History
The non-circles of Washington: Part 2
Yesterday, I discussed the former circles of Washington. Today, let's take a look at the circles that never were.
There have been many proposals, some more serious than others, for unbuilt circles in DC. As the District changed from open countryside to city, plans were made to add circles in a variety of locations. Let's take a look at a few of these almost-circles.
Hamilton Circle, seen below in the 1921 edition of the Baist's real estate atlas of surveys of Washington, District of Columbia, was proposed at the corner of Massachusetts Avenue and Idaho Avenue NW. Though it was never built, it can still be seen in the property lines at this intersection.
Idaho Avenue was to continue to where Tilden Street and Reno Road NW meet today near the University of the District of Columbia, and there was a circle planned for the intersection. While this circle never came to pass, I'm labeling it Idaho Circle for the purposes of this discussion.
Near American University, Massachusetts Avenue passes through Wesley Circle, which was never fully built out and looks more like a collection of slip lanes than it does a circle. One interesting feature is the drive-through mailbox on the south side of the "circle". If you click here, you can still see the circle represented in some of the existing property lines.
McKinley Circle was part of a proposed development in what is now the Woodridge neighborhood. Today, it's the location of Barnard Hill Park.
Dahlgren Circle would have been located at the corner of Rhode Island Avenue and 12th Street NE. If you look here, you can still see it represented by the property lines on the eastern side of the intersection.
While it wasn't planned as a true circle, the combination of Adams, 30th, and W Streets NE would have created a near-perfect circle. I'm calling this one Adams Circle. Looking here, you can see that the yellow area on the map above was the only residential area around the circle to actually be constructed, while the rest ultimately became industrial land. In the end, the extreme topography here (the residential land is at a much higher elevation than the industrial land) precluded the circle ever truly being built.
Let's wrap up the proposed circles with some that were never built in areas just north of old Boundary Street.
Open up the map on the right, and you'll see it shows a proposed street grid that was not fully implemented in the area just north of the L'Enfant city. Note that today's Logan Circle was still known as Iowa Circle. What is now Sheridan Circle was labeled Logan Circle.There was a Meade Circle proposed at what is now the intersection of 16th Street, Columbia Road, and Mt. Pleasant Street. Grant Circle (which is now in Petworth) is shown where 12th Street, Columbia Road, and New Jersey and California Avenues all cross. Speaking of New Jersey Avenue, where it crosses an extended Vermont Avenue, there is a McClellan Circle. Finally, where U Street, North Capitol Street, and Rhode Island Avenue cross there is a Sedgwick Circle. All of these circles would have been named after Civil War Generals. I've linked to information about each of them.
Also worth noting are a few circles and partial-circles along the city's edge:
Wisconsin Circle is a quarter-circle at the intersection of Wisconsin Avenue and Western Avenue, just over the line in Maryland.
Pinehurst Circle is located in the Chevy Chase neighborhood of DC at the intersection of 33rd Street, Worthington Street, Utah Avenue, and Western Avenue. Recall that at the District's boundaries, Eastern, Western, and Southern Avenues and all of their sidewalks and curb cuts lie entirely within DC.The District side of Pinehurst Circle is a well-formed semi-circle with the roadway and curbs built to typical city standards. On the Maryland side, the property lines of the houses line up to form a circle, but the roadway was never built. They are accessible by a patchwork of driveways leading from Western Avenue and branching off to the different houses. The placement of one of DC's original 1792 boundary stones in the uncompleted section adds to the geometric intrigue of this half-formed circle.
Portal Circle? Blair Circle? The circle on Eastern Avenue where it meets North Portal Drive, 16th Street, and Colesville Road doesn't appear to have a name, but it's passed through by thousands each and every day entering and leaving DC.
Last, but certainly not least, my favorite partial circle, Carson Circle. This one-third of a circle is located where Michigan Avenue turns into Queens Chapel Road at Eastern Avenue, and it even has a bank in the middle of it. A more proper shrine in today's United States than the statues of generals that grace so many other circles?
Do you know about another proposed circle? Share it with us in the comments.
Comments
- Successful speed cameras require fair speed limits
- Amid scandal, don't lose sight of Gray's policy achievements
- VDOT ignores own data, pushes widening I-66
- Montgomery plans 160-mile, "gold standard" BRT system
- DC's divide need not be black and white
- Preservationists ask to shrink 3rd Church replacement
- Planners are the new public health officials














by Mike on Aug 24, 2010 9:18 am
by Tim on Aug 24, 2010 9:31 am
by Dude7 on Aug 24, 2010 9:37 am
by tom veil on Aug 24, 2010 9:38 am
It is not appropriate nor is it good netiquette to post the exact same comment verbatim in more than one thread.
