Public Spaces
Shake Shack should consider a park location
Shake Shack recently made the news when they announced they'd be opening a location in Dupont Circle, at the corner of 18th Street and Jefferson Place, NW.
Shake Shack has received many accolades for its food. But what makes Shake Shack's original location in New York City so iconic is not its hamburgers and milk shakes, but its relationship with the park in which it's located.
Shake Shack opened in Madison Square Park in 2004, in a small structure surrounded by trees, with casual seating scattered outside. The park, located in the highly urban Flatiron District, is 6.2 acres in size What would it take to duplicate the success of a Shake Shack inside a park in DC? Where would a good location be?
There are a few existing refreshments kiosks on the Mall, roughly the same size as the original Shake Shack. None of them sell anything beyond heated-up burgers and hot dogs. The food is clearly designed for desperate tourists, and there is no reason for anyone to make a trip to the Mall for lunch or dinner with friends. (Nevertheless, the Mitsitam cafe in the National Museum of the American Indian has garnered good reviews, and the National Gallery of Art has a nice gelato bar in the concourse.)
Can you imagine if Shake Shack could replace one of the kiosks on the Mall? The one closest to the Castle would be my pick, and I can imagine customers going for a ride on the carousel before or after their meals. This location gets heavy tourist traffic, and I bet an exciting cafe would lure locals as well.
Off the Mall, the trio of K Street parks could also use a commercial boost. Farragut Square, McPherson Square, and Franklin Square are all underutilized, and would benefit from a small structure. Realistically, only Franklin park would be large enough to not be overwhelmed by something the size of Shake Shack.
This building was built in 1930 at a cost of $7,841. Originally referred to as a "lodge," it contained toilet facilities and accommodations for park police (then known as park watchmen), and was electrically lighted and heated.
In 1936, a memo within the Park Police complained that the comfort station "has become the favored nightly meeting place for all the homosexuals in the city. They are here in great numbers every night, filing in and out of the comfort station in a steady stream until it is closed at midnight." In 1950, the District Commissioners requested the Park Service to close the comfort station in the hope that it would "reduce sex perversion." By the late 80s, if not earlier, the building was abandoned and locked up.
In the east end of the triangular park is the primary entrance to the old underground trolley station. In 1995 this led to the doomed food court dubbed Dupont Down Under, and a metal structure was added to promote the entrance. The project failed within a year, and eventually the metal structure was torn down. The stairs now are covered up and inaccessible, awaiting new development in the underground space. Nowadays you might see people lining up to board a bus to New York on the Massachusetts Ave side. The DC2NY bus makes 2 to 8 pickups per day there.
The old lodge deserves a more public use, being in such a perfect location. I would consider this the best potential spot for DC's Shake Shack, or equivalent thereof. Could DCCA be reimbursed for their renovation efforts, and suitable spaces could be found for the hosted organizations? Could the small park be landscaped to provide outdoor tables? What would it take to make this happen?
We need to work harder to find the best uses for our public spaces. There should be some way to duplicate in D.C. the success that Shake Shack has had in Madison Square Park.
Reservation 59 and Dupont Circle
Comments
- Latest Metro map drafts add Anacostia parks and other tweaks
- Bikeshare is a gateway to private biking, not competition
- Short-term Washingtonians deserve a voice, too
- DC Council makes major policy changes overnight
- Public land deals have both benefits and pitfalls
- Parklets give every block a little park
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools








I had really hoped the African-American Museum would throw off the stuffyness of the other museums and have a rooftop restaurant that would stay open until the wee hours with live music (celebrating the many contributions to American music by black artists) and good food. Sadly, It doesn't seem that will happen.
by David C on Aug 23, 2010 3:30 pm • link • report
by Ron on Aug 23, 2010 4:13 pm • link • report
The National Mall? I don't really care what the tourists eat...
by Jason on Aug 23, 2010 4:47 pm • link • report
by Stanton Park on Aug 23, 2010 4:48 pm • link • report
by Anon on Aug 23, 2010 5:01 pm • link • report
by Shipsa01 on Aug 23, 2010 5:08 pm • link • report
Let the people who service the homeless worry about that. That concern should not be something agents of economic development or parks and recreations have to restrain their plans because of...
by Jason on Aug 23, 2010 5:26 pm • link • report
he status quo at all cost means there is little hope for change.
by aaa on Aug 23, 2010 5:47 pm • link • report
Shake Shack could really invigorate the space, it's right on the border of the business district and the more touristy attractions, thus could serve both communities.
