Greater Greater Washington

Zoning


Montgomery zoning solutions, part 2: Mixed-use zones

Yesterday, I discussed the potential zone restructuring in the Montgomery County zoning rewrite. The series continues today with an overview of our thoughts on the mixed-use and commercial areas of the county.


Photo by thecourtyard on Flickr.

These areas are an important part of the county. They are where residents shop and work. But in many cases their design reflects outmoded, unsustainable thinking, with strip shopping centers and office parks surrounded by acres of parking.

This model won't continue to work for Montgomery County as our population grows, demographics shift, and we run out of developable land. The county must find ways to leverage the infrastructure of these areas.

One approach to solving this problem is with the Commercial-Residential (CR) Zones. The CR Zones are a family of mixed-use zones comprising a variety of densities, heights, and mix of uses.

Each CR Zone is defined by 4 factors indicated in the zone name: CR, C, R, and H. These symbols correspond to overall allowed density (CR), maximum non-residential density (C), maximum residential density (R), and maximum height (H).

Density is measured using Floor Area Ratio (FAR), which is essentially a measure of bulk. For example, a building that is 1-story tall and takes up its entire lot has an FAR of 1. If the same building were 2-stories tall but took up only half of its lot, it would still have an FAR of 1. You can read more about FAR here.

The graphic below explains the range of CR Zones in density and height:

Now, it's important to note that the above graphic does not represent what is possible on the same lot. Each of these examples represents what development could look like in different zones based on the CR designation. The CR-6.0 building at bottom right could not be built in the CR-0.5 zone at top right. But the CR-0.5 building at top right, a standard method of development, could be built in any of the denser zones.

Let's consider another example. What could we build if a parcel was zoned CR-4.0 | C-3.0 | R-3.5 | H-50?

Because developers can only achieve the maximum density by mixing uses, they have an incentive to do so. This will improve the mix of uses in our activity centers. Other regulatory elements will ensure better urban design by putting parking behind structures and encouraging the inclusion of public amenities.

Implementing of the CR zones during rewrite project will not increase densities or heights beyond what exists now without comprehensive review and public input, as required by law. Increasing the density of a parcel is something that belongs in the planning process, not the coding process.

Currently, the highest density allowed in the county is 8.0 FAR, which is only allowed in the CBD-3 zone. Those zones are adjacent to the Metro stations at Bethesda, Silver Spring, and Wheaton.

The map below shows existing (and draft conversion) densities for the CR Zones throughout the county. Note the range of colors. The CR Zones are not uniformly dense and do not necessarily represent an "up-zoning."

Matt Johnson works for the Montgomery County Planning Department.

Matt Johnson has lived in the Washington region since mid-2007. He has a Master's degree in Community Planning from the University of Maryland and a BS in Public Policy from Georgia Tech. He has worked in the planning field since 2006 and lives in Greenbelt, where he serves on the city's Advisory Planning Board. 

Comments

Add a comment »

I'd really like Silver Spring to incorporate and get out from under MoCo. There are 7 hair cutting in places in 1 square block of Silver Spring.

by Redline SOS on Jul 14, 2010 4:06 pm • linkreport

Off-topic question: Anyone know what software the 3D models in the first two images were done with?
It looks like its just a little bit cleaner than what you'd get from Sketchup. Illustrator, perhaps?

by Bilsko on Jul 14, 2010 4:26 pm • linkreport

@Bilsko
One of our interns made the buildings using Sketchup.

by Matt Johnson on Jul 14, 2010 4:28 pm • linkreport

@Matt
Wow - Kudos to you guys for getting a good intern. I've done some Sketchup models for my company's projects (distributed energy microgrids, like this one we're working on here in the Distric: http://goo.gl/47rA ) and haven't been able to get anything to look quite that clean.

Then again, I'm more of an energy quant-head so the design aesthetic doesn't come quite as naturally to me - I'll definitely be looking to those images for inspiration in the future.

by Bilsko on Jul 14, 2010 5:11 pm • linkreport

All of this BS talk of promoting so-called mix use is part of the cause of why there are not many Major HQ's Businesses relocating to Montgomery County then the other issue is the Extremely High proprty Taxes in Montgomery County....

I think its time for Montgomery County to stop being so Damn Anti-Growth and allow the County to grow at the Same Rate as Fairfax County, Loudon County, and Prince William County........

by tim on Jul 15, 2010 1:51 am • linkreport

Now I've got dust off my calculus books to understand the FAR. It would be nice to see some thoughts on removing of large thoroughfares into people friendly locales. Such as noted in these stories:

Highway removal in Oklahoma City:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-05-14-highways_N.htm

Highway removal and the new urbanism:
http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/07/06/huh-4-cases-of-how-tearing-down-a-highway-can-relieve-traffic-jams-and-help-save-a-city/

General discussion on city revitalization thorugh highway removal:
http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/23/destroying-highways-to-rebuild-cities/

America's top 10 least wanted highways:
http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/09/22/americas-least-wanted-highways/

Not that related but close to home:
http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post.cgi?id=2505

by derikp on Jul 15, 2010 9:04 am • linkreport

Matt, you have a wonderful unemotional factual writing style. this blog could use more of that.

by Jasper on Jul 15, 2010 9:41 am • linkreport

Thank you Tim too bad moco leaders and planners aren't listening

by Mike on Jul 15, 2010 9:53 am • linkreport

derikp said...

Now I've got dust off my calculus books to understand the FAR. It would be nice to see some thoughts on removing of large thoroughfares into people friendly locales. Such as noted in these stories:

Highway removal in Oklahoma City:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-05-14-highways_N.htm

Highway removal and the new urbanism:
http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/07/06/huh-4-cases-of-how-tearing-down-a-highway-can-relieve-traffic-jams-and-help-save-a-city/

General discussion on city revitalization thorugh highway removal:
http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/06/23/destroying-highways-to-rebuild-cities/

America's top 10 least wanted highways:
http://www.streetsblog.org/2008/09/22/americas-least-wanted-highways/

Not that related but close to home:
http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post.cgi?id=2505

re-

Whats is very disturbing is that there isn't enough Psychiatric Institutions to house those Maryland Hating anti-Highway Extremists...

It is a sign of mental illness to waste time hating on certain cities or states to the point of hating Highway Building and Widening.....

What I find very strange is that the people that hate highway buildng are always taking about tearing down highways or preventing highway building in the Northeast, Mid-West, and West Coast but NEVER the Southern States which are building and widening more Highways than any other Region in the US.....

It makes one to believe that the Highway Haters are from the South.....

by tim on Jul 15, 2010 10:30 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or