Greater Greater Washington

Pedestrians


14th Street plan brings innovation and a missed opportunity

The intersection of 14th and U, NW is a key retail and transportation hub in DC. A streetscape plan proposed for 14th Street will bring needed improvements to the corridor. But it also misses an important opportunity to create a civic space at this historic intersection.


An alternative for sidewalk design treatments at 14th and U.

Wednesday evening, DDOT and its consultant, Precision Systems, Inc., presented the latest preliminary design for the reconstruction of 14th Street NW between Thomas Circle and Florida Avenue.

The plan covers the entirety of the corridor, but focuses on the intersections of P Street, U Street and Florida Avenue with special sidewalk surface treatments.

While these sidewalk concepts grabbed headlines in next-day coverage from DCist and TBD On Foot, there are other important facets to the design, including some new-to-DC bike infrastructure that will introduce small improvements for cyclists.

However, the plan does not pay enough attention to the historic intersection of 14th and U. Project engineers seemed to view the large sidewalk in front of the Reeves Center as a liability instead of an opportunity for a true neighborhood civic space. However, project staff emphasized that they are open to making changes as the process moves forward.

In consultation with DDOT's bicycle program, project engineers included bike boxes at the intersections with U and P streets. However, instead of the non-colorized bike boxes recently installed at 16th and U or the green bike boxes common in other cities, the bike boxes on 14th will be marked with a stamped faux-brick pattern to improve visibility to drivers and traction for cyclists.


The design includes bus bulb-outs and moves bike lanes to the left of bus stops.
In addition, the corridor will receive bus bulb-outs, which are curb extensions at bus stops. These provide more space for bus shelters on the sidewalk, and eliminate the need for buses to pull in and out of traffic to reach a bus stop, which can reduce bus travel time.

In order to eliminate conflict with cyclists near the bus stops, the bike lanes switch to the left side of the bus stop. This practice can be used at bus stops and right-turn lanes. The intersection of Columbia Road and 18th Street NW is striped this way.

The design for shifting bike lanes on 14th Street could be problematic because the bike lane would shift to the left side of a general travel lane, instead of a right-turn only lane or bus-only lane. With heavy traffic, cyclists may find it difficult and dangerous to cross to and from the left-hand lane when instructed. This aspect of the plan may require more thought.

More importantly, the proposal as it stands is missing an uncommon opportunity to create a distinctive civic space at the historic intersection of 14th and U. Luckily, the design, which is at the 65 percent design stage, has not advanced too far to address this issue. As Precision Systems staffers said on Wednesday, "we still have opportunities to make changes...we are willing to entertain additional ideas."

The intersection of 14th & U has long stood firmly at the center of the U Street corridor's rich heritage. While the architecture of the Reeves Center does not live up to the importance of its location, the building does provide an oversized sidewalk on the northwest corner. Project engineers seemed blind to the potential of this space. Saying that this "area is too big," they explained on Wednesday that they were looking at sidewalk paving patterns that would "make the area look smaller."


The proposal would narrow lane widths and widen sidewalks. Image from DDOT.
The patterns presented for this intersection, as well as for P Street and Florida Avenue, received a lukewarm response.

While most meeting attendees seemed to like the idea of distinctive sidewalk treatments, many said that the designs needed more work. When one resident asked whether the project team had spoken with organizers of the 14th and U farmers market about their needs, or had considered furniture such as benches for the space, DDOT's Muhammed Khalid said they had not but would act on the suggestion.

The historical significance of this crossroads should compel a design that does more than make it feel smaller. The Columbia Heights civic plaza, located further north on 14th Street, could serve as an example of how a large sidewalk area and intersection can be transformed into a civic gathering space that brings a neighborhood together.

While amenities found in Columbia Heights like a fountain or grass terraces may not be appropriate for 14th and U, introducing seating areas and perhaps even extending the sidewalk design pattern into the roadway itself are a start.

Beyond design specifics, other questions remain for this proposal. The long-range streetcar plan includes tracks along 14th Street and no decision has been made on whether or how new tracks would be included in this project, as they were for the reconstruction of H Street NE.

In addition, the U Street reconstruction, scheduled for FY 2011, would have to be coordinated with this plan to minimize disruption. However, there is little likelihood of these projects beginning construction at the same time. DDOT has not yet identified federal dollars for the 14th Street plan, and this project will most likely begin in FY 2012 or later.

While it misses an important opportunity at 14th and U, this plan is an improvement for the corridor. Bus riders, pedestrians, and cyclists will benefit most. While midblock crossings of four traffic lanes will remain daunting, bus stop bulb-outs will make the street a better place to walk. As the design progresses to completion by the end of this year, it's important not to gloss over the design details and forget the importance of 14th and U.

Stephen Miller lived in the District from 2008 to 2011 and is now a student at Pratt Institute's city and regional planning masters program. 

Comments

Add a comment »

What a great idea for an Architectural design studio! The Reeves center fails miserably in missing the opportunity to give an urban space to that neighborhood what with the south and east facing orientation. I wonder if reworking (since deming is probably out of the question) the buildings facaes could be part of the equation. Ground floor retail, a nicely articulated facade (modernist or traditional;) would be a winner. I wonder what Michelangelo would do?

by Thayer-D on Oct 4, 2010 2:12 pm • linkreport

I don't think Columbia Heights is a good comparison to 14th and U - the problem with the Reeves Center corner is that they added a lot of space by widening the sidewalk, but that's it - that space is otherwise wasted. In Columbia Heights, the space actually forms a square, bounded by on all sides that creates a central focus. That would be very hard to do at 14th and U.

