the suburbs that built interstate highways with their Federal aid money rather than transferring it to transit as the district did.

by Ben Ross on Jul 24, 2008 2:37 pm • linkreport

Boston is the city with the large underground interstate highway beneath a linear park through its central area.

The DC area meanwhile has some of the worse traffic congestion, such as New York Avenue where I-395 dumps into to, and even the better official planning (all plagued by a tunnel with questionably tight geometry) has I-395 dump all onto New York Avenue rather then continue as a parallel freeway which could go beneath the parking lots alongside it (beneath a new promenade lined with development.

Also, what happened to the population figures of DC with the freeway cancellations?

BTW- I don't necessarily say that the cancellations of the freeway plans was bad- just look at the vanguard of historic residential DC that the 1971 plan would have decimated, and compare with my superior option that reduces displacement by 95% while providing greater safety.

http://wwwtripwithinthebeltway.blogspot.com/2007/11/i-395-extension-superior-option.html

There was definitely room for improvement.

Likewise with the North Central Freeway- which IMHO was deliberately botched.

by Douglas Willinger on Jul 25, 2008 11:59 am • linkreport

Is someone actually trying to suggest Boston's Big Dig as a success story? Adjusting the original estimates and the final cost both to 2006 dollars it came in 2.5x over budget. The cost was 14.6 Billion (2006) dollars for 3.5 miles. That's with starting the project in the 1980's. Starting a similar 20 year endeavor today might cost more like 30 billion. This wasn't all federal money. The state had to kick in as well. D.C. doesn't have the tax base of an entire state to pull in.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Dig_(Boston,_Massachusetts)

by FourthandEye on Jul 25, 2008 12:15 pm • linkreport

No, D.C. it has a Federal government that could pay for an entire comprehensive subway system -- trains and vehicular -- with diverting a few days or weeks of the Pentagon-Pentagram budget.

Interesting how with all of the talk about a changed reality post 911 and the need for additional evacuation route capacity, that officials want to go backwards by reducing evacuation capacity.

Also, did not the WMATA system have cost overruns?

Was it built at its initial estimated cost, or ...?

by Douglas Willinger on Jul 25, 2008 1:39 pm • linkreport

Newsflash, Douglas: The feds generally cover a significant (if not majority) portion of most transit projects in this country. Metro was no exception.

by Adam on Jul 25, 2008 2:34 pm • linkreport

DC highways since about 1982 appear to be the exception- especially the thing about additional evacuation route capacity. They have neglected the subway system's vehicular components, and have built nothing since the northern I-395 tunnel.

Strange considering the Fed's predilection for all sorts of domestic (dissident) surveillance.

by Douglas Willinger on Jul 25, 2008 2:50 pm • linkreport

why do u think that the greater washington area is a good place to start a buisness..... please give feedback because i have no idea and this will help me with my school project :) thnx... !!!!!!

by ME on Sep 27, 2008 4:59 pm • linkreport

the tunnel in boston was at least, a good idea. boston had miles of shore that had nothing but a highway, when it could have been nice shore-side property. something was wrong with the company they hired to dig it.

and boston is a nice walkable town, everyone i've met from there tells me so.

i've always felt that the worst of dc's traffic comes from more recent road projects...development along 270 and inadequate roads leading into it, and of course, all of northern virginia...it's like one big maze of roads, and no mass transit in sight. friends who live out there say they spend most of their days in traffic.

should i mention my son develops this asthmatic cough during afternoon rush hour?

by kenshin on Jan 5, 2009 11:18 pm • linkreport

Recommend we add improving bus service and promoting market-based parking to this list.

by Michael Perkins on Mar 12, 2009 5:28 pm • linkreport

So, if your vision conflicts with that of the ANCs and the Neighborhood Residents, what then? In our democracy, the majority vision is the correct vision. Your vision has yet to catch on with the Majority because we don't want to be New York or Hong Kong. We want to be a Souther, Family, Green Town with character and distinction and Green Trees, not just another "ChinaTown" overdevelopment without a true China Character. Development should be for People and not against them. If Low Density Development is the will of the DC residents and High Density Development is your vision, then you are working against the will of the people and I am sorry that you feel like you must spend your vast resources fighting the people you claim to want to help. I implore you to develop a Vision that does not Change the Nature of DC, but compliments and accentuates our Green Spaces and Low Density Nature. The future is Trees, Not Concrete. Thanks.

by Guy Durant on Apr 1, 2009 4:01 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or