Transit
Greater Baltimore & Washington Transit Future version 2
This map shows what the transportation system of the Baltimore-
Thanks for the many comments left on version 1 of the Greater Washington Transit Future fantasy map. I've added in almost all of the lines suggested in those comments (Columbia Pike streetcar, Potomac Yards transitway, light rail to Waldorf, etc.) I've incorporated the Baltimore expansion proposal (map and report), everything suggested by MWCOG (see page 3), rail expansion on those lines that still exist (some have been reused for Baltimore Metro or as rail trails), and the MARC growth plan (trying my best to figure out where the stations would be And without further adieu, I present version 2.0 of the Greater Baltimore & Washington Transit Future map (click for very very big version:
For more details and notes, please see the notes for version 1.
Update 4/23/08: I had made a couple of small tweaks as a start on a version 3 of this map, but never finished it; I've now updated this map to include those changes. Most notable is an extra branch of the Corridor Cities Transitway, the more direct route ACT is pushing for, and a light rail up Columbia Pike from Silver Spring to Columbia Town Center along the route suggested by Dan of Just Up the Pike. The older version is here.
Comments
- Latest Metro map drafts add Anacostia parks and other tweaks
- Bikeshare is a gateway to private biking, not competition
- Short-term Washingtonians deserve a voice, too
- DC Council makes major policy changes overnight
- Public land deals have both benefits and pitfalls
- Parklets give every block a little park
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools







by Josh on Feb 25, 2008 1:43 pm • link • report
by NikolasM on Feb 25, 2008 1:46 pm • link • report
NikolasM: Can you point me to detailed proposals for what else should go in Virginia? The most helpful would be a specific list of lines to add and pointers to something on the Web that has a detailed description or map.
As for Annapolis, I'd love a connection there, but it appears that the rail lines were all turned into roads or rail trails. Is there a usable ROW left? It may be splitting fantasy hairs here, but I'm trying to keep this particular map to things that are seriously proposed (others are, of course, free to fantasize about different transit scenarios; I'll post soon a national super fantasy map I did a few years back).
by David Alpert on Feb 25, 2008 2:13 pm • link • report
by Chris L on Feb 25, 2008 2:16 pm • link • report
by Steve on Feb 25, 2008 2:25 pm • link • report
by Toby on Feb 25, 2008 2:25 pm • link • report
But it's totally awesome. Let this be a call for the folks in charge of the individual systems to have a summit and plan for the future together.
I assume the thin purple/yellow/blue lines are trollies, and the pastel green/orange/grey lines are trains? The trolly lines are looking a bit complicated; I suppose these are the routes proposed by DDOT?
And is there a need for transportation west of Georgetown? Your proposed lines all end there... would it be efficient to have a Potomac crossing there, perhaps through Glen Echo, then into Clarendon?
by Michael on Feb 25, 2008 3:29 pm • link • report
Steve: Rail trails are valuable too—we need recreation and transportation alike to make a livable city.
Michael: Yes, the thicker lines with bold stations are heavy rail and the thinner lines are light rail.
by David Alpert on Feb 25, 2008 4:04 pm • link • report
by Ben Ross on Feb 25, 2008 4:27 pm • link • report
No matter what, SOMEONE will scream bloody murder over trail reclamation (or non-reclamation).
I also wonder about the poor unwitting European who happens upon this glorious (that's not sarcasm) map while researching a trip to Washington, DC. It could lead to a vast misunderstanding of the region's transit infrastructure.
by Steve on Feb 25, 2008 5:11 pm • link • report
by David Alpert on Feb 25, 2008 5:33 pm • link • report
1) The MWCOG pdf mentions an "I-66 Metrorail Extension from Vienna to Centreville." If this were to continue down the I-66 right of way, some obvious places for stops would be:
a) Chain Bridge Rd/Fairfax City, b) Fair Oaks/Gov't Center, c) Fair Lakes, d) Rte. 28/Centreville
2) You've got Manassas south of the Four Mile stop on the Columbia Park streetcar line, when in fact it's far west and a little south of the Orange Line's Vienna stop. To make sense of transit options in western Fairfax and northern Prince William, the Culpeper/Haymarket branch of the MVX in reality would need to be much longer and to be oriented far north and west of where you have it.
by karl on Feb 25, 2008 5:41 pm • link • report
by BeyondDC on Feb 26, 2008 12:21 pm • link • report
by RJ on Feb 26, 2008 1:02 pm • link • report
I'm sure there is lots of NIMBYism in Alexandria, but from the times I have visited, my reaction to King was always that it should be turned into a pedestrian mall with streetcars. The adjacent streets are one-way and designed to carry most of the traffic anyway.
by David Alpert on Feb 26, 2008 1:09 pm • link • report
Long story short: the plan is not online, but the route (from Wheaton to Burtonsville or from Silver Spring to Burtonsville) is pretty straight-forward.