In the future, please do not do so.
by Matt Johnson on Aug 24, 2010 9:40 am
by Tim on Aug 24, 2010 9:42 am
No. There was no large open space where Delaware and Massachusetts Avenues intersected prior to the construction of Union Station. That's when Columbus Circle was created. It was never a full circle.
by Matt Johnson on Aug 24, 2010 9:48 am
by Reid on Aug 24, 2010 9:59 am
by NikolasM on Aug 24, 2010 10:02 am
Was Observatory Circle ever a "real" circle? There's roads along the property line that complete the circle and lead to Wisconsin Avenue. But was it ever open to the public?
by Fritz on Aug 24, 2010 10:27 am
http://www.flickr.com/photos/theskippinghippy/4923159323/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/theskippinghippy/4923159547/
by FSheehan on Aug 24, 2010 11:03 am
by Cyrus on Aug 24, 2010 11:04 am
by FSheehan on Aug 24, 2010 11:13 am
I don't understand why there was never a plan for a circle at the intersections of Rhode Island, New Jersey, 4th Street NW and Florida Avenues. (Seen easily on this map. http://www.flickr.com/photos/imgoph/4906232110/)
The Ledroit Park Post office would remain in the middle of the circle. I never had a name for it, but since they are so often named after Generals- perhaps it could be Schwartzkoff Circle?
by Tom A. on Aug 24, 2010 2:10 pm
It can be seen on this map: http://tiny.cc/hrpqh
by Robby on Aug 24, 2010 2:46 pm
DDOT recently proposed 2 circles/roundabouts to bookend Sherman Avenue NW. One would be built at Sherman and Florida, the other at Sherman and Park. You can see Sherman and Florida here:
http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post.cgi?id=1138
DDOT appears to have eliminated all public documents containing drawings of the Sherman and Park proposal.
There is a blog proposal for 15th and Florida mentioned here:
http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post.cgi?id=1140
by Betrokken Burger on Aug 25, 2010 11:10 am
http://capitolhilltownsquare.org/index.html
Two years ago, Tommy Wells introduced a group that wants to reroute Pennsylvania Avenue SE between 7th and 9th Street to put in a Town Square. Since then, this group of developers have held many community meetings, where the vast majority of residents have expressed in short, easy-to-understand words their ridicule for the idea. Who wants to take their toddlers to play in a park in the middle of Pennsylvania Avenue?
The so-called Town Square Task Force then published a report that ignores the hundreds of negative comments submitted by residents and pretends that everyone wants to reroute Pennsylvania Avenue SE around a square or circle. The truth is, darn close to no residents want this.
Now even CM Wells says he does not support plans like this that will make the neighborhood less pedestrian friendly.
by Trulee Pist on Aug 25, 2010 2:28 pm
Have you ever been to Dupont Circle ... or Lincoln Park. Having them in the 'middle' of heavily travelled avenues isn't a problem. Actually, it works best in the context of this city to put them precisely there. Having people crossing over to the 'park in the middle' causees traffic to slow to a level that is appropriate for a city (vs. a rural road or highway) ... and guess what, the circle or square gets used by people ... just as L'Enfant intended when he designed our many squares. (Yes, you heard me correctly ... his plans had squares in them ... which got built for the most part as circles! ... except for maybe Mt. Vernon Square.)
by Lance on Aug 26, 2010 8:56 am
I would love to have a contiguous park (think Stanton or Lincoln) in place of the lifeless fragments that presently lie there. Anything that turns Pennsylvania Avenue into less of a speedway and more of a neighborhood boulevard is fine by me. And Lance is correct--L'Enfant designed the squares to be used by people, and chopping them up with vehicular lanes doesn't make them welcoming to people.
by Matthias on Aug 31, 2010 4:06 pm
by NikolasM on Aug 31, 2010 4:25 pm
by Andrew on Sep 2, 2010 6:58 pm
by IMGoph on Sep 2, 2010 7:32 pm
http://www.flickr.com/photos/imgoph/4906232110/
by Blaine on Mar 30, 2011 7:47 pm
Add a Comment