Greater Greater Washington

Pedestrians


Pedestrian safety should be paramount at construction sites

While an enclosed walkway on Marinelli Road between the White Flint Metro and its parking garage was meant to shield pedestrians from an adjacent construction site, it has actually made conditions less safe.


Photo by the author.

The walkway does its job during rush hour, but it creates an unneeded dark alley for people coming home after dinner.

Last weekend, I had dinner with a friend of mine who lives in one of the apartment buildings adjacent to the White Flint Metro. She asked me, "What's up with that creepy walkway by my apartment?"

One of the main reasons she moved from Columbia to White Flint was for the proximity to the Metro. After a night out at dinner, she got off the Metro to walk home. But she walked in the street rather than using the walkway. "I'm not going in that thing after dark because I can't see around the corner. Even worse, it's fenced in so I'd be trapped if something bad were to happen," she continued.


Photo by author.

It is clear that the enclosed walkway was erected with the rush hour commuter in mind. The walkway makes perfect sense for commuters walking from the parking garage to the Metro. It's light out and there are plenty of people around. My friend noted that at night she couldn't much see around the curve in the sidewalk. It was completely impossible to see around the corner into the parking garage.

It is disappointing that the walkway couldn't have been designed with safety and comfort in mind. I don't think that the enclosed walkway was built to feel unsafe at night on purpose. I think that the concept that a young woman would walk there after dark was just never taken into consideration.

Lighting, mirrors, and perhaps periodic openings for egress are all necessary attributes for a workable temporary walkway. These considerations will be even more important if this walkway is still there in the late fall, when the sun sets before the commute has ended.

Montgomery County can do better than this. The county should plan for pedestrian safety after residents leave those destinations and walk home from the Metro. They should require that if a sidewalk is obstructed due to construction, that a safe alternate route be provided. And that detour should include lighting and other safety features if necessary.

Cavan Wilk became interested in the physical layout and economic systems of modern human settlements while working on his Master's in Financial Economics. His writing often focuses on the interactions between a place's form, its economic systems, and the experiences of those who live in them. He lives in downtown Silver Spring. 

Comments

Add a comment »

There's one of these in Ballston, close to where I work. It actually has big canvas signs completely covering the side where light is supposed to get in. My main problem with it is that there's a tiny gap where you're supposed to enter and exit to a crosswalk. But it's a slip lane, so cars are going really fast and not looking for pedestrians. And they can't see you before you walk out of the covered walkway. So it's very dangerous.

by Tim on Aug 20, 2010 10:39 am • linkreport

No matter what some people will not feel safe walking in this walkway. There is a sidewalk on the other side that is wide and open. Probably the only reason why the walkway was built was the Metro garage. Interestingly this exaccerbates the problem with the protective median wall on Marinelli. Maybe the county will take a second look to create a pedestrian opening and modifying the wall near the Pike intersection.

by Cyrus on Aug 20, 2010 10:52 am • linkreport

I'm a young black male, and I don't walk through these things at night either. Anyone who knows about crime prevention through environmental design wouldn't build something like this anyways. At least if they use chicken wire to block jaywalking instead of the wood it would at least expose this thing to the passing street.

by Joshua D. on Aug 20, 2010 11:06 am • linkreport

Contractors build these things to local regulations. Last time I was in NYC I walked through one that was lit and open to the street. But that was your average city street where cars and pedestrians interact all the time and cars are going much slower. In this case it looks like they we required to place jersey barriers to protect people from potential auto harm which makes intermittent egress points impossible. Some lighting and a few lexan windows facing the work site would make it much more welcoming without much additional cost. Regulations on these structures need to be updated to reflect that.

by dano on Aug 20, 2010 11:47 am • linkreport

There are a few small windows facing the site but that isn't enough. Some more windows and lights on the site side would have done wonders.

by Jason on Aug 20, 2010 12:06 pm • linkreport

These things are really common in the city, but they are typically straight so you can see all the way to the end. Suburban ones probably tend to be longer and less straight. Good lighting is key, as is making them wide enough that pedestrians don't feel like cattle. It makes sense that places that are less pedestrian-friendly to begin with would have these sorts of problems.

by Matthias on Aug 21, 2010 4:04 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or