See this map I drafted six years ago proposing light-rail to Columbia Town Center, hooking up with the proposed MTA line to Baltimore.
By the way, David: great blog and great maps! keep 'em coming.
-Dan Reed
www.justupthepike.com
along US 29. It would go south from Burtonsville along 29, turn west in Burnt Mills on a "Route 29 spur" between 29 and 193 (thus avoiding traffic in Four Corners, but it was never built) and then follow 193 to the Wheaton metor
by dan reed on Feb 26, 2008 2:36 pm • link • report
by NikolasM on Feb 26, 2008 5:11 pm • link • report
I really like the rest of this map. Especially the idea of continuing the Columbia Pike Streetcar along Route 7 into Tysons - Is that your idea or did it come from somewhere else? But, really, the ACT version of the Corridor Cities Transitway makes more sense than what you have - witness the recently released low ridership numbers for the current design.
Another thought: What about extending the Green Line north from Waterside Mall under 4th Street to connect to Federal Center SW and Judiciary Square and/or Union Station? (With a pedestrian connection to the Yellow Line at L'Enfant Plaza.) This would effectively double the capacity of the Yellow Line bridge over the Potomac and free up capacity for the Silver Line by allowing more Blue Line trains to use the bridge.
About RJ's suggestion: There is a rail spur into Old Town Alexandria from the north. If you go from the Wilson Bridge into Old Town, you might consider continuing on the rail spur rather than up King Street.
by Ben Ross on Feb 27, 2008 1:35 pm • link • report
Also: kudos on your use of the ReCAPTCHA system. It's a brilliant idea that I haven't seen anybody actually use.
by Adam on Feb 27, 2008 6:54 pm • link • report
Also, just noticed that the three stops at the upper right corner (what looks like a MARC Penn line extension) appear improperly ordered. If I'm not mistaken, one arrives at Perryville, then enters Delaware, at which point you would arrive at Newark, followed by Wilmington. This is coming from Washington or Baltimore, btw.
by Adam on Feb 27, 2008 7:19 pm • link • report
by Ben Ross on Feb 27, 2008 10:26 pm • link • report
(the planned Landover Gateway development is taking the place of the former Landover Mall and Woodmore Towne Centre is being planned as well)
by MacGyver on Feb 28, 2008 1:31 am • link • report
http://tracktwentynine.blogspot.com/2008/02/make-no-little-plans-ii.html
Its slightly different than what you've done here; rather than try to combine LRT, Metro, and Regional all into one map, Matt has focused on regional rail only. Its a thoughtful analysis...check it out.
by Chris Loos on Feb 28, 2008 9:36 am • link • report
It also boggles my mind that there is no mass transit whatsoever from Annapolis to Washington along the US 50 corridor.
by Patrick Startt on Feb 28, 2008 10:19 am • link • report
NikolasM: I'll look into these. If you can find anything with more detail that would help.
Ben: I thought the ACT plan (with the routing along 270) might be unnecessary if MVX ran frequent, transit-like service on the MARC line which basically serves the same areas as the ACT recommended line. Or would that not do it?
Adam: I'll look into Frederick-Baltimore (the Track Twenty-Nine map has that). Thanks regarding reCaptcha! It made my spam problem go away almost completely. And about the northeast stops: oops, you're right. I'll fix that.
Ben again: is there anything online from the PG Co. Co. about the Purple Line extension?
by David Alpert on Feb 28, 2008 4:09 pm • link • report
by md 20/400 on Feb 28, 2008 8:30 pm • link • report
The idea of transit-like service on the MARC line is attractive, but it would require either adding tracks all the way into DC for which right of way does not now exist, or building an entirely new bypass freight line around the city. Either option is likely to be much, much more expensive than any version of the CCT. (Yes, lesser service upgrades on MARC are possible without overcoming such daunting obstacles, but they would not compare to the level of service expected on the CCT.)
I don't know the answer to your question about Prince George's.
by Ben Ross on Feb 29, 2008 4:57 pm • link • report
http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?msa=0&msid=105879709890582843761.000434c02d86118a247d2
I think that Ritchie Hwy (MD2) could easily support light rail lines running along it and is easily accessible by foot from the surrounding communities and shopping centers. Feel free to use, take sections, bits, or pieces, be inspired, ect.
by BK on Feb 29, 2008 5:07 pm • link • report
by John V. on Mar 3, 2008 4:57 pm • link • report
by J. Kohout on Mar 3, 2008 5:44 pm • link • report
by Daniel Sturgeon on Mar 3, 2008 7:49 pm • link • report
by Jody on Mar 3, 2008 8:56 pm • link • report
by R. Dyleson on Mar 3, 2008 11:54 pm • link • report
by Tom Christoffel on Mar 4, 2008 12:30 am • link • report
by Tom on Mar 4, 2008 9:28 am • link • report
by Meghan on Mar 4, 2008 9:31 am • link • report
Also, check your spelling of "Linthicum".
by soars on Mar 4, 2008 10:30 am • link • report
by Wade on Mar 4, 2008 10:49 am • link • report
I would add some interconnectivity on the NOVA side of things. Some lines near the Fairfax and PW County Parkways for instance.
And you could pull the purple line from Bethesda over the bridge to Tyson's/Falls Church
Oh, and why stop at Culpepper. Why not go al the way to Charlottesville or the I-81/I-64 intersection?
Does anybody have the phone number of Warren Buffet for some financing?
Now the next step of the plan please. How do we get this financed?
by Jasper on Mar 4, 2008 11:43 am • link • report
Continuing the "purple" ex B&O Georgetown Branch w/ a spur to the west would do.
As to Frederick to Baltimore on the existing trackage, this is the oldest RR route in the US, and even with the upgrades over the years wiggles like a snake. Much better would be to take over the median of I 70 with gentler curves and better grades.
by david vartanoff on Mar 4, 2008 1:05 pm • link • report
by NikolasM on Mar 4, 2008 2:53 pm • link • report
NikolasM: I made it in Microsoft Visio.
I agree Frederick-Baltimore, Baltimore-Annapolis, and Annapolis-Washington would be great. Maybe it's fodder for another separate map which would have some new rail lines, since there isn't a good ROW for them now except Frederick-Baltimore which is very wiggly.
by David Alpert on Mar 5, 2008 1:51 pm • link • report
Very interesting thought. However, it does not address the single most significant shortcoming to transportation around this region - lack of ability to cross the Potomac River. Sure, the new Wilson Bridge will help and I see your line by the 14th Street bridge. But there is nothing northwest of the city - where the highest demand is and arguably, the greatest need. Additionally, the argument for Tysons is that it will help suburb to suburb commuting - but you don't connect many of the lines, instead, rely upon hub and spoke via DC, which is unreasonable for capacity reasons.
My fantasy line - I would like to see the Orange line continue down I-66 to route 28, then turn north and cross the Potomac over to Shady Grove, with stops at 7100 Fair Lakes, Centreville (28 and 66), Westfields, Udvar-Hazy Air and Space Museum, IAD, Dulles Town Center, Aventiene, then Shady Grove.
Too many stops (like much of the graphics you show) only impede people from taking public transportation as it greatly increases the amount of time to go point to point. As soon as you start saying "only 3 more minutes" you immediately have a 10 minute problem, if not more - think of how the metro trains now struggle to not crowd each other.
Good thoughts, keep the imagination going and some day hopefully fantasy will become reality.
by Steven on Mar 6, 2008 10:23 am • link • report
Interstate 70 has quite a wide median between the Baltimore beltway and Frederick — how about there? (Don't know if the wide median was intentional for future mass transit or what, but it doesn't really matter in the end...) It could either connect to — or be an extension of — the Baltimore Red Line at its I-70 station, and connect to the MARC line at Frederick (which crosses right under I-70 there).
by soars on Mar 6, 2008 12:35 pm • link • report
by NikolasM on Mar 6, 2008 12:51 pm • link • report
Steven (& Ben from earlier): Clearly making the Purple Line a complete circle is something we need to do!
by David Alpert on Mar 6, 2008 1:37 pm • link • report
by Jeeves on Mar 7, 2008 6:16 pm • link • report
by soars on Mar 11, 2008 9:56 am • link • report
by Nick on Mar 15, 2008 1:07 pm • link • report
- Silver Line to Leesburg
- Orange Line to Centreville or Chantilly
- Blue Line to Potomac Mills Mall/Dale City
- VA 28 Light Rail
- VA 123 Light Rail from Tysons Corner to Fairfax City/GMU/Burke Center VRE
Or what about this?
Have the Blue Line take over the Yellow Line from Pentagon to L'Enfant Plaza. Have the line track left and eventually follow the current proposed route for the Silver Line. As for the track between Pentagon and Rossyln, convert it to either Light Rail or just tear it up.
by Zac on Mar 24, 2008 2:42 am • link • report
by Meghan on Apr 26, 2008 7:57 am • link • report
Also, why do the yellow and purple light rail lines end at each other in Columbia? Is this to discourage through traffic along the routes, or some other reason?
I don't mean to nitpick; I'm incredibly impressed and would love to see this happen in the future. Well done! *claps*
by Mike T on May 16, 2008 10:57 pm • link • report
by Wriiight on Jun 10, 2008 4:43 pm • link • report
by Reid on Jun 11, 2008 2:24 pm • link • report
Commuter rail to Frederick from Baltimore would be very difficult. It is single tracked all the way from Baltimore to Frederick and the grades are not the best. CSX also sends almost all of their slow moving coal trains over this route since they have an ore pier in Baltimore.
One thing that I feel is missing is rail transit north of DC.
Of course, none of this should be built until Metro is triple tracked.
by Greg on Jun 17, 2008 9:00 pm • link • report
by Derrick on Jul 9, 2008 6:16 pm • link • report
by DBX on Aug 12, 2008 10:47 am • link • report
by MJofBaltimore on Sep 28, 2008 1:24 pm • link • report
At the very least, there needs to be some connection from downtown Manassas at the train station to your proposed Centreville Orange Line station. That's a distance of only about 8 miles, but it makes everything on the Orange line (and future Silver Line) in NoVa accessible to commuter rail travelers (as well as residents of the densifying and underrated downtown Manassas).
At the same time, it would provide an alternate express route for I-66 West residents who otherwise might drive in a bit to take the Orange Line to the Pentagon (via Rosslyn) or the western sections of downtown.
by Joey on Sep 29, 2008 10:57 am • link • report
Plus it could very effectivly be built in phases. The first phase would only make it to Briggs Cheny Road and cutting the drive in half for columbia folks, plus with all the recent road improvements to 29 there is some extra capacity to handle the traffic.
Eventualy a line would head all the way to columbia, but at that distance there would need to be a 3rd line for express train.
by matt on Sep 3, 2009 12:19 pm • link • report
by Charles on Jan 4, 2010 8:00 am • link • report
by Alex on Feb 28, 2010 3:36 pm • link • report
by Alex on Feb 28, 2010 3:59 pm • link • report
by priscilla on Mar 5, 2010 4:37 pm • link • report
by Alex on Mar 7, 2010 11:27 am • link • report
I had recently made something on Google Maps called "Purple Line,Silver Line".
by Alex on Jul 13, 2010 10:27 am • link • report
by Jon Hartsock on Jul 13, 2010 11:08 am • link • report
As for D.C., I've already made some comments on what you did for the other map, so I'll try not to repeat myself unless necessary. As I was saying there, I don't think extending the Yellow Line or any sort of existing line out to Columbia is a good idea, Light Rail seems like a good alternative. It's probably better that it temporarily be serviced by Baltimore, maybe even having another line connecting that and the red line in Baltimore sometime in the future. Another thing I did mention in the other post that I think needs mentioning is that I think the Purple Line should at least extend to Tyson's Corner, if not circle around the entire D.C. area. Also, up in the Rockville/Gaithersburg area, it might be better to extend the Red Line to Metropolitan Grove instead of having two Light Rail lines diverge and both end at Shady Grove. Seems kinda redundant IMO.
by Alex on Jun 15, 2012 11:47 am • link • report
by Tina H on Feb 10, 2013 7:51 pm • link • report
by Harry on Feb 14, 2013 4:20 pm • link • report
Add a Comment