Greater Greater Washington

Development


Vince Gray talks IZ, New Communities, and rent control

At the recent blogger roundtable, Mayoral candidate Vince Gray talked about his goal to unite residents in "One City."


Photo by Geoff Hatchard.

He noted that while DC is currently "very divided by geography, age, gender, and race," ultimately "people have got to feel like there's a place for them." While education, economic development, and workforce education are pieces of this puzzle, without suitable and ample housing for all, we will continue to struggle as a divided city.

Gray noted that he pushed for inclusionary zoning from the start of the two-and-a-half year struggle to get the regulation on the books, working through one emergency legislation after another while the Fenty administration delayed implementation. Lamenting the loss of potentially hundreds of affordable housing units during the hold-up, Gray says that if elected mayor, he will "aggressively implement" IZ.

Another housing issue we discussed was rent control. Under current legislation, which Gray co-sponsored, rent control is up for re-authorization every five years. Gray promised that, as mayor, he would work to make rent control permanent, though he acknowledged it could potentially be challenged as unconstitutional.

Avoiding displacement is perhaps one of the most daunting challenges to housing equity. Under federal programs like HOPE VI, new mixed-income, and sometimes multi-use, developments are built with the intention of providing homes for both current and new residents of the community. A hiccup comes when low-income residents "temporarily" move to make room for new construction.

Under the New Communities Initiativeestablished at the end of Anthony Williams' administrationBarry Farm (Ward 8), Lincoln Heights/Richardson Dwellings (Ward 7), Northwest One (Ward 6) and Park Morton (Ward 1) are to "transform [from] highly concentrated low-income neighborhoods into healthy mixed-income neighborhoods." Perhaps the most important component of this initiative is the guiding principle of "build first" which "calls for new housing on publicly-controlled lands to be built prior to the demolition of existing distressed housing to minimize displacement."

When asked how best to retain current residents while improving housing, education, and economic opportunities, Gray pointed immediately to New Communities. While not a new initiative, it is one we seem to have lost track of as the economic boom turned into a bust. The reality is that while most of us are facing challenges in the current climate, many residents in our city who were struggling at the peak are in further distress now.

Gray, at least on the campaign trail, is able to recognize this gulf that continues to divide DC, and he seems to be genuinely interested to continue to push for solutions that have been staring us in the face for years now. Issues like inclusionary zoning, rent control, and New Communities are all ways the city can help bridge that gulfthey just need to truly be championed in order to work. It will take serious sustained effort from all the city's leadership to accomplish these goals.

Cross-posted at The District Curmudgeon.

Jaime Fearer worked in the book industry for over 10 years before deciding to formalize her passion for community building and planning by pursuing a Master of Community Planning at UMD. She lived in the Northeast DC neighborhood of Woodridge for 3 years, where she ran the blog stop, blog and roll. Jaime now lives in the Trinidad neighborhood of DC and is a community planner in Greenbelt. 
Geoff Hatchard is a geographer working for the U.S. Census Bureau. He lives in DC's Trinidad neighborhood. The opinions and views expressed in Geoff's writing on this blog are his, and do not necessarily represent the views of his employer. 

Comments

Add a comment »

Rent control in DC is a joke. Throw up a dividing wall or navigate some other loophole and it's no longer applicable to you. Very telling that he's so wedded to something that's going the way of retirement pensions.

by monkeyrotica on Jul 7, 2010 2:09 pm • linkreport

Rent control is a mess in DC. It warps incentives for renters and owners plus it encourages all kinds of abuse. This coming from a proud lefty.

by mike on Jul 7, 2010 2:28 pm • linkreport

How will he "aggressively implement" IZ?

It's pretty limited to certain large-scale developments, which DC doesn't have very much of these days due to that whole economy being underwater and all.

Is he saying it hasn't been implemented? Or is he just tossing out platitudes on issues he thinks the audience wants to hear?

by Fritz on Jul 7, 2010 3:13 pm • linkreport

Couple of things: the idea of IZ set-asides makes sense. set-asides for folks who are actually middle-income earners (household income of, say, $45k-$80k) actually strengthens the community. That's what "affordable housing" is supposed to mean--not a euphemism for warehousing the poorest of the unemployable poor in shantytowns.

Similarly the "New Communtities" initiative seems to be smart public policy. The idea of converting massed, concentrated poverty into mixed-income / mixed-use developments makes sense.

But as far as the permanent rent controls, one-to-one set-asides for fully subsidized public housing, and the rest, it's counter-productive. The only way that DC is going to continue to pick itself up out of a half-century of deep dysfunction is by returning to a healthy mix of poor-, middle-, and upper-class residents. The long-standing policy of artificially propping up the already ridiculously high number of DC residents at the bottommost rung of the economic ladder is bad policy. It destroys the services provided to both the poor and the middle-class, whether it's DCPS, DCFS, DCHA, or DHS. And it's a massive subsidy from District residents to our suburban neighbors, and cripples the District.

Fortunately, as the demographic mix continues to normalize, politicians will chase the vote elsewhere, and it's going to be more and more difficult to continue these politically expedient, well-intentioned, but counter-productive practices going forward.

by oboe on Jul 7, 2010 3:50 pm • linkreport

Fritz: There weren't a lot of details trotted out regarding IZ implementation. I believe it applies to buildings larger than 10 units (someone correct me if that's wrong), so it's not simply large-scale development where it could happen, but it certainly doesn't apply to rowhouse-level work.

by IMGoph on Jul 7, 2010 4:16 pm • linkreport

@IMGoph: You're right; I thought it applied to much larger projects - http://www.dhcd.dc.gov/dhcd/cwp/view,a,1243,q,647475.asp

So I guess the question back to Gray is whether he thinks the city and developers are somehow cheating by not complying with the IZ requirements.

by Fritz on Jul 7, 2010 5:39 pm • linkreport

There's no better way to make housing unaffordable for the average person than to implement rent control. (The experience of cities that implemented it shows it leads to massive disinvestments resulting in slumlord buildings and housing shortages.) It took a while, but NYC learned that hard lesson and acted on it. Can Gray really not know this? Or is just saying what he thinks his electorate wants to hear? Maybe we're better off with a mayor who doesn't answer questions 'period'.

by Lance on Jul 8, 2010 1:24 am • linkreport

Re: rent control - I believe it was on the City Paper blog that mentioned Gray specifically said at the TENAC forum that he didn't support a permanent rent control law at the time. Fast forward a short while, and he's co-introducing a bill to make rent control permanent. Apparently he stuck his finger in the wind, saw which way it was blowing, and decided to shift positions. Sorta like his whole "I was for streetcars before I voted against it, but I'm really for it, and it's all just a simple misunderstanding" shtick.

by Fritz on Jul 8, 2010 7:29 am • linkreport

Has Gray never heard about the disater that NYC rent controls have perpetuated?

by ThomasH on Jul 8, 2010 7:42 pm • linkreport

I'm no expert, but I've benefited from below-market "stabilized rent" in both NYC and DC, for which I'm eternally grateful. Is that different from "rent-control"?

by Matthias on Jul 9, 2010 12:50 pm • linkreport

Well, in any case, I'm sure we'll soon be hearing from Gray that he was misunderstood on the issue of "rent control", never supported making it permanent, and was just concerned about implementation.

Depending on whichever way the political winds blow...

by oboe on Jul 9, 2010 1:06 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or