I wouldn't hold your breath, though, NPS doesn't know how to do good urban policy. They'd just as soon take the path of least resistance and do a huge contract with Aramark or Sodexho than take the time and energy to find smaller vendors who would actually benefit both the visitors and the parks with a unique presence and menu.
by wil on Aug 23, 2010 6:07 pm • link • report
And no mention of Michael's terrific idea of building kiosks over some of the steps down into the old trolley station tunnels?
by Rob Halligan on Aug 23, 2010 6:12 pm • link • report
However, I'd hesitate to frame this issue as a "How to locate Shake Shack within a park" issue, instead more of a general "How can we attract higher-quality vendors to our parks" issue.
Though to your credit, Mike- I think this article is tends to stay neutral in that sense, only using Shake Shack to highlight the issue rather than focus it; so my comment is really geared more toward others.
I'd certainly nominate those kiosks on the Mall as prime candidates for something -- anything -- better than the overpriced microwavable fare currently proferred.
While higher quality options could help to pull some more locals down to the Mall, it'd definitely take something *really* special to pull them down in great quantity; or at least something located nearer to the Metro stations than some of the kiosks.
I think many can agree that the Mall is nice to visit here and there, but for more regular visiting it's just too big to go from point A to point B in the timeframe that many would generally prefer when chasing down food options.
Also, a 5 minute walk on the Mall seems to feel longer than 5 minute walk anywhere else (to me at least), and I personally think that's a psychological effect from the scale of the Mall and perhaps also the crowds.
Now to turn this back to Shake Shack: I have to admit that if they were in a Mall kiosk- if I'm down there, I'd probably eat there; but I wouldn't make any more trips than I already do. They're not bad, but they're on the same level (in my opinion) as many of the options already in the Dupont/U St areas... so on an equal taste/cost level it'd be the ease of access to Dupont/U which win.
...Also, I cast my vote for Fojol in a kiosk.
by Bossi on Aug 23, 2010 6:35 pm • link • report
There are tons of people who would love to operate services like this in DC's parks. NPS contracting does not allow it.
by Ahem. on Aug 23, 2010 6:39 pm • link • report
by Neil Flanagan on Aug 23, 2010 9:02 pm • link • report
I know we're here to discuss issues, but lets make sure we channel our energy in the right direction and do something about it.
by The Internationalist on Aug 23, 2010 10:24 pm • link • report
No, Danny. No matter how much you like the ambiance of your store, your customers assuredly do not enjoy waiting in a huge line.
The guys at Taylor Gourmet make killer sandwiches with fresh ingredients at awe-inspiring speed. I've never felt "dehumanized" by the promptness of their service.
by andrew on Aug 24, 2010 12:47 am • link • report
by tom veil on Aug 24, 2010 11:38 am • link • report
The Downtown BID has tried to get NPS to take up a PPP approach for years, unsuccessfully. Cy Paumier, author of _Creating Vibrant City Centers_, worked with the BID on that effort.
Many activists, including people like myself and Michael Berman, have hammered at this point for years.
There needs to be a serious revision of how DC and the NPS interact, and sadly the Capital Space plan pretty much glossed over the fundamental issues about how to better activate NPS spaces and deal with the fundamental process, oversight, and regulatory requirements.
by Richard Layman on Aug 24, 2010 12:55 pm • link • report
by FSheehan on Aug 24, 2010 2:49 pm • link • report
by Gray on Aug 24, 2010 10:01 pm • link • report
One might consider looking at the properties owned by DC -- one of which is the Eastern Market Plaza.
On a side note, I think one way for the city to address issues at Franklin Square would be to encourage -- either through changes in regulation or just organization -- food trucks for the permiter of Franklin Park. Ironically, this seems to work pretty well for encouraging park use among the homeless popualtion, as they are often fed right out of trucks on the park. Put a couple of taco trucks on the park's perimeter, and work with NPS to at least provide seating within the park -- bistro tables and chairs -- and you might be able to activate this space even more.
The downside to this is that, unlike with the shake shack in madison square, the city or NPS would not be able to make as much money from the concessiion as if it were literally located within the park.
by norb on Aug 25, 2010 9:31 am • link • report
@Stanton Park: Yes, the food concession management is way too much like the Tourmobile contract - sadly. Designed for the favored vendor rather than guests. Ugh.
@Rob Halligan: Ah yes, http://flic.kr/mvjantzen/112667633/ ! I would love to see that happen.
And I should also point out there are smaller kiosks that could work in smaller parks. From NYC: http://flic.kr/mvjantzen/123565724/ and http://flic.kr/mvjantzen/123565725/
by M.V. Jantzen on Sep 7, 2010 9:39 pm • link • report
by Bossi on Sep 7, 2010 10:45 pm • link • report
Add a Comment