Greater Greater Washington

Development


Zoning Review discusses retail

Wednesday's Zoning Review meeting on Retail Strategy discussed the good and the bad of retail.

The previous meeting's notes included a line that the Cleveland Park overlay may not be serving the community well. This brought out several overlay defenders including George Idelson, president of the CP Citizens Association, who argued that the overlay works very well. "Thanks to the overlay, we are not a restaurant row," he said. The overlay may have had some problems, like being hard to change or update, and DCRA hasn't always enforced it effectively.

The group didn't spend much time of this topic, but a few people defended the overlay while a few others criticized it for "retarding vibrancy" and being "too formulaic." I don't know all the history of this issue (please fill me in!) I did find this summary of the conflict over a Cosi last year.

Most of the workshop focused on a series of exercises where people answered certain questions. For example, "Retail and related uses should acommplish the following goals to help our city: they should..." Responses included:

  • foster interactivity on the streets
  • generate sales tax
  • meet residents' daily needs for goods and services
  • serve visitors and workers
  • help create a whole community
  • encourage pedestrian traffic and 'serendipitous' moments around the city
  • not negatively affect residential apartments
  • boost employment
  • encourage balance in the retail mix
  • exploit buildings in neighborhoods that were built for commercial purposes
  • remove the necessity of driving to accomplish everyday tasks
  • create entrepreneurship opportunities for existing neighborhood residents
  • retain existing residents
What's a bad use of ground floor retail space?
  • a dentist's office
  • a gas station
  • check cashing
  • offices
  • parking
  • blocked-up windows that don't let people see into the store
  • have retail off an atrium instead of facing the street
  • have too little pedestrian access to retail frontage
  • don't maintain a fair proportion of green space
Speaking of blocked-up windows, the rules for development in Reservation 13, near the old stadium, where all stores will have to keep their interiors visible to a depth of at least 20 feet from all windows.

Finally, the group briefly discussed ceiling heights. National retailers now want 14 foot ceilings in their spaces, but few existing DC buildings don't have that height. In new developments, with the height limits, if a developer builds a 14 foot first story, then they have to sacrifice a story higher up in the building to stay under the limit. Business groups have proposed allowing a few extra feet of height on buildings in retail corridors that put in 14 foot ground floors.

David Alpert is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Greater Greater Washington and Greater Greater Education. He worked as a Product Manager for Google for six years and has lived in the Boston, San Francisco, and New York metro areas in addition to Washington, DC. He loves the area which is, in many ways, greater than those others, and wants to see it become even greater. 

Comments

Add a Comment

Name: (will be displayed on the comments page)

Email: (must be your real address, but will be kept private)

URL: (optional, will be displayed)

Your comment:

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our comment policy.
Notify me of followup comments via email. (You can also subscribe without commenting.)
Save my name and email address on this computer so I don't have to enter it next time, and so I don't have to answer the anti-spam map challenge question in the future.

or