My preference in the long term would be to eventually tear down the Reeves Center and replace it with a structure that uses the historic lot lines and just good old regular-sized sidewalks.

by Alex B. on Oct 4, 2010 2:17 pm • linkreport

"unlike... green bike boxes common in other cities, the bike boxes on 14th will be marked with a stamped faux-brick pattern to improve visibility to drivers and traction for cyclists." Bike boxes are misinterpreted enough as is. Why introduce yet another treatment into the mix? The evolving standard is green, DDOT should pursue that unless they're ready to explain how this third option somehow improves compliance and use, and back it up with an experiment.

by darren on Oct 4, 2010 2:26 pm • linkreport

Tearing down the Reeves Center seems about the only way to get rid of that shoe repair place in the ground floor. What kind of sweetheart deal did they get to get and hold on to such prime real estate? I've never seen anyone in that place. Ever.

by monkeyrotica on Oct 4, 2010 2:32 pm • linkreport

DC should take a lesson from NYC which has made an art and science of carving communal spaces out of streets and sidewalks - which happens to be the only available public land they have left to redevelop. The new Broadway is a prime example. Fairfax Advocates for Better Bicycling posted an excellent video on the topic over the weekend. http://fabb-bikes.blogspot.com/

by J J Madden on Oct 4, 2010 3:52 pm • linkreport

Given that the Reeves Center area is pretty big, and that we have a bit of a hole in the budget, why not lease some of the space to a sidewalk café in the warmer months, or something to take up the space?

For now at least the Reeves Center still contributes lunch spenders to the local area and I'd like to see a study or two on any removal of the building on the effect of local businesses. An underground parking location would be nice to maintain, but I don't know how feasible that is.

by copperred on Oct 5, 2010 2:00 am • linkreport

I see two areas of improvement to the plan's ideas for the corridor.

1. Some of the brick patterns are interesting, but they just cold stop 50' from the intersection. That's boring. The designs could be better if the designers considered how the decorative brick began and ended, whether there were frames or a dissolution of the elements. I think that pedestrians would get a much better feeling of arrival at the corner if the design slowly woke them up to it.

2. None of these designs relates to the others. Why is that, if they're trying to enhance the unity of the corners? The designs would be better if they used a pattern or module in each design, either to form a distinct design at each corner, or as a foil for some other design element to react against.

by Neil Flanagan on Oct 5, 2010 6:37 am • linkreport

Actually, why not break into the z-direction with some elements. The module I mentioned in #2 there could be a sculptural style or object that gets manipulated for each point.

For example, Tom Otterness had an exhibit of his sculptures on Broadway 4-5 years ago. The cartoonish sculptures were linked together with satirical themes, and were generally just visible from at least one other work. People who caught sight of one of the sculptures were usually interested enough to go check some of the other ones out as they walked along the street.

I think it's a pretty great model of making the street feel continuous without total design.

by Neil Flanagan on Oct 5, 2010 6:45 am • linkreport

I could not agree more about the need to focus on the utility of the corner of 14th & U as a central meeting place for the community. When you combine the central area in front of the building and the wide sidewalks to the north and south, you have a relatively large area that can be activated, as proven by the 14th & U Farmers Market and other activities that have occurred there. The current landscaping and public space items are haphazardly located so as to create obstacles to work around and would need to be re-ordered to use the space more effectively. Particularly on the U Street side.

However, as I discussed with the streetscape designers a few months ago, until the city decides what the short term/long term fate of the Reeves Building is going to be, programming will be a temporary activation only. The employees and visitors are vital to the daytime economy as there is a lack of office presence in the area to support the commercial activity required to maintain a solid mix, so assuming the Reeves Building will be there for a few more years, attempts to activate the retail space need to be done strategically so as to complement and enhance the existing retail in the area,

However providing security for the building has overridden the need to utilize the potential of the retail spaces as connections to the streetscape. So what could be a great two floors of retail, within the atrium space, that serves as an anchor for the area, is instead a relatively dead space with retail that does not work. A bank, convenience store, gallery, shoe repair store, and hair salon (hidden inside), along with the credit union and lottery claim center do not a destination make, nor do they have the ability to spill onto the sidewalk as a cafe presence.

So, barring the reprogramming of the retail space, which is complicated by the existing tenants, the best opportunity for activity is on the U Street side, which will become a better space when the old bikeshare kiosk is removed. However, that should be seen as a first step. The concrete landscaping and the air vents/ledges are horrible details at ground level, that lead straight into the driveway/loading dock space, and adjacent parking lot. This is the area that needs to be reconfigured for a better use that will draw people to the area in the daytime.

by Scott on Oct 5, 2010 7:28 am • linkreport

DDot's plans use a lot of paint to mark street crosswalks, but uses stones, etc., for sidewalks. I don't understand why they don't use different pavers for crosswalks. It has to be far cheaper over the life of the intersection to do it this way and to a better effect.

by Carl Bergman on Oct 5, 2010 12:49 pm • linkreport

You can make whatever "creative" pattern in the sidewalk you want at the Reeves Center--it's still a dead, generic place on what could and should be a great corner. Why is changing the paving material being presented as a "redesign of the streetscape." They didn't even TALK to the farmer's market folks? Anyone charged with designing this space should be willing to spend A LOT of time there to see how people use the space, and to imagine how they COULD.

by DCMarkito on Oct 5, 2010 7:00 pm • linkreport

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or