Will bike sharing get a boost from TIGER II?
When Capital Bikeshare launches later this year it will have about 1,100 bikes. That's going to be great, but how much better does a 3,600-bike system sound?
On Friday the Transportation Planning Board (TPB) submitted a grant request through the TIGER II program to dramatically expand Capital Bikeshare. In addition to the 1,000 bikes in DC and 100 in Arlington that will launch the system, TPB's proposal would add approximately:
- Another 1,000 new bikes to the District, for a total of 2,000
- 900 new bikes in Arlington, for a total of around 1,000
- 150 bikes in Alexandria
- 100 bikes in Reston
- 250 bikes in Montgomery County, in and around downtowns Bethesda, Silver Spring, and Rockville
- 50 bikes in College Park
- In addition to bikesharing, the proposal requests funds for new bike stations in Reston and Silver Spring
Bikesharing has the potential to revolutionize intra-urban travel. Cities that have rolled out large networks have seen dramatic increases in cycling as transportation. But the size of the system really matters. SmartBikeDC was clearly far too small, and while Capital Bikeshare's 1,100 bike system is a good start that will have dramatic effects in a few key neighborhoods, we're going to need a much larger system if we want to see Paris-like results. This TIGER grant, if we get it, would be a fantastic step towards that goal.
Last year the TPB submitted a much larger multi-modal TIGER request that included bikesharing, but was only awarded funds for bus improvements. This year's submission is focused completely on cycling.
Cross-posted at BeyondDC.
- An entrance at the Van Ness Metro station is about to close for three years
- With Metro, "on time" doesn't mean what you think it means
- Alexandria closes in on Potomac Yard Metro location
- See the beginnings of the Purple Line in Silver Spring
- There's history to behold on some of DC's manhole covers
- Alexandria has identified locations for its next 16 bikeshare stations
- Consumers say they like trains. Why don't economists care?