Public Spaces
Reforest underused Fort Circle fields to focus on active areas
The National Park Service owns 90% of the parkland in DC. The City Paper recently found this Google Maps mashup charting all the National Park Service properties in the District.
Everyone knows about Rock Creek Park, but residents often overlook the arc of parks that form the Fort Circle Parks.
The Fort Circle Parks are mostly grassy patches of land with few other amenities. Federal and District budgets are strained right now but per capita park spending in DC is the highest of any city in the country. NPS could enhance their appeal without significantly increasing their maintenance costs by focusing more limited resources on active recreation areas that benefit local neighborhoods instead of just maintaining empty lawns.
Outside of the original L'Enfant Plan, the federal government acquired parkland largely as a result of the 1902 McMillan Plan, a Senate report advocating a comprehensive park system for the District. One section of the plan proposed a "Fort Drive" to connect all the District's Civil War forts that previously dotted the high points of the city. This scenic roadway was to run along an uninterrupted crescent park corridor that the federal government would later assemble.
These parcels, scattered from Tenleytown to Fort Totten to Eastern Avenue to St. Elizabeths Hospital, form the Fort Circle Parks. These parcels still exist today and I have marked them, along with adjacent triangle parks, in red.

Though the Fort Circle Parks connect the Civil War forts, the McMillan Plan advocated their purchase to serve as local parks, too:
The views from these points are impressive in proportion to their commanding military positions, and they are well worth acquirement as future local parks, in addition to any claim their historic and military interest may afford.The roadway never came to fruition, but the arc of parkland still exists. Within this massive arc, one will find the occasional playground and the occasional picnic shelter, but too much of the land consists of unprogrammed lawns. These lawns don't serve neighbors as well as ballfields and playgrounds would, and they require regular mowing in the spring and summer.
Over the decades, the National Park Service and National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) have dreamt up plans to enhance the Fort Circle Parks, but nothing comprehensive has ever come to be.
NCPC now has a set of ideas for improving the Fort Circle Parks. They propose interpretive signs, a signed Greenway route, improved recreational facilities, and protection of the park's natural features.
Though it is good that NCPC has put forth an effort to get the ball rolling, it does not have any budgetary or management authority over the National Park Service, an agency that struggles to keep the National Mall in working order.
Within its current budget, the Park Service should consider reconfiguring some of the Fort Circle Parks to prioritize key recreational nodes while returning much of the lawns to low-maintenance forests. Removing the need to regularly mow unused laws will allow the Park Service to focus its efforts on playgrounds, ball fields, and other amenities neighborhoods desire.
Furthermore, restoring these lawns to forests will help the city achieve its goal of increasing the tree canopy to cover 40% of the city. Trees clean the air, prevent erosion, soak up rainwater, block noise, and enhance a neighborhood's beauty.
The NCPC plan doesn't propose what should go where, but each neighborhood should get a say in how its respective section of Fort Circle Parks should be used. For instance, if residents in one neighborhood already enjoy a playground and tennis courts, they might want a basketball court or a community garden on some of the underused land. The rest of the lawns, if rarely used, should then return to forest.
Here are a few pieces of the Fort Circle Parks that sit as unprogrammed lawns:
- Triangles at Nebraska Avenue and Van Ness Street in Tenleytown.
- Lots and blocks north of Tenley Circle.
- Lawns beside Missouri Avenue
- Fields between Gallatin and Galloway Streets NE.
- Expansive medians along sections of Eastern Avenue
The Park Service and NCPC should push to make these parks more appropriate for their settings.
Comments
- Cyclists are special and do have their own rules
- M Street cycle track keeps improving, draws church anger
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools
- O'Malley announces first projects using new gas tax money
- ICC losing bus service in classic bait and switch
- Can Loudoun grow while protecting its rural areas?
- Silver Spring mall could get massive facelift, new name








It would benefit both the parks and the bike sharing system if we could get bike sharing racks installed in NPS parks.
by Ward 1 Guy on Oct 6, 2010 10:24 am • link • report
Given, however, how high DC park's spending is already, how much would it cost to bring all these little parcels into control?
I'm very glad to have NPS run the bigger ones.
by charlie on Oct 6, 2010 10:43 am • link • report
It's hard to imagine NPS selling any of its land in return for some design conditions and in return for use of proceeds for "amenitizing" the remaining assets they'd retain....NPS is institutionally pretty stodgy...but it could make for a much better park, a much better bike and ped trail system, and much better TOD.
by jnb on Oct 6, 2010 10:58 am • link • report
While you're proposal is interesting and theoretical plausible, it must be considered that is it in the best interest of the majority of the population or is it in the best interest of your specific goals and wants.
by SquirrelBoy on Oct 6, 2010 11:33 am • link • report
by renegade09 on Oct 6, 2010 11:48 am • link • report
Not that I wouldn't rather see forests and better use.
by Tina on Oct 6, 2010 11:59 am • link • report
@renegade09: so true. Yet another way our plantation suffers. We cannot appeal to our elected members of COngress, who oversee NPS.
@Squirrelboy: I wish there were more places to play pickup sports activities. RCP is mostly wooded and not good for this. Meridian Hill/Malcolm X actually *banned* team sports. The Mall, schools, Anacostia park, Potomac Park, and some rec centers are the only places where residents can get together and toss around a baseball, football, or frisbee or whatever in any kind of group fashion.
by Ward 1 Guy on Oct 6, 2010 12:10 pm • link • report
by Jason on Oct 6, 2010 12:19 pm • link • report
by Herschel on Oct 6, 2010 12:19 pm • link • report
My main motivation is actually not to promote tree cover, but to provide a financially feasible way to fulfill neighborhood wishes for these parks. Per capita park spending in DC is already high, the DC government can't afford more spending right now, and the NPS budget can barely sustain the Mall, Congress's front yard. Ideally, we might keep all the fields open and simply dot them with more playgrounds and other amenities, but current budget constraints preclude that.
You're right that large, unprogrammed spaces have value. In fact, I was happy to find a good field in northern Rock Creek Park for kite flying. We certainly don't have to plant trees on every field, but selective reforestation with neighborhood input is our best chance to improve these parks for residents considering current financial and political limitations.
by Eric Fidler on Oct 6, 2010 12:20 pm • link • report
by David C on Oct 6, 2010 12:25 pm • link • report
Who knew that historical preservation could mean preserving negative space like that
pretty sure that parking lot in CP on top of the metro is preserved this way too. Its not the stores that are considered historic since they've changed hands multiple times and have been renovated. Its the parking lot thats protected. but that's off topic.
by Tina on Oct 6, 2010 12:30 pm • link • report
by R. Myers on Oct 6, 2010 1:04 pm • link • report
by pagodat on Oct 6, 2010 1:54 pm • link • report
by Ward 1 Guy on Oct 6, 2010 3:06 pm • link • report
by Molly Wei on Oct 6, 2010 4:24 pm • link • report
by joe on Oct 7, 2010 5:58 am • link • report
BTW: Home rule anybody?
by Jasper on Oct 7, 2010 11:57 am • link • report
http://harringtontours.com/rivercircleforts.html
by Nathan Harrington on Nov 13, 2010 6:10 pm • link • report
Add a Comment