Greater Greater Washington

Roads


South Capitol: L'Enfant strikes back

From the South Capitol EIS:

As a primary corridor in L'Enfant's 1791 Plan for the City of Washington, South Capitol Street was envisioned as one of the symbolic gateways to the city and its Monumental Core. ... Today, South Capitol Street lacks any characteristics of its historic and intended function as a gateway. ... South Capitol Street is an urban freeway that has become a conduit for through traffic at the expense of serving the needs of residents and businesses in the corridor. The transportation infrastructure is obsolete, in deteriorating condition, and fails to provide necessary connections to community destinations for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, or motorists.

DC will be restoring South Capitol as a grand gateway and make it a street worthy of the new neighborhoods replacing the industrial uses in that section of the city. They just released two final alternatives, which can be basically summarized as better and even more better.

Both alternatives reduce many of the worst elements of suburban traffic design in the region. The Southwest/Southeast Freeway is enormously urban-unfriendly as it is, and it has large, curving ramps for traffic to get and on off from South Capitol. Both alternatives seek to replace the northbound on-ramp, that crosses over South Capitol, with a shorter ramp that cars access by turning left from South Capitol.

Today, medians block cross traffic on many of the streets, making it easier for people to drive through but harder for people to get in and out of the surrounding neighborhood, or cross from one side to another either on foot or by car. There is also an underpass at M Street which speeds traffic through but makes the intersection much more pedestrian-unfriendly, and makes the L and O intersections more dangerous because of the cars coming up from the underpass.

Work is already underway to allow turns and cross traffic at O and P streets, next to the ballpark. Alternative 2 would cut through the medians at the other streets as well, and replace the underpass with an at-grade intersection, which would make the area much more inviting.

At the southern end of the Frederick Douglass Bridge, the roadway divides into high-speed freeway-like interchanges which also consume a lot of waterfront land. Both alternatives plan to replace these with something more urban, either a regular intersection (in Alternative 1) or a traffic circle (in Alternative 2). Alternative 2 also creates a traffic oval at the north end of the bridge, at Potomac Avenue. I believe the traffic circles would slow traffic more at these intersections, improving pedestrian and bike safety, but am not entirely sure which is better. The existing circles in DC are fairly unpleasant to walk through or around, since there are so many different entrance and exit roadways with their own walk signals which are usually not coordinated for pedestrians.

One of the best features of Alternative 2 is replacing the cloverleaf interchange between I-295 and Suitland Parkway, which also consume a lot of city land for freeway ramps. Alternative 2 seeks to replace this with an urban diamond, the narrower type of interchange where each ramp runs alongside the freeway and intersects the road in a traffic light. (I'm curious why they don't recommend a SPUI, which is even better because left turns don't conflict.)

Both alternatives also have considerable bike, walking, running, and rollerblading infrastructure, widening several bridges and adding space for a "multi-use trail" along the Frederick Douglass bridge and Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue.

Whichever alternative gets built will substantially improve South Capitol Street. The more elements from Alternative 2 make it into the final plan, the better for the neighborhood, and the closer to the L'Enfant vision, the boulevard will be.

David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington and Greater Greater Education. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater. 

Comments

A total rip off!

Use eminent domain for public use and tear down that new monstrosity of "Nationals Stadium" to build NCPC's South Capitol Mall.

by Douglas Willinger on Feb 28, 2008 3:32 pm • linkreport

Too late, dude. Who is going to come up with the 600 million the city just spent building it? Building the mall up to the stadium would be nice. Make it a shrine to america's pasttime.

by NikolasM on Mar 3, 2008 6:37 pm • linkreport

The west side of NCPC's Extending the Legacy South Mall could still be built as of this date without demolishing any such new buildings.

Yeah. Preserve that monstrosity of a misplaced stadium as a monument to a power elite that placed their credibility on the line and lost. Apparantly, there are people who seem to think that such $$ is better spent on criminal wars in Iraq and elsewhere, particularly the pharmacratic inquisition.

by Douglas Willinger on Apr 20, 2008 5:09 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or

Support Us