Transit
Who are "seniors"?
Boarding the train at Union Station, the Amtrak gatekeeper called for seniors to pre-board as is their usual policy. Approximately half the waiting crowd got on, mostly very able-bodied far-from-elderly people who looked to be in their mid-50s and early 60s. One very non-old woman even said to her companion, "I love being a senior!"
As baby boomers get older, more and more of the population is going to consist of "seniors" even though most of them won't be any less able than a 45-year-old. And on Amtrak at least, there's no check for who is a senior, nor even a sign or announcement about what age is eligible.
I'm all for having aging people of declining mobility pre-board, but do we really mean to give all the baby boomers preference over everyone else? What's the fair thing to do?
Comments
- Bikeshare is a gateway to private biking, not competition
- Judge denies injunction against closing schools
- Long-term closures: A solution to single-tracking?
- Metro policy for refunds after delays falls short, riders say
- M Street cycle track keeps improving, draws church anger
- O'Malley announces first projects using new gas tax money
- Cyclists are special and do have their own rules







That way if you're 50 years old and in a jogging suit, it'll look funny if all of a sudden you're of limited mobility.
I don't think we're going to get to the point where we're carding people for extra time to board.
by Michael Perkins on May 9, 2008 3:15 pm • link • report
The pre-boarding preference should be given to the disabled only. That seems to be the fair thing to do.
As train travel gets more popular, the operators may need to switch to assigned seating (already common on many European and Asian routes).
by Laurence Aurbach on May 10, 2008 9:21 am • link • report
by jim on May 11, 2008 1:16 pm • link • report
Add a